Skip to main content
Log in

Pneumoperitoneum following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Does the timing of panendoscopy matter?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has had a significant impact on enteral alimentation in patients unable to maintain adequate oral caloric intake. PEG avoids the morbidity and mortality associated with the traditional feeding gastrostomies placed by celiotomy. Several authors have documented benign, self-limiting pneumoperitoneum following PEG placement. No study has addressed whether the timing of panendoscopy in relation to gastric puncture has an effect on the incidence of post-PEG pneumoperitoneum. The authors prospectively studied 30 patients undergoing PEG. Panendoscopy was either performed before or after gastric puncture, and each patient then had abdominal radiographs to determine the presence of pneumoperitoneum. Four of 16 patients (25%) having panendoscopy prior to gastric puncture had radiographic evidence of pneumoperitoneum compared to three of 14 patients (23%) having panendoscopy following gastric puncture. The authors conclude that the timing of panendoscopy in relation to gastric puncture does not significantly effect the incidence of post-PEG pneumoperitoneum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bryant L, Wiot J, Kloecker R (1963) A study of the factors affecting the incidence and duration of postoperative pneumoperitoneum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117: 145–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauderer M, Ponsky J (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 15: 872–875

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gottfried E, Plumser A, Clair M (1986) Pneumoperitoneum following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 32: 397–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillman K (1982) Pneumoperitoneum—a review. Crit Care Med 10: 476–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madura M, Craig R, Shields T (1982) Unusual causes of spontaneous pneumoperitoneum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154: 417–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mellinger J, Schonholz S, Ponsky J (1990) Endoscopic techniques for enteral access and alimentation. Probl Gen Surg 7: 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plumser A, Gottfried E, Clair M (1984) Pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 79: 440–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ponsky J, Gauderer M (1981) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 27: 9–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnall H, Falkenstein D, Raicht R (1987) Persistent pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 33: 248–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stassen W, McCullough A, Marshall J, Eckhauser M (1984) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: another cause of “benign” pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc 30: 296–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strodell W, Lemmer J, Eckhauser F, Botham M, Dent T (1983) Early experience with endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy. Arch Surg 118: 449–453

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wills J, Oglesby J (1983) Percutaneous gastrostomy. Radiology 149: 449–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pidala, M.J., Slezak, F.A. & Porter, J.A. Pneumoperitoneum following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 6, 128–129 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02309084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02309084

Key words

Navigation