Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic differentiation of disjunct populations of the antsFormica aquilonia andFormica lugubris in Europe

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The speciesFormica aquilonia andF. lugubris of the mound-building red wood ants have a disjunct boreoalpine distribution in Europe. The populations ofF. aquilonia in Finland, Switzerland and the British Isles show little genetic differentiation, whereas the populations ofF. lugubris show considerable differentiation. The Central European populations morphologically identified asF. lugubris can be genetically divided into two groups (here called types A and B). Type B is found in the Alps and the Jura mountains, and is genetically inseparable fromF. aquilonia. Type A lives sympatrically with type B in the Jura mountains and is also found in the British Isles. Sympatry of the two types in the Jura shows that these are separate species. It remains open whether type B is morphologically atypicalF. aquilonia or whether it is a separate species, perhaps with a past history of introgression betweenF. aquilonia andF. lugubris. The gene frequencies in the Finnish populations ofF. lugubris differ from those of both types A and B. Genetic differences withinF. lugubris indicate that the populations have evolved separately for a long time. The social structure ofF. lugubris colonies also shows geographic variation. The nests in Finland and the British Isles seem to be mainly monogynous and monodomous, whereas the nests in Central Europe are polygynous and form polydomous colonies.F. aquilonia has polygynous and polydomous colonies in all populations studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betrem, J. G., 1960. Über die Systematik derFormica rufa Gruppe.Tijdschr. Entomol. 103:51–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, J., 1977. The distribution ofFormica lugubris Zett. (Hym. Formicidae) in Ireland with a discussion of its possible introduction.Ir. Nat. J. 19:123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherix, D., 1980. Note préliminaire sur la structure, la phénologie et le régime alimentaire d'une super-colonie deFormica lugubris Zett.Ins. Soc. 27:226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherix, D., 1983. Intraspecific variations of alarm pheromones between two populations of the red wood antFormica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 56:57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherix, D., D. Chautems, D. J. C. Fletcher, W. Fortelius, G. Gris, L. Keller, L. Passera, R. Rosengren, E. L. Vargo and F. Walter, 1991. Alternative reproduction strategies inFormica lugubris Zett. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Ethol. Ecol. Evol. Special Issue 1:61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, C. A., 1964. The identification and distribution of British ants.Trans. Soc. Brit. Entomol. 16:93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douwes, P., 1981. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in workers of theFormica rufa group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Sweden.Entomol. Scand. Suppl. 15:213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, G. and B. S. Everitt, 1982.An introduction to mathematical taxonomy. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39:783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gösswald, K., G. Kneitz and G. Schirmer, 1965. Die geographische Verbreitung der hügelbauenden Formica-Arten (Hym., Formicidae) in Europa.Zool. Jahrb. Syst. 92:369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gris, G. and D. Cherix, 1977. Les grandes colonies de fourmis des bois du Jura (groupeFormica rufa).Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 50:249–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschtek-Jungen, E. and H. Jungen, 1976. Ant chromosomes I. The genusFormica.Ins. Soc. 23:513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutter, H., 1977. Hymenoptera, Formicidae.Insecta Helvetica 6:1–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1987.Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 512 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1982. Genetic population structure in polygynousFormica ants.Heredity 48:95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1984. Genotypic correlation and regression in social groups: multiple alleles, multiple loci and subdivided populations.Genetics 107:307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1987. Population genetics of theFormica rufa group. In:Chemistry and biology of social insects (J. Eder and H. Rembold, Eds), Verlag J. Peperny, München, pp. 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1989. Estimating relatedness in social groups.Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1990a. Statistical tests of phenograms based on genetic distances.Evolution 44:689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1990b. Comparison of relatedness estimators.Evolution 44:1378–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P. and R. Rosengren, 1984. Evolution of nesting strategies of ants: genetic evidence from different population types ofFormica ants.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 21:331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., R. Rosengren, K. Vepsäläinen, S. Varvio-Aho and B. Pisarski, 1978. Population genetics ofFormica ants I. Patterns of enzyme gene variation.Hereditas 89:233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., K. Vepsäläinen, R. Rosengren, S. Varvio-Aho and B. Pisarski, 1979. Population genetics ofFormica ants II. Genic differentiation between species.Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 45:65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, M., R. Rosengren and V. Söderlund, 1980. Chromosome numbers in the genusFormica with special reference to the taxonomical position ofFormica uralensis Ruzsk. andFormica truncorum Fabr.Hereditas 92:321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R. and D. Cherix, 1980. The pupa-carrying test as a taxonomic tool in theFormica rufa group. In:Biosystematics of social insects (P. E. Howse and J.-L. Clement, Eds), Academic Press, New York, pp. 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R. and P. Pamilo, 1983. The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-buildingFormica ants.Ada Entomol. Fenn. 42:65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, R., L. Sundström and W. Fortelius, (in prep) Monogyny and polygyny ofFormica ants - a result of alternative dispersal tactics? In:Queen number and social insects (L. Keller and D. Cherix, Eds)

  • Ross, K. G. and J. M. Carpenter, 1991. Phylogenetic analysis and the evolution of queen number in eusocial Hymenoptera.J. Evol. Biol. 4:117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B., 1991. The phenotypes of theFormica rufa complex in East Germany.Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus. Görlitz 65:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, L., 1989. Genetic relatedness and population structure inFormica truncorum.Actes Coll. Insectes Soc. 5:93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegelström, H., G. Nilsson and P.-I. Wyöni, 1983. Lack of species differences in isoelectric focused proteins in theFormica rufa group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Hereditas 98:161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1988.CANOCO. Groep Landbouwwiskunde, Wageningen, 95 pp.

  • Ward, P. S., 1989. Genetic and social changes associated with ant speciation. In:The genetics of social evolution (M. D. Breed and R. E. Page Jr, Eds), Westview Press, pp. 123–148.

  • Yarrow, I. H. H., 1955. The British ants allied toFormica rufa (Hym., Formicidae).Trans. Soc. Brit. Entomol. 12:1–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pamilo, P., Chautems, D. & Cherix, D. Genetic differentiation of disjunct populations of the antsFormica aquilonia andFormica lugubris in Europe. Ins. Soc 39, 15–29 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240528

Key words

Navigation