Skip to main content
Log in

Two ways of formalizing grammars

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Carpenter, R.: 1992,The Logic of Typed Feature Structures, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 32, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. and D. S. Warren: 1989,Abductive Logic Programming, m.s., Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1988,Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation, m.s., Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Clark, K. L.: 1978, ‘Negation as Failure’, in H. Gallaire and J. Minker (eds.),Logic and Databases, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmerauer, A.: 1978, ‘Metamorphosis Grammars’, in Leonard Bloc (ed.),Natural Language Communication with Computers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R.: 1990, ‘Finite-Model Theory — a Personal Perspective’, in S. Abiteboul and P. C. Kannellakis (eds.),ICDT '90: 3rd International Conference on Database Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallier, J.: 1986,Logic for Computer Science, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhfeld, M. and G. Smolka: 1988,Definite Relations over Constraint Languages, LILOG Report 53, IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1988,Attribute Value Logic and the Theory of Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes Series, University of Chicago Press.

  • Johnson, M.: 1990a, ‘Expressing Disjunctive and Negative Feature Constraints in Classical First-Order Logic’,Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

  • Johnson, M.: 1990b, ‘Features, Frames and Quantifier-Free Formulae’, in P. Saint-Dizier and S. Szpakowicz (eds.),Logic and Logic Grammars for Language Processing, Ellis Horwood, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1991a, ‘Features and Formulae’,Computational Linguistics 17(1), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.: 1991b, ‘Logic and Feature Structures’,Proceedings of IJCAI-91, Sydney, Australia.

  • Johnson, M.: to appear, ‘Computing with Features as Formulae’,Computational Linguistics.

  • Kaplan, R. and J. Bresnan: 1982, ‘Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation’, in J. Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, The MIT Press.

  • Kasper, R. and W. Rounds: 1990, ‘The logic of Unification in Grammar’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13(1), 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, M.: 1979, ‘Functional Unification Grammar’,Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Association, Berkeley, California.

  • Lloyd, J. W.: 1984,Foundations of Logic Programming, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster-Ramer, A. and W. Rounds: 1987, ‘A Logical Version of Functional Grammar’,Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and Oppen, D. C.: 1980, ‘Fast Decision Procedures Based on Congruence Closure’,J. ACM 27(2), 356–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F.: 1982,Logic for Natural Language Analysis, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Edinburgh. Reprinted as Technical Note 275, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F. and S. Shieber: 1984, ‘The Semantics of Grammar Formalisms seen as Computer Languages’,The Proceedings of COLINC 1984 Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F. and S. Shieber: 1987,Prolog for Natural Language Analysis, CSLI Lecture Notes Series, University of Chicago Press.

  • Pereira, F. and D. H. D. Warren: 1983, ‘Parsing as Deduction’,Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C. and I. Sag: 1988,Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes Series, University of Chicago Press.

  • Rounds, W. C.: 1988, ‘LFP: A Logic for Linguistic Descriptions and an Analysis of its Complexity’,Computational Linguistics 14(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabler, E.: 1992,The Logical Approach to Syntax: Foundations, Specifications and Implementations of Theories of Government and Binding. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S.: 1986,An Introduction to Unification-Based Theories of Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes Series, University of Chicago Press.

  • Shieber, S.: 1992,Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolka, G.: 1992, ‘Feature-Constraint Logics for Unification Grammars’,Journal of Logic Programming 12(1&2), 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Edward Stabler and an anonymousL&P reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Of course, all responsibility for errors in this paper rests with me.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, M. Two ways of formalizing grammars. Linguist Philos 17, 221–248 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985036

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985036

Keywords

Navigation