Skip to main content
Log in

Internalistic foundationalism and the justification of memory belief

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I argue that internalistic foundationalist theories of the justification of memory belief are inadequate. Taking a discussion of John Pollock as a starting point, I argue against any theory that requires a memory belief to be based on a phenomenal state in order to be justified. I then consider another version of internalistic foundationalism and claim that it, too, is open to important objections. Finally, I note that both varieties of foundationalism fail to account for the epistemic status of our justified nonoccurrent beliefs, and hence are drastically incomplete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, William P.: 1985, ‘Concepts of Epistemic Justification’,The Monist 68, 57–89 (reprinted in Alston 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William P.: 1989,Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R.: 1983,The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert: 1988,Belief, Justification, and Knowledge, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BonJour, Laurence: 1986,The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Henry C. and R. Reed Hunt: 1987,Fundamentals of Human Memory and Cognition, 3rd ed., Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Richard: 1988, ‘Having Evidence’, in David Austin (ed.),Philosophical Analysis: A Defense by Example, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin: 1988, ‘Weak and Strong Justification’, in Tomberlin (1988), pp. 51–69.

  • Harman, Gilbert: 1986,Change In View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, Hilary: 1983, ‘Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action’,Philosophical Review 92, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, Keith: 1990,Theory of Knowledge, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. B. and Max Deutscher: 1966, ‘Remembering’,Philosophical Review 65, 161–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, George: 1980, ‘Lost Justification’, in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.),Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Volume V (1980), Epistemology, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin: 1992,Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1986,Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John: 1974,Knowledge and Justification, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomberlin, James E. (ed.): 1988,Philosophical Perspectives 2: Epistemology 1988, Ridgeview Pub. Co., Atascadero, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senor, T.D. Internalistic foundationalism and the justification of memory belief. Synthese 94, 453–476 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064489

Keywords

Navigation