Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of model indistinguishability in pharmacokinetics

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of model indistinguishability is introduced in the context of linear compartmental models in pharmacokinetics. The two most widely used methods of analyzing model indistinguishability are described. It is shown that as the number of compartments increases, one approach, based on the Laplace transforms of the observations, although conceptually simple, can result in very large numbers of candidate models to be examined for indistinguishability, while the other approach, based on similarity transformations, although systematic, often results in very difficult algebraic expressions. These problems can be eased by the use of some simple geometrical rules, used at the outset of an indistinguishability analysis. The approach is illustrated by application to two 2-compartment drug, 2-compartment metabolite models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. G. Wagner. Do you need a pharmacokinetic model and, if so, which one?J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 3:457–478 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. P. Corfmat and A. S. Morse. Structurally controllable and structurally canonical systems.IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-21:129–131 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. J. Davison. Connectability and structural controllability of composite systems.Automatica 13:109–123 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. M. Zazworsky and H. K. Knudsen. Controllability and observability of linear time invariant compartmental modelsIEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-23:872–877 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Hayakawa, S. Hosoe, M. Hayashi, and M. Ito. On the structural controllability of compartmental systems.IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-29:17–24 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Vajda. Structural equivalence of linear systems and compartmental models.Math. Biosci. 55:39–64 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Walter.Identifiability of State Space Models. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics No. 46, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Venot, E. Walter, Y. Lecourtier, A. Raksanyi, and L. Chauvelot-Moachon. Structural identifiability of “first pass” models.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 15:179–189 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Chapman and K. R. Godfrey. The problem of structural equivalence in biomedical system models.3rd IMEKO Conference on Measurement in Clinical Medicine, Edinburgh, September 1986, Institute of Measurement and Control, pp. 213–219.

  10. Y. Lecourtier, E. Walter, and P. Bertrand. Methods for the study of unidentifiable state space models.Trans. Inst. Meas. Cont. 3:21–27 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Walter and Y. Lecourtier. Unidentifiable compartmental models: what to do?Math. Biosci. 56:1–25 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Vajda. Structural equivalence and exhaustive compartmental modeling.Math. Biosci. 69:57–75 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Walter, Y. Lecourtier, A. Raksanyi, and J. Happel. On the distinguishability of parametric models with different structures. In J. Eisenfeld and C. DeLisi (eds.),Mathematics and Computers in Biomedical Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Raksanyi, Y. Lecourtier, E. Walter, and A. Venot. Identifiability and distinguishability testing via computer algebra.Math. Biosci. 77:245–266 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Walter, Y. Lecourtier, J. Happel, and J.-Y. Kao. Identifiability and distinguishability of fundamental parameters in catalytic methanation.Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs. 32:1360–1366 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. J. Chapman and K. R. Godfrey. On structural equivalence and identifiability constraint ordering. In E. Walter (ed.),Structural Identifiability of Parametric Models, Pergamon, New York, 1987, pp. 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rowland, L. Z. Benet, and S. Riegelman. Two-compartment model for a drug and its metabolite: application to acetylsalicyclic acid pharmacokinetics.J. Pharm. Sci. 59:364–367 (1970).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Milanese and G. P. Molino. Structural identifiability of compartmental models and pathophysiological information from the kinetics of drugs.Math. Biosci. 26:175–190 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Milanese and G. Belforte. Structural problems in identification, state estimation and aggregation.Large Scale Syst. 2:97–104 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.Pharmacokinetics, 1st ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975, pp. 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. G. Boxenbaum and S. Riegelman. Pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and some metabolites in man.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm,4:287–325 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey, K.R., Chapman, M.J. The problem of model indistinguishability in pharmacokinetics. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 17, 229–267 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059030

Key words

Navigation