Skip to main content
Log in

Apparent lack of effect of vaccination against mink enteritis virus (MEV). A challenge study

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The mink enteritis virus part of a triple vaccine was tested in mink. No raise in antibody response was measured after vaccination. Subsequent challenge of groups of vaccinated or not-vaccinated animals revealed no differences in virus excretion or antibody response in the different animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aasted B, Cohn A (1982) Inhibition of precipitation in counter current electrophoresis. A sensitive method for detection of mink antibodies to Aleutian disease virus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immuno Scand [C] 90: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azetaka M, Hirasawa T, Konishi S, Ogata M (1981) Studies on canine parvovirus isolation, experimental infection and serologic survey. Jpn J Vet Sci 43: 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouillant A, Hanson R (1965) Epizootiology of mink enteritis. I stability of the virus in feces exposed to natural environmental factors. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci 29: 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carman S, Povey C (1982) The failure of an inactivated mink enteritis virus vaccine in four preparations to provide protection to dogs against challenge with canine parvovirus-2. Can J Comp Med 46: 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmichael L, Joubert J, Pollock R (1980) Hemagglutination by canine parvovirus: serological studies and diagnostic applications. Am J Vet Res 41: 784–790

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farrell R, Burger D, Hartsough G, Gorham J (1972) Relationship of mink virus enteritis virus and feline panleucopenia virus: rapid onset of mink virus enteritis virus protection after feline panleucopenia virus infection. Am J Vet Res 33: 2351–2352

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gorham J, Hartsough G, Burger D, Lust D, Sato N (1965) The preliminary use of attenuated feline panleucopenia virus to protect cats against panleucopenia and mink against virus enteritis. Cornell Vet 55: 559–566

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson R (1967) Feline panleucopenia virus—in vitro comparison of strains with a mink enteritis virus. J Small Anim Pract 8: 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson R, Siegl G, Gautschi M (1974) Characteristics of feline panleucopenia virus strains enabling definite classification as parvoviruses. Arch Ges Virusforsch 46: 315–324

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krunajevic T (1970) Experimental virus enteritis in mink: a pathologic-anatomical and electron microscopical study. Acta Vet Scand [Suppl] 30: 1–88

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lei J (1982) Påvisning of antigen i fæces som hjælpemiddel i diagnostikken af virus enteritis hos mink. Proceedings 14th Nordic Veterinary Congress, Copenhagen, pp 365–367

  12. Parrish C, Carmichael L, Antczak D (1982) Antigenic relationships between canine parvovirus type 2, feline panleucopenia virus and mink enteritis virus using conventional antisera and monoclonal antibodies. Arch Virol 72: 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parrish C, Gorham J, Schwartz T, Carmichael L (1984) Characterization of antigenic variation among mink enteritis virus isolates. Am J Vet Res 45: 2591–2599

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pollock R, Carmichael L (1983) Use of modified live feline panleucopenia virus vaccine to immunize dogs against canine parvovirus. Am J Vet Res 44: 169–175

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivera E, Karlsson K-A, Bergman R (1987) The propagation of feline panleucopenia virus in microcarrier cell culture and use of the inactivated virus in the protectin of mink against viral enteritis. Vet Microbiol 13: 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schofield F (1949) Virus enteritis in mink. North Am Vet 30: 651–654

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wills G (1952) Notes on infectious enteritis of mink and its relationship to feline enteritis. Can J Comp Med 16: 419–420

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wills G, Belcher J (1956) The prevention of virus enteritis of mink with commercial feline panleucopenia vaccine. J Am Vet Med 559–560

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uttenthal, Å. Apparent lack of effect of vaccination against mink enteritis virus (MEV). A challenge study. Archives of Virology 99, 153–161 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01311066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01311066

Keywords

Navigation