Skip to main content
Log in

An information system for head and neck tumors: Optimal use of abstracting and retrieval resources

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report describes a symbiotic interaction between a hospital tumor registry and the physicians in a medical school department of otolaryngology. The tumor registry is responsible for collecting central registry data, entering both central registry and department-specific data, performing routine data maintenance functions, and tracking the patients over time. The departmental physicians collect site-specific data and, after entry into a computer-based data base management system, can access the information without intermediaries and at their convenience. The result is a comprehensive information resource for head and neck cancer. The development of a medical subspeciality information system, as a satellite to the central registry mechanism, is noteworthy in its low cost, frequent physican use, better patient tracking, improved patient care, and increased clinical relevance of registry activites. A subtle but pervasive benefit is the increased sense of mission experienced by all concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hokanson, J. A., Costanzi, J. J., Smith, M. S., et al., Design considerations for a medical school hospital cancer patient data system.Cancer 51:1556–1561, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olson, K. B., and Wallingford, S. C., Why a tumor registry is important.Bull. Am. Coll. Surgeons 53(2)1–3, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cutler, S. J., Cancer registries: Opportunities and responsibilities.JNCI 57(4):741–742, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laszlo, J., Cox, E., and Angle, C., Special article on tumor registries: The hospital tumor registry present status and future prospects.Cancer 38:395–401, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heiberger, R. M., Miller, C. L., Feigl, P. et al., A novel method of assessing completeness of tumor registration.Cancer 51:2362–2366, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levinson, D., Information, computers and clinical practice.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 249:607–609, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, H., Data network security: Everyone's problem.Data Commun. 9:60–76, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., et al.,Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon, W. V.,Biomedical Computer Programs P-series User's Manual, University of California Press, Los Angeles, California, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan, T. A., Joiner, B. L., and Ryan, B. F.,Minitab Reference Manual, Statistics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DISSPLA User's Manual, Integrated Software Systems Corporation, 4185 Sorrento Valley Boulevard, San Diego.

  12. Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P., and Helwig, J. T.,A User's Guide to SAS, SAS Institute, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.

  13. Quinn, F. B., Hokanson, J. A., McCracken, M. M., and Stiernberg, C. M., Dissemination of computer skills among physicians: The infectious process model.J. Med. Syst., 8:307–317, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hokanson, J.A., Stiernberg, C., Quinn, F.B. et al. An information system for head and neck tumors: Optimal use of abstracting and retrieval resources. J Med Syst 8, 217–228 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222170

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222170

Keywords

Navigation