Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer evaluation of an ecobehavioral program for families with children with developmental disabilities

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to conduct a consumer evaluation of Project Ecosystems, an inhome ecobehavioral program serving families with children with developmental disabilities. A consumer satisfaction questionnaire was designed and validated to examine process, programmatic outcome, and to assess perception of staff performance across consumer groups. The questionnaires were distributed to parents, careproviders, Regional Center workers who provided the referrals to Project Ecosystems, and other professionals who worked with Project Ecosystems' staff. The questions were divided into process, outcome, and staff performance so each element could be separated in the analysis. The data suggest considerable satisfaction from the consumers of Project Ecosystems' services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lutzker JR, Campbell RV, Newman M, et al.: Ecobehavioral interventions for abusive, neglectful, and high-risk families. In Singer GHS, Irvin LK (Eds.):Support for Caregiving Families: Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1989, pp. 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lutzker JR, Campbell RV, Harrold M: Project Ecosystems: an ecobehavioral approach to families with children with developmental disabilities.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities: 1992; 4:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lebow J: Pragmatic decisions in the evaluation of consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment.Evaluation and Program Planning 1982; 5:349–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz IS, Baer DM: Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991; 24:189–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazdin AE: Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1980; 13:259–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolf M: Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how behavior analysis is finding its heart.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1977: 11:203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawkins RP: Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991; 24:205–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winett RA, Moore JF, Anderson ES: Extending the concept of social validity: Behavior Analysis for disease prevention and health promotion.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2992; 24:215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coursey RD:Program Evaluation for Mental Health: Methods, Strategies, and Participants. N. Y.: Grune & Stratton, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christian WP.Effective Management in Human Services. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garfield SL: Some comments on consumer satisfaction in behavior therapy.Behavior Therapy 1983; 14:237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McClannahan LE: Krantz PJ: Evaluating accountability systems for protection of rights of autistic children and youth. In Hannah GT, Christian WP, Clark HB (Eds.):Preservation of Clients' Rights. New York: Free Press, 1981, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parloff MB: Who will be satisfield by “consumer satisfaction” evidence?Behavior Therapy 1983: 14:242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lebow J: Client satisfaction with mental health treatment: methodological considerations in assessment.Evaluation Review 1983; 7:729–752.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bornstein PH, Rychtarik RG. Consumer satisfaction in adult behavior therapy: Procedures, problems and future perspectives.Behavior Therapy 1983; 12:643–652.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fenske EC, Zalenski S., Krantz PJ, et al.: Princeton Child Development Institute Education Program, 1984–1985. Annual Report. Princeton, 1985.

  17. Lutzker JR, Wesch D, Rice JM: Project 12 Ways: Measuring outcome of a large in-home service treatment and prevention of child abuse and neglect.Child Abuse and Neglect 1984; 8:519–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutzker JR, Campbell RV, Newman MR, et al.: Ecobehavioral interventions for abusive neglectful, and high-risk families.Child Abuse and Neglect 1984; 519–524.

  19. Harrold M, Lutzker JR, Campbell RV, et al.: Improving parent-child interactions for families of children with developmental disabilities.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. In press.

  20. Kiesel KB, Lutzker JR, Campbell RV. Behavioral relaxation training to decrease hyperventilation and seizures in a profoundly retarded epileptic child.Journal of the Multihandicapped Person 1989; 2:179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McMahon RJ, Tiedmann GL, Forehand R, et al.: Parental satisfaction with parent training to modify child noncompliance.Behavior Therapy 1984; 15:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Brien, M.P., Lutzker, J.R. & Campbell, R.V. Consumer evaluation of an ecobehavioral program for families with children with developmental disabilities. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 20, 278–284 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518697

Keywords

Navigation