Skip to main content
Log in

Construct validity of cognitive-behavioral treatments for intimate and social loneliness

  • Articles
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two cognitive-behavioral interventions whose contents were matched to distinct types of loneliness (intimate and social) derived from empirical and theoretical literature and from a factor analysis of theRevised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Screened participants were assessed on measures varying in theoretical relevance to the treatment conditions. The hypotheses were that each treatment would favorably influence measures of high theoretical relevance (e.g., the social loneliness treatment would reflect changes on measures of social loneliness) and would have comparatively lesser effects on measures of lower theoretical relevance. Analysis of Covariance on pre-, post- and follow-up data indicated that the social loneliness treatment significantly decreased both intimate and social loneliness in the absence of differences on control variables. Issues relevant to the construct validity of the distinct treatments are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. A., & Arnoult, L. H. (1985). Attributional style and everyday problems in living: Depression, loneliness, and shyness.Social Cognition, 3(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, B. A. (1983). Factorial structure of the UCLA loneliness scale.Psychological Reports, 53, 883–889.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berzon, B., & Reisel, J. (1968).Encountertapes for Personal Growth Groups. Atlanta: Bell & Howell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analog therapy rationales.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2d. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. D., & Schmidt, L. D. (1983). Development and validation of revisions in the Counselor Rating Form.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong-Gierveld, J. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 119–128. AN: 74–34432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, M. S. (1983). A comparison of cognitive-behavioral and social skills approaches in the treatment of loneliness (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1983).Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1017B.

  • Hojat, H. (1982). Psychometric characteristics of the UCLA Loneliness Scale: A study with Iranian college students.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(3), 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., & Crandall, R. (Eds.). (1987). Loneliness: Theory, research, and applications.Special Issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. San Rafael, CA: Select Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.H., Hobbs, S.A., & Hockenbury, D. (1982). Loneliness and social skill deficits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 682–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, B. T. (1990a). Factor analysis of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale.Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 9(1), 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, B. T. (1990b). Loneliness: A review of current literature with implications for counseling and research.Journal of Counseling and Development, 68(4), 417–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L.A., Micheli, M., & Morasch, B. (1982). Loneliness and self-evaluation. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, (pp. 135–151). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D., & Peplau, L.A. (1982). Theoretical approaches to loneliness. In L.A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, (pp. 123–134). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orchard, J. M. (1986). The comparative effectiveness of social skill training and cognitive restructuring in the treatment of loneliness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, 1986).Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2178B.

  • Richmond, L. J., & Picken, E. D. (1986). A model for working with lonely clients: Sadler revisited. In S.M. Natale (Ed.),Psychotherapy and the Lonely Patient, (pp. 109–120). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, S. S. (1984). Research on social support, loneliness, and social isolation: Toward an integration.Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (1982). The measurement of loneliness. In L.A. Peplau and D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, (pp. 81–104). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J., & Yurko, K. (1984). Social and emotional loneliness: An examination of Weiss’s typology of loneliness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1313–1321. AN: 71-28730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness.Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N., & Sermat, V. (1983). Measuring loneliness in different relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1038–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, N.R., & Moore, D. (1986). The loneliness experience of college students: Sex differences.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, M.A. (1987). The relationship of differential loneliness, intimacy, and characterological attributional style to duration of loneliness.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (Ed.) (1973).Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1987). Reflections on the present state of loneliness research.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (1982). Loneliness, depression and cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In L.A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, (pp. 379–406). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakahi, W. R., & Duran, R. L. (1982). All the lonely people: The relationship among loneliness, communicative competence, and communication anxiety.Communication Quarterly, 30, 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was the recipient of the American College Personnel Association 1993–94 John Dallam Research Award. Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by an American Psychological Association Dissertation Research Award, by the Sally M. Berridge Foundation, and by Southwest Gas Corporation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McWhirter, B.T., Horan, J.J. Construct validity of cognitive-behavioral treatments for intimate and social loneliness. Current Psychology 15, 42–52 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686933

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686933

Keywords

Navigation