Skip to main content
Log in

Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: Comparison of bioassay systems for water quality

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three mouse embryo bioassays [mouse one-cell and two-cell embryos and in vitro fertilization (IVF)] were tested for their ability to discriminate between three sources of water for medium preparation: tap water, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water, and Milli-Q purified water. No differences could be detected using these assays. The lack of sensitivity of the mouse bioassays could not be attributed to the protein source or medium type. The hamster sperm motility assay (HSMA) permitted quantitative discrimination between water sources (Milli-Q > HPLC > tap). Media prepared for use in human IVF using water that exceeded minimal HSMA quality standards resulted in pregnancy rates that were greater than those attained with a lot of HPLC water that did not meet these standards. The HSMA can serve as a basis for a quality-control program in the human IVF laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whittingham DG: Culture of mouse ova. J Reprod Fertil (Suppl) 1971;14:7–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fukuda A, Noda Y, Tsukui S, Matsumoto H, Yano J, Mori T: Influences of water quality on in vitro fertilization and embryo development for the mouse. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ackerman SB, Stokes GL, Swanson RJ, Taylor SP, Fenwick L: Toxicity testing for human in vitro fertilization programs. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1985;2:132

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parinaud J, Reme J, Monrozies X, Favrin S, Sarramon M, Pontonnier G: Mouse system quality control is necessary before the use of new material for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman IH, Cook CL, Sanfilippo JS, Yussman MA, Schultz GS, Hilton FH: Ham's F-10 constituted with tap water supports mouse conceptus development in vitro. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1987;4:185

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bavister BD, Andrews JC: A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lapata A: Concepts in human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1983;40:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biggers JD, Whitten WK, Whittingham DG: The culture of mouse embryos in vitro.In Methods in Mammalian Embryology, JC Daniel (ed). San Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1971, pp 86–116

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quinn P, Warnes GM, Kerin JF, Kirby: Culture factors in relation to the success of human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1984;41:202

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerrity M: Mouse embryo culture bioassay.In In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: A Manual of Basic Techniques, DP Wolf, BD Bavister, M Gerrity, G Kopf (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bavister BD, Yanagimachi R: The effects of sperm extracts and energy sources on the motility and acrosome reactions of hamster spermatozoa in vitro. Biol Reprod 1977;19:228

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bavister BD: The effect of variations in culture conditions on the motility of hamster spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1974;38:431–440

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cholewa JA, Whitten WK: Development of two-cell mouse embryos in the absence of a fixed nitrogen source. J Repord Fertil 1970;22:553

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wramsby H, Fridga K, Liedholm P: Chromosome analysis of human oocytes recovered from preovulatory follicles in stimulated cycles. N Engl J Med 1987;316:121

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ: Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil Steril 1982;38:447

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schlesselman JJ: How does one assess the risk of abnormalities from human in vitro fertilization? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:135

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones HW, Jones GS, Andrews MC, Acosta A, Bundren C, Garcia J, Sandow B, Veeck L, Wilkes C, Witmyer J, Wortham JE, Wright G: The program for in vitro fertilization at Norfolk. Fertil Steril 1982;38:14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chetkowski RJ, Nass TE, Matt DW, Hamilton F, Steingold KA, Randle D, Meldrum DR: Optimization of hydrogen-ion concentration during aspiration of oocytes and culture and transfer of embryos. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1985;2:207

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yovich JL, Edirisinghe W, Yovich JM, Stanger J and Matson P: Methods of water purification for the preparation of culture media in an IVF-ET programme. Hum Reprod 1988;3:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trounson A, Conto A: Research in human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Br Med J 1984;285:244

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming TP, Pratt HPM, Braude PR: The use of mouse preimplantation embryos for quality control of culture reagents in human in vitro fertilization programs. A cautionary note. Fertil Steril 1987;47:858

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arny M, Nachtigall L, Quagliarello J: The effect of preimplantation culture conditions on murine embryo implantation and fetal development. Fertil Steril 1987;48:861

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reust J, Meyer V: Determination of organic contaminants in ultra-pure water by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Analyst 107:673–679

  24. College of American Pathologists, Commission on Laboratory Inspection and Accreditation: Reagent water specifications.

  25. Galber R, Hegde R, Hughes D: Degradation of high purity water on storage. J Liq Chromatogr 1983;6:2565–2570

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spindle AI, Pedersen RA: Hatching, attachment and out-growth of mouse blastocysts in vitro; Fixed nitrogen requirements. J Exp Zool 1973;186:305–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rinehart, J.S., Bavister, B.D. & Gerrity, M. Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: Comparison of bioassay systems for water quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 5, 335–342 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129569

Key Words

Navigation