Skip to main content
Log in

Sin, narcissism, and the changing face of conversion

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noting that current psychological discussions of conversion give far less attention to the “sense of sin” than did William James and his contemporaries, this article argues for renewed attention to sin and its role in the conversion experience. Using data from a survey of Christian laity on their attitudes toward the traditional deadly sins, the author concludes that the sins that trouble men and women today involve their narcissistic needs. As many seek relief from the “tyranny” of their narcissistic needs, the author contends that what would constitute conversion for them is the “transformation” of narcissism. Typical candidates for such conversion are adults, not adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James, W.,The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York, The New American Library, 1958, p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menninger, K.,Whatever Became of Sin? New York, Hawthorn Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scroggs, J.R., and Douglas, W.G.T., “Issues in the Psychology of Religious Conversion,”J. Religion and Health, 1967,6, 204–216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scobie, G.E.W.,Psychology of Religion. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1975, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spilka, B.; Hood, R.W., Jr.; and Gorsuch, R.L.,The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1985, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 193–194, 305–306.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oates, W.E.,The Psychology of Religion. Waco, Texas, Word Books, 1973, ch. 14; Crapps, R.W.,An Introduction to Psychology of Religion. Macon, Georgia, Mercer University Press, 1986, pp. 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  13. op. cit., pp. 207–208.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Capps, D.,Deadly Sins and Saving Virtues. Philadelphia, Fortress Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SeeThe Ancrene Riwle, M. Salu, trans. Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame, 1956, p. 90. This text, comprising the anchorite rule, portrays the deadly sins as animals and reptiles one encounters in the wilderness through which one passes to the promised land: Lion (pride), Serpent (envy), Unicorn (anger), Bear (sloth), Fox (greed), Sow (gluttony), and Scorpion (lust). Each, of course, has offspring, enabling the author to delineate sins related to the deadly sin, giving the deadly sin a multi-dimensional or systemic aura. I am indebted to Sarah Hamilton, a graduate student at Princeton Theological Seminary, for bringing this text to my attention.

  17. A fuller account of the results of this study, with tables, is provided in my, “Deadly Sins and Saving Virtues: How They Are Viewed by Laity,”Pastoral Psychology, 1989, 37, 229–253.

  18. Lasch, C.,The Culture of Narcissism. New York, Warner Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kernberg, O., summarized in Lowen, A.,Narcissism: Denial of the True Self. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1985, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seeop. cit., ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kohut, H., “Forms and Transformations of Narcissism.” In Ornstein, P.H., ed.,The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut 1950–1978, vol. 1. New York, International Universities Press, 1978, ch. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dittes, J.E.,When Work Goes Sour: A Male Perspective. Philadelphia, The Westminster Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chernin, K.,The Hungry Self: Women, Eating and Identity. New York, Harper and Row, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Capps, D., “Religion and Psychological Well-Being.” In Hammond, P.E., ed.,The Sacred in a Secular Age: Toward Revision in the Scientific Study of Religion. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985, pp. 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cf. Bellah, R.N.,et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985; Bellah, R.N., “The Quest for the Self: Individualism, Morality, Politics.” In Rabinow, P., and Sullivan, W.M., eds.,Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1987, pp. 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luckmann, T.,The Invisible Religion. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1967, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Watzlawick, P.,The Situation Is Hopeless, But Not Serious: The Pursuit of Unhappiness. New York, W.W. Norton, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capps, D. Sin, narcissism, and the changing face of conversion. J Relig Health 29, 233–251 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000947

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000947

Keywords

Navigation