Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic resistance ofEscherichia coli in fecal samples of healthy people in two different areas in an industrialized country

Antibiotikaresistenz von Escherichia coli in Stuhlproben gesunder Personen in zwei verschiedenen Regionen eines Industrielandes

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fecal samples of 310 healthy persons, from two populations from different areas in the Netherlands, were examined for the presence ofEscherichia coli resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin. High prevalences of resistance were found in both populations, ranging from 28% for trimethoprim to 89% for ampicillin. The percentages of the fecal samples with a dominantly resistantE. coli flora (> 50% resistance) were distinctly lower, ranging from 1% for nitrofurantoin to 21% for tetracycline. No significant differences in the level of resistance were observed between these two comparable populations in two different areas. The susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobial agents of 456 at random isolatedE. coli were determined. The percentages of resistance varied widely: from 80% for chloramphenicol to 9% for nitrofurantoin. Only 19% of the isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested and 14% were resistant to more than four of the agents tested. Great differences in resistance rates between the two populations examined were seen for chloramphenicol (80% to 41%) and trimethoprim (16% to 36%). The results of this study underscore the presence of a human reservoir of antibiotic resistant microorganisms.

Zusammenfassung

Escherichia coli-Resistenz gegen Ampicillin, Tetracyclin, Sulfamethoxazol, Trimethoprim und Nitrofurantoin wurde in Isolaten aus Stuhlproben von 310 gesunden Personen aus zwei Bevölkerungsgruppen verschiedener Regionen der Niederlande geprüft. In beiden Populationen fanden sich hohe Resistenzraten von 28% gegen Trimethoprim bis 89% gegen Ampicillin. Der Prozentsatz von Stuhlproben mit dominant resistenterE. coli-Flora (mehr als 50% resistente Stämme) war eindeutig geringer mit 1% für Nitrofurantoin und 21 für Tetracyclin. Der Grad der Resistenz war zwischen den vergleichbaren Populationen dieser zwei verschiedenen Regionen nicht signifikant verschieden. Die Empfindlichkeit der von 456 Personen isoliertenE. coli-Stämmen gegen 11 Antibiotika wurde untersucht. Die Resistenzraten zeigten erhebliche Unterschiede von 80% für Chloramphenicol bis 9% für Nitrofurantoin. Nur 19% der Isolate waren gegen alle Testantibiotika empfindlich, 14% waren gegen mehr als vier der Testsubstanzen resistent. Die beiden Populationen wiesen große Unterschiede in den Resistenzraten gegen Chloramphenicol (80% gegenüber 41%) und Trimethoprim (16% gegenüber 36%) auf. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie bestätigen das Vorliegen eines Reservoirs an resistenten Mikroorganismen beim Menschen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Brien, T. F. and theMembers of Task Force 2 Resistance of bacteria to antibacterial agents: report of Task Force 2. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9 (1987) (Suppl. 3) S244-S260.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, S. P., McMurray, L. M., Hooper, D. C., Wolfson, J. S., Levy, S. B. Cross-resistance to fluoroquinolones in multiple-antibiotic-resistant (Mar)Escherichia coli selected by tetracycline or chloramphenicol: decreased drug accumulation associated with membrane changes in addition to OmpF reduction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 1318–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, L. M., Lawrence, J. M., Josty, I. C., Hopewell, R., Margerrison, E. E. C., Cullen, M. E. Ciprofloxacin and the fluoroquinolones. New concepts on the mechanism of action and resistance. Am. J. Med. 87 (1989) (Suppl. 5A) 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parry, M. F., Panzer, K. B., Yukna, M. E. Quinolone resistance. Susceptibility data from a 300-bed community-hospital. Am. J. Med. 87 (1989) (Suppl. 5A) 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aoyama, H., Sato, K., Kato, T., Hirai, K., Mitsuhashi, S. Norfloxacin resistance in a clinical isolate ofEscherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 1640–1641.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kresken, M., Wiedemann, B. Development of resistance to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquinolones after the introduction of norfloxacin and ofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 1285–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwood, D. Antimicrobial chemotherapy, second edition. Oxford University Press, New York 1989, pp. 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kunin, C. M., Lipton, H. L., Tupasi, T., Saks, T., Scheckler, W., Jivani, A., Goic, A., Martin, R., Guerrant, R., Thamlikitkul, V. Social behavioral and practical factors affecting antibiotic use worldwide; report of Task Force 4. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9 (1987) (Suppl. 3) 270–285.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkey, P. M. Resistant bacteria in the normal human flora. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) (Suppl. C.) 