Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone mineral density and fracture in postmenopausal women

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This retrospective study examined bone mineral density (BMD) for discrimination of female patients with fractures. Bone densitometry was done in 146 patients over the age of 50 years at radius, lumbar spine, and proximal femur sites using single and dual photon absorptiometry. The patients were divided into three groups: (A) no osteoporotic fractures (n=92); (B) mild spine fractures with >15% compression (n=38); and (C) hip fractures (n=16). Groups B and C did not differ significantly from each other in BMD, but these groups differed significantly from group A for spine and femur BMD. No significant differences between groups were found for the radius. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the BMD of the proximal femur had the highest diagnostic sensitivity for both spine and femur fractures; the radius had the lowest overall sensitivity, and the spine was intermediate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health. Consensus Conference (1984) JAMA 252:799–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peck WA, Riggs BL, Bell NH, Wallace RB, Johnston CC, Gordon SL, Shulman LE (1988) Research directions in osteoporosis. Am J Med 84:275–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ III, Riggs BL (1983) Epidemiology of age-related fractures. In: Avioli LV (ed) The osteoporotoc syndrome: detection, prevention and treatment. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 45–72

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas TG, Steven RS (1974) Social effects of fractures of the neck of the femur. Br Med J 3:456–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ III (1982) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Invest 70:716–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grubb SA, Jacobson PC, Awbrey BJ, McCartney WH, Vincent LM, Talmage RV. (1984) Bone density in osteopenic women: a modified distal radius density measurement procedure to develop an “at risk” value for use in screening women. J Ortho Res 2:322–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M (1988) Radial and spinal bone mineral density in a patient population. Arthritis Rheum 31:891–897

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krolner B, Nielsen S Pors (1982) Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine in normal and osteoporotic women: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Clinical Science 62:329–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E (1988) Bone density of the radius spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Min Res 3:13–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Melton LJ, Wahner HW, Richelson LS, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1986) Osteoporosis and the risk of hip fracture. Am J Epidemiol 124:254–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seeman E, Wahner HW, Offord KP, Kumar R, Johnson WJ, Riggs BL (1982) Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton. J Clin Invest 69:1302–1309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lessig HJ, Meltzer MS, Siegel JA (1987) The symmetry of hip bone mineral density: a dual photon absorptiometry approach. J Clin Nucl Med 12:811–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Riggs BL, Seeman E, Hodgson SF, Taves DR, O'Fallon M (1982) Effect of the fluoride/calcium regimen on vertebral fracture occurrence in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 306:446–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchanan JR, Myers C, Greer RB, Lloyd T, Varano LA (1987) Assessment of the risk of vertebral fracture. J Bone Jt Surg 69A:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, Johnston C, Dawson-Hughes B, Baran D, Powell M, Notelovitz M (1987) Spine and femur density using dual-photon absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Min 2:211–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wasnich R, Ross PD, Heilbrun LK, Vogel J (1985) Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:745–751

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1988) Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1988) Discrimination of osteoporosis using single-photon (SPA) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) In: J Dequeker (ed) Proc 2nd Int Workshop on Noninvasive Bone Measurements. Leuvan Press, Leuvan, England

    Google Scholar 

  21. Firooznia H, Rafii M, Golimbu C, Schwartz MS, Ort P (1986) Trabecular mineral content of the spine in women with hip fracture: CT measurement. Radiology 159:737–740

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meltzer, M., Lessig, H.J. & Siegel, J.A. Bone mineral density and fracture in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 45, 142–145 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556056

Key words

Navigation