Skip to main content
Log in

The nutritional quality of drum-dried algae produced in open door mass culture

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

The yield of three large scale cultures ofScenedesmus acutus, Chlorella vulgaris, andCoelastrum proboscideum was drum dried. The amino acid composition of the three species proved to compare well with the FAO (11) amino acid pattern except for methionine and isoleucine. Bio-assay evaluation of the three algal proteins gave the following values: protein efficiency ratio, 1.9–2.1; net protein ratio, 2,4–2.8; biological value, 75–78; digestibility coefficient 88–89; and calculated net protein utilization 67–69. Total nucleic acid content was about 4%. Uric acid content in the plasma of rats fed Scenedesmus, Chlorella, and Coelastrum diets was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in plasma of rats fed on a casein diet.

Zusammenfassung

Proben von Massenkulturen der Algen Scenedesmus acutus, Chlorella vulgaris und Coelastrum proboscideum wurden getrocknet und untersucht. Die Aminosäurezusammensetzung der Proteine der drei Stämme war mit der von der FAO (11) empfohlenen vergleichbar außer für Methionin und Isoleucin. Die biologische Auswertung der drei Algenproteine ergab folgende Werte: Protein efficiency ratio 1,9–2,1; net protein ratio 2,4–2,8; biologischer Wert 75–78; digestibility coefficient 88–89; berechnete net protein utilization 67–69. Der Gesamt-Nucleinsäuregehalt betrug etwa 4%. Die Harnsäurekonzentration im Serum von mit Algen gefütterten Ratten war signifikant höher als bei Tieren mit einer Casein-Diät.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen ON (1953) In: Experiments in soil bacteriology. 1st Ed. Burgess Publ Co (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.O.A.C. (1965), Official Method of Analysis. 8th Ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashwell G (1957) Methods in Enzymology, Vol III:87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker HW, Venkataraman LV (1978) Algae for Feed and Food. (CFTRI), Mysore, 570013, India. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn, Limnol 11:79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brune H, Walz OP (1978) In: Soeder CJ, Binsack R (Eds) Microalgae for Food and Feed. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn, Limnol, 11:79

  6. Bender AE, Doell BH (1957) Brit J Nutrition 11:140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton K (1968) Methods in Enzymology, Vol 12, Part 3:163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chick HH, Hutchinson JCD, Jackson HH (1935) Biochem 3, (29), 1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Fouly MM, Abdalla FE, Saleh AM (1979), Al-Azhar Agric Res Bull No 22, Al-Azhar Univ Press, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  10. El-Fouly MM, Abdalla FE, Saleh AM, Shaheen AB ad El-Baz FK (1984) Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 67:4, (Algological Studies 37) 461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1973), Energy and Protein Requirements. FAO Nutrition Meeting Report Series No 52

  12. Gross R, Schoneberger H, Gross U, Lorenzen H (1982) Ber Deutsch Bot Gress Bd 95:323

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaleel SA, Soeder CJ (1973) Indian Food Packer, Vol XXVII (1):45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kofranyi E (1978) In: Soeder CI, Binsack R (Eds) Microalgae for Fpod and Feed. Ergebn Limnol 11:150

  15. Kraut H, Jekat P, Pabst W (1966) Nutr Deita 8:130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lubitz JA (1963) J Food Sci 28:229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Markaham R (1942) Biochemical J 36:79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meffert ME, Pabst W (1963) Nutr Diets 5:235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell HH (1924) J Biol Chem 163:599

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pabst W (1975) Wirtschaft 58,(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Senez J (1972) In: Gounelle de Pontane (Ed) Proteins from Hydrocarbons, P 8, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soeder CJ (1976) Naturwissenschaften 63:131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Soeder CJ, Pabst W (1970) Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 83 (11):607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Subbulakshmi G, Becker WH, Venkataraman LV (1976) Nutrition Reports International, Vol 14 (5):581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner KH, Siddiqi I (1973) Naturwissenschaften 60:109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wanka F (1962) Planta 58:594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The project was partially financed by the Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (BMFT) and the Egyptian Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saleh, A.M., Hussein, L.A., Abdalla, F.E. et al. The nutritional quality of drum-dried algae produced in open door mass culture. Z Ernährungswiss 24, 256–263 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02023671

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02023671

Key words

Navigation