Abstract
Noting that current psychological discussions of conversion give far less attention to the “sense of sin” than did William James and his contemporaries, this article argues for renewed attention to sin and its role in the conversion experience. Using data from a survey of Christian laity on their attitudes toward the traditional deadly sins, the author concludes that the sins that trouble men and women today involve their narcissistic needs. As many seek relief from the “tyranny” of their narcissistic needs, the author contends that what would constitute conversion for them is the “transformation” of narcissism. Typical candidates for such conversion are adults, not adolescents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
James, W.,The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York, The New American Library, 1958, p. 157.
Ibid., p. 164.
Ibid., p. 167.
Ibid., p. 164.
Ibid., p. 165.
Ibid., p. 171.
Menninger, K.,Whatever Became of Sin? New York, Hawthorn Books, 1973.
Scroggs, J.R., and Douglas, W.G.T., “Issues in the Psychology of Religious Conversion,”J. Religion and Health, 1967,6, 204–216.
Scobie, G.E.W.,Psychology of Religion. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1975, p. 47.
Spilka, B.; Hood, R.W., Jr.; and Gorsuch, R.L.,The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1985, p. 223.
Ibid., p. 193–194, 305–306.
Oates, W.E.,The Psychology of Religion. Waco, Texas, Word Books, 1973, ch. 14; Crapps, R.W.,An Introduction to Psychology of Religion. Macon, Georgia, Mercer University Press, 1986, pp. 242–251.
op. cit., pp. 207–208.
Capps, D.,Deadly Sins and Saving Virtues. Philadelphia, Fortress Press, 1987.
Ibid., p. 23.
SeeThe Ancrene Riwle, M. Salu, trans. Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame, 1956, p. 90. This text, comprising the anchorite rule, portrays the deadly sins as animals and reptiles one encounters in the wilderness through which one passes to the promised land: Lion (pride), Serpent (envy), Unicorn (anger), Bear (sloth), Fox (greed), Sow (gluttony), and Scorpion (lust). Each, of course, has offspring, enabling the author to delineate sins related to the deadly sin, giving the deadly sin a multi-dimensional or systemic aura. I am indebted to Sarah Hamilton, a graduate student at Princeton Theological Seminary, for bringing this text to my attention.
A fuller account of the results of this study, with tables, is provided in my, “Deadly Sins and Saving Virtues: How They Are Viewed by Laity,”Pastoral Psychology, 1989, 37, 229–253.
Lasch, C.,The Culture of Narcissism. New York, Warner Books, 1979.
Kernberg, O., summarized in Lowen, A.,Narcissism: Denial of the True Self. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1985, p. 6.
Seeop. cit., ch. 2.
Kohut, H., “Forms and Transformations of Narcissism.” In Ornstein, P.H., ed.,The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut 1950–1978, vol. 1. New York, International Universities Press, 1978, ch. 32.
Dittes, J.E.,When Work Goes Sour: A Male Perspective. Philadelphia, The Westminster Press, 1987.
Chernin, K.,The Hungry Self: Women, Eating and Identity. New York, Harper and Row, 1985.
Capps, D., “Religion and Psychological Well-Being.” In Hammond, P.E., ed.,The Sacred in a Secular Age: Toward Revision in the Scientific Study of Religion. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985, pp. 252–254.
Cf. Bellah, R.N.,et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1985; Bellah, R.N., “The Quest for the Self: Individualism, Morality, Politics.” In Rabinow, P., and Sullivan, W.M., eds.,Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1987, pp. 365–383.
Luckmann, T.,The Invisible Religion. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1967, p. 48.
See Watzlawick, P.,The Situation Is Hopeless, But Not Serious: The Pursuit of Unhappiness. New York, W.W. Norton, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capps, D. Sin, narcissism, and the changing face of conversion. J Relig Health 29, 233–251 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000947
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000947