Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone radiogrametry: Caliper versus magnifying glass

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Radiogrametry was done on 100 hands by two observers using two methods: (1) caliper and (2) magnifying glass measurement. At the mid-point of the second metacarpal, the total width (D) and medullary width (d) were measured and cortical thickness (C) was calculated from the difference (D-d). Statistical analysis disclosed that the intra-observer CV is smaller for both observers using the magnifying glass than with the caliper (1.9 and 2.1% vs. 2.8 and 4.3%, respectively). The inter-observer CV is also less with the magnifying glass (4.2 and 5.7% vs. 6.2 and 6.9%, respectively). Although measurements made with each method correlate significantly, the values (mean ± SD) obtained in isolated measurements using each method differ significantly, with C for both observers, as well as the intra-observer coefficient of variation (CV), being smaller. These results, which demonstrated different bone mass values as quantitated using a caliper or magnifying glass, indicate the greater reliability and precision of the latter method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brincat M, Moniz CF, Kabalan S, Versi E, O'Dowd T, Magos AL, Montgomery J, Studd JWW (1987) Decline in skin collagen content and metacarpal index after the menopause and its prevention with sex hormone treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94: 126–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ettinger B, Genant MK, Cann ChE (1987) Postmenopausal bone loss is prevented by treatment with low-dosage estrogen with calcium. Ann Intern Med 106: 40–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steen-Hansen E, Hove B, Andresen J (1987) Bone mass in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Skeletal Radiol 16: 556–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett E, Nordin BEC (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis. Clin Radiol 11: 166–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Virtama P, Mahonen H (1960) Thickness of the cortical layer as an estimate of mineral content of human finger bones. Br J Radiol 33: 60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meema HE, Meema S (1987) Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 164: 405–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rico H, Vazquez A, Cabranes JA, Cantizano L, Hernandez ER, Krisnik I, Verela de Seijas E (1987) Long-term influence of Levo-Dopa on bone mass and growth hormone in postmenopausal women with Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 10: 87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rico H, DelRio A, Vila T, Patiño R, Carrera F, Espinos D (1979) The role of growth hormone in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med 139: 1263–1265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Compston JE, Vedi S, Stellon AJ (1986) Inter-observer and intra-observer variation in bone histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 36: 67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meema HE (1962) The occurrence of cortical bone atrophy in old age and osteoporosis. J Can Assoc Radiol 13: 27–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garn SM (1970) The early gain and the latter loss of cortical bone in nutritional perspecitive. Charles Thomas, Spring-field, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meema HE, Meema S (1987) Longitudinal microradioscopic comparisons on endosteal and justaendosteal bone loss in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and in those with end-stage renal disease, Bone 8: 343–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horsman A, Simpson B (1975) The measurement of sequential changes in cortical bone geometry. Br J Radiol 48: 471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rico H, DelRio A, Lozano C, Ciguenza R, Espinos D (1978) Parametros de masa osea en la poblacion normal española. Rev Clin Esp 148: 475–478

    Google Scholar 

  15. Orchard JW, Ewers SE, Haddad RG (1984) Identifying postmenopausal patients at risk of significant bone loss. Can Family Phys 30: 2503–2508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Avioli LV (1983) Osteoporosis. In: Peck WA (ed) Bone and mineral research. 1. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 280–318

    Google Scholar 

  17. Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis (1984) National Insitutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland JAMA 252:779–802

  18. Dequeker J (1975) Bone and aging. Ann Rheum Dis 34: 100–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duncan H (1976) Cortical porosis: a morphological evaluation. In: Jaworski ZFG (ed) Proc of the 1st Workshop on Bone Morphometry. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, pp 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jaworski ZFG (1983) Histomorphometric characteristics of metabolic bone disease. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 241–263

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aloia JF, Vaswani AN, Ellis KJ, Yuen K, Cohn SH (1986) Ageing and skeletal mass. Calcif Tissue Int (suppl) 39: 42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reid IR, King AR, Alexander CJ, Ibbertson HK (1988) Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (APD). Lancet 1: 143–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rico, H., Hernandez, E.R. Bone radiogrametry: Caliper versus magnifying glass. Calcif Tissue Int 45, 285–287 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556020

Key words

Navigation