Skip to main content
Log in

Preperitoneal, minimally invasive, prosthetic groin hernia repair

  • Short Reports
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The study describes the advantages of using the positioning of the prosthesis in the pre-peritoneal space by a posterior approach in the repair of inguinal hernia. The research was carried out on 388 patients (372 (96%) men and 16 (4%) women), who had undergone hernioplasties with the insertion of a polypropylene prosthesis by a preperitoneal approach, between January 1994 and December 1996. 216 of these patients (56%) had an indirect inguinal hernia, 94 (24%) a direct inguinal hernia and 78 (20%) a double inguinal hernia (direct and indirect). In 21 cases (6%) it was a recurrent hernia. The following clinical parameters were considered: pain, sensitivity of the inguinal region, testicular pathology, wound pathology and recurrence. 384 patients out of 388 (99%) were discharged at latest one day after the operation. On average the patients went back to work 6 days after the operation. All the patients were checked at least three times out of four, with follow-ups at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the operation. In 13 patients (1.8%) there was a minor complication, in 3 patients (0.8%) we found an early recurrence due to technical error. We consider that positioning the prosthesis in the preperitoneal space using this minimally invasive procedure can be carried out easily and with very good clinical results in terms of typical early and/or late complications, which range from 2% to 20% by the anterior approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1992) Selecting synthetic mesh for repair of groin hernia. Postgrad Gen Surg 4: 150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JP (1987) Inguinal hernia repair with routine use of marlex mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165: 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassini E (1887) Sulla cura radicale dell'ernia inguinale. Arch Soc It Chir 4:379–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendavid R (1992) Prosthetics in hernia surgery: a confirmation. Postgrad Gen Surg 4: 166–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower S, Moore BB, Weiss SM (1996) Neuralgia after inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 62: 664–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanelli G (1993) La chirurgia ambulatoriale dellernia inguinale e crurale — Esperienza Personale. Minerva Medica Editore Torino

  • Corcione F, Cristino G, Maresca M, Cascone U, Titolo G, Califano G (1997) Primary inguinal hernia: the held in mesh repair. Hernia 1: 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmanoulidis T, Westenhoff D (1993) Bassini-Kirschner inguinal hernia surgery follow-up of 781 primary operations in adult men. Zentralbl Chir 118: 609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert AI (1992) Sutureless repair of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 163: 331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramegna A, Trimachi A, Noscita E, Secondo P (1998) Preliminary results of a new tecnique for inguinal hernia repair. Minerva Chir 53: 865–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, et al. (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicentric controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 222: 719–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Richter T, Meyer G, Schardey HM, Rau HG, Schldberg FW (1999) Transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). Results of 1000 completed operations. Zentralbl Chir 124: 657–663

    Google Scholar 

  • James E, McGillicuddy (1998) Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 133: 974–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsnorth AN, Gray MR, Nott DM (1992) Prospective controlled trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal repair. Br J Surg 79: 1068–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Kungel RD (1999) Minimally invasive non laparoscopic preperitoneal and sutureless inguinal herniorraphy. Am J Surg 178: 298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty PM, Malinowska A, Pelta D (1998) Lichtenstein inguinal repair in primary healthcare setting. B J Surg 85: 793–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montlor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157: 188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, et al. (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225: 422–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan KW, Deziel DJ (1996) The management of hernia: consideration in cost effectiveness. Surg Clin North Am 76: 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Morfesis FA (1996) The recurrence rate in hernia surgery. Arch Surg 131: 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahabedian NY, Dellon AL (1997) Outcome of the operative management of nerve injuries in the ilio-inguinal region. J Am Coll Surg 184: 265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus LM, Condon RE, Harkins HN (1960) Clinical experiences with preperitoneal hernia repair for all types of hernia of the groin. Am J Surg 100: 234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Rignault DP (1986) Properitoneal prosthetic hernioplasty through a Pfannenstiel approach. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163: 465–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Rives JL, Stoppa RE, Fortesa L, Nicaise H (1968) Les pièces en Dacron et leur place dans la chirurgie des hernies de l'aine. Ann Chir 22: 159

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulli F, Percudani M, Muzi M, Tucci G, Sianesi M (1998) From Bassini to tension-free mesh hernia repair. Review of 1409 consecutive cases. G Chir 19: 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkow IM (1993) “Tension free” inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the “mesh plug” tecnique. Surgery 114: 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkow IM (1995) The recurrence rate in hernia surgery. Arch Surg 130: 575–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimitz R, Schimitz N, Treckmann J, Shah S (1999) Long-term results after tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Chirurgia 70: 1014–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL (1992) The safety of mesh repair for primay inguinal hernias: results of 3019 operations from five diverse surgical sources. Am Surg 58: 255–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoppa RE (1989) The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic repair of groin hernia, In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE, eds. Hernia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; pp 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Taschieri AM, Danelli PG, Kurihara H, Montecamozzo G, Porretta T, Molteni B (1998) Lernioalloplastica con protesi preperitoneale per via inguinale anteriore in anestesia locale. Chirurgia 11: 352–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Topla B, Hourlay P (1997) Totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 84: 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wantz GE (1996) Experience with the tensionfree hernioplasty for primary inguinal hernias in men. J Am Coll Surg 183: 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotti GC, Fimmanó A, Micheletti G, Sessa E, Navarra S (1992) II problema delle recidive dellernia inguinale. Valutazione fisiopatologiche e cliniche. Atti V SPIGC-Vol. II pp 797–804. Ed Lantologia, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotti GC, Manfredini S, Micheletti G, Sessa E, Navarra S, Ghiggi S (1991) Le recidive dopo intervenu per ernia inguinale. Revisione clinica. It J Ped Surg Sci 5: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotti GC, Manfredini S, Micheletti G, Testa S, Navarra S, Sessa E (1994) Reattività tissutale immediata e tardiva alle protesi sintetiche. Studio sperimentale. Chirurgia Generale General Surgery 15: 65–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. Zotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zotti, G.C., Mancuso, M., Giuliani, A. et al. Preperitoneal, minimally invasive, prosthetic groin hernia repair. Hernia 4, 316–320 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201093

Key words

Navigation