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lester, S. C., del Pilar Pla, M., Wang, F., Perez Schael, I., Jiang, H., O'Brien, T. The carriage ofEscherichia coli resistant to antimicrobial agents by healthy children in Boston, in Caracas, Venezuela, and in Qin Pu, China. N. Engl. J. Med. 323 (1990) 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization, Scientific Working Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Control of antibiotic-resistant bacteria; memorandum based on report from WHO meeting. Bull. WHO 61 (1984) 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Degener, J. E., Smit, A., Michel, M., Valkenburg, H., Muller, L. Faecal carriage of aerobic gram-negative bacilli and drug resistance ofE. coli in different age-groups in Dutch urban communities. J. Med. Microb. 16 (1983) 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Degener, J. E., van Hooft, I., van Stiphout, W., Luchmun, R. Veranderende gevoeligheid vanEscherichia coli voor antibiotica in de bevolking. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 134 (1990) 2296–2299.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonten, M., Philips, J., Houben, T., Stobberingh, E. High prevalence of antibiotic resistantEscherichia coli in faecal samples of students in the south-east of the Netherlands. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26 (1990) 585–592.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levy, S. B., Marshall, B., Schluederberg, S., Rose, D., Davis, J. High frequency of antimicrobial resistance in human fecal flora. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 1801–1806.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, S. B. Starting life resistance-free. N. Engl. J. Med. 323 (1990) 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murray, B. E., Rensimer, E. R., DuPont, H. L. Emergence of high-level trimethoprim resistance in fecalEscherichia coli during oral administration of trimethoprim or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. N. Engl. J. Med. 306 (1982) 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Timmis, K. N., Gonzales-Carrero, M. I., Sekizaki, T., Rojo, F. Biological activities specified by antibiotic resistance plasmids. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) (Suppl. C) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linton, A. H. Flow of resistance genes in the environment and from animals to man. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) (Suppl. C) 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Corpet, D. E. Ecological factors influencing the transfer of plasmidsin vitro andin vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) (Suppl. C) 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiedemann, B., Knothe, H. Epidemiological investigations of R factor-bearing enterobacteria in man and animal in Germany. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 182 (1971) 380–382.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guinée, P. A. M. Bacterial drug resistance in animals. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 182 (1971) 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moorhouse, E. Prevalence of R+ bacteria in infants in Ireland. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 182 (1971) 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Levy, S. B., Fitzgerald, G. B., Macone, A. B. Changes in intestinal flora of farm personnel after introduction of a tetracycline-supplemented feed on a farm. N. Engl. J. Med. 295 (1976) 583–588.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Linton, A. H., Howe, K., Hartley, C. L., Clements, H. M., Richmond, M. H., Osborne, A. D. Antibiotic resistance amongEscherichia coli O- serotypes from the gut and carcasses of commercially slaughtered broiler chickens: a potential public health hazard. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 42 (1977) 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ozanne, G., Bédard, P., Ducic, S., Panisset, J. Antibiotic multiresistance among coliforms isolated from the gut of swine and abattoir workers: evidence of transfer from animal to man. Can. J. Public Health 78 (1987) 340–344.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Philips, I., King, A., Gransden, W., Eykin, S. The antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from the blood of patients in St. Thomas' Hospital 1969–1988. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 25 (1990) (Suppl. C) 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Levy, S. B., Hedges, R. W., Sullivan, F., Medeiros, A. A., Sosroseputros, H. Multiple antibiotic resistance plasmids inEnterobacteriaceae isolated from diarrhoeal specimens of hospitalized children in Indonesia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16 (1985) 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hachler, H., Cohen, S. P., Levy, S. B. MarA, a regulated locus which controls expression of chromosomal multiple antibiotic resistance inEscherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 173 (1991) 5532–5538.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Senerwa, D., Mutanda, L. N., Gathuma, J. M., Olsvik, O. Antimicrobial resistance of enteropathogenicEscherichia coli strains from a nosocomial outbreak in Kenya. APMIS 99 (1991) 728–734.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonten, M., Stobberingh, E., Philips, J. et al. Antibiotic resistance ofEscherichia coli in fecal samples of healthy people in two different areas in an industrialized country. Infection 20, 258–262 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01710790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01710790

Keywords

Navigation