Skip to main content
Log in

Increase in clonal variation in Chinese hamster ovary cells after treatment with mutagens

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Clonal variation has been studied in CHO cells. The variant phenotype was an altered morphology of clones in agar: the parental CHO cells give rise to solid clumps of cells (wild-type colonies); occasionally, dispersed colonies arise, and the cells display an invasive growth in agar (INGA-type colonies). The frequency of this altered phenotype can be enhanced by treatment with a variety of mutagens (EMS, ENU, 4NQO, N-Ac-AAF, ultraviolet light, and X-irradiation). Enhancement was not due to a selective killing of wild-type cells or to a side-effect of cytotoxicity, which suggests that DNA damage is the cause of the altered phenotype. The INGA-trait breeds true, but most of the isolated clones have an inherent instability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Konrad, W.M., Storrie, B., Glaser, D.A., and Thompson, L.H. (1977).Cell 10:305–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lombardo, J.M., and Lanks, K.W. (1981).J. Cell. Physiol. 108:221–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubin, H., Romerdahl, C.A., and Chu, B.M. (1983).J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 70:1087–1096.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cifone, M.A., and Fidler, I.J. (1980).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:1039–1043.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, F.R. (1982).Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1:319–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollack, R., Risser, R., Conion, S., and Rilkin, D. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:4792–4796.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Somers, K.D. (1980).In vitro 16:851–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verschure, P.C.E.M., and Simons, J.W.I.M. (1982).Somat. Cell Genet. 8:307–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kripke, M.L., Gruys, E., and Fidler, I.J. (1978).Cancer Res. 38:2962–2967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson, G.L., Brunson, K.W., and Fidler, I.J. (1978).Cancer Res. 38:4105–4111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cifone, M.A. (1981).Exp. Cell Res. 131:435–441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, L.H., Busch, D.B., Brookman, K., Mooney, C.L., and Glaser, D.A. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3734–3737.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood, R.D., and Burki, H.J. (1982).Mutat. Res. 95:505–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeggo, P.A., and Kemp, L.M. (1983).Mutat. Res. 112:313–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zdzienicka, M.Z., Cupido, M. & Simons, J.W.I.M. Increase in clonal variation in Chinese hamster ovary cells after treatment with mutagens. Somat Cell Mol Genet 11, 127–134 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534701

Keywords

Navigation