Skip to main content
Log in

Is adjuvant treatment with vinblastine effective in reducing the occurrence of distant metastasis in limited squamous cell lung cancer? A randomized study

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the usefulness of treatment with vinblastine (VLB) in the prevention of cancer metastasis in squamous cell lung cancer, 50 patients with locoregional disease were randomized to receive either locoregional RT alone (group A) or a weekly intravenous bolus injection of VLB (6 mg/m2) concurrently with and after locoregional radiotherapy (RT) (55 Gy in 6 weeks) until the appearance of metastases (group B). Neither the incidence of death with metastases, metastasis-free survival (MFS) nor overall survival (S) were significantly affected by treatment with the drug. However, due to the limited number of patients in each group, the power of the statistical test was such to allow only the detection of differences in MFS and S to or more than 80 per cent at theP=0.05 level. Local tumor response was significantly superior in group B (P<0.05). Acute toxicity (dysphagia, myelosuppression) during RT was significantly worse in group B. During long-term therapy with VLB, mild polyneuropathy developed in the majority of patients in group B. Furthermore, seven patients discontinued treatment with VLB during maintenance due to compliance (4) and excessive neurotoxicity (3).

This treatment schedule with VLB is not recommended for patients with locoregional squamous cell lung cancer as significant toxicity is present during and after RT and significant increase in MFS and S is lacking. Because of an apparent increase in local response, the combination of VLB and RT merits further investigation in those tumors where local tumor control is crucial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atassi, G., Dumont, P., andVandendris, M., 1982, Investigation of thein vivo antiinvasive and anti-metastatic effect of desacetyl vinblastine amide sulphate or vindesine.Invasion and Metastasis,2, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coy, P., 1970, A randomized study of irradiation and vinblastine in lung cancer.Cancer,26, 803–807.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crosbie, W. A., Kamdar, H. H., andBelcher, J. R., 1966, A controlled trial of vinblastine sulphate in the treatment of cancer of the lung.British Journal of Diseases of the Chest,60, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson, G. A., 1983,Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education, International Student Edition (London: McGraw-Hill), pp. 371–397.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geuens, G., Nuydens, R., Willebrords, R., Vande Veire, R., Goosens, F., Dragonetti, C., Mareel, M., andDe Brabander, M., 1985, Effects of tubulozole on the microtubule system of cells in culture andin vivo.Cancer Research,45, 733–742.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hart, I. R., Raz, A., andFidler, I. J., 1980, Effect of cytoskeleton-disrupting agents on the metastatic behaviour of melanoma cells.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,64, 891–900.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kal, H. B., andBarendsen, G. W., 1980, Cell survival and growth delay in rat-R1 tumors after radiation and vinblastine treatment.British Journal of Cancer,43, Suppl. IV, 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mareel, M., andDe Brabander, M., 1978, Effect of microtubule inhibitors on malignant invasionin vitro.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,61, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mareel, M., Storme, G., De Bruyne, G., andVan Cauwenberghe, R., 1982, Vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine: anti-invasive effect of MO4-mouse fibrosarcoma cellsin vitro.European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology,18, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schallier, D., Storme, G., De Bruyne, G., andMareel, M., 1981, Anti-invasive effect of a microtubule inhibitor (Nocodazole) on malignant epithelial cellsin vitro.Tumor Markers and Progesssion, edited by M. R. Price, A. Jeney and K. Lapis (Amsterdam: Kugler), pp. 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selawry, O. S., 1973, Monochemotherapy of bronchogenic carcinoma with special reference to cell type.Cancer Chemotherapy Reports,4, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Storme, G. A., De Neve, W. J., De Bruyne, G. K., andMareel, M. M., 1985, Radiosensitizing effect of microtubule inhibition on mouse MO4 spheroidsin vitro.Microtubule and Microtubule Inhibitors, edited by M. De Brabander and J. De Mey (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tubiana, M., Henry-Amar, M., Breur, K., Vander Werf-Messing, B., andBurgers, M., 1979, Long-term results of the E.O.R.T.C. randomized study of irradiation and vinblastine in clinical stages I and II Hodgkin's disease.European Journal of Cancer,15, 645–657.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Who Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment, 1979, WHO Offset Publication No. 48 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).

  15. Woods, R. L.,Levi, J. A.,Page, J. J.,Raghavan, D.,Fox, R.,Tattersall, M.,Stuart-Harris, R., andByrne, M., 1985, Non small cell lung cancer: a randomised comparison of chemotherapy with no chemotherapy.Proceedings of the IVth World Conference on Lung Cancer, Toronto, Abstract 537, p. 38.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schallier, D.C., De Neve, W.J., De Greve, J.L. et al. Is adjuvant treatment with vinblastine effective in reducing the occurrence of distant metastasis in limited squamous cell lung cancer? A randomized study. Clin Exp Metast 6, 39–48 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580405

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580405

Keywords

Navigation