Skip to main content
Log in

Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed the variability of point-wise static threshold values and the components of fluctuation outside the central 30° field in 20 normal individuals tested on the Humphrey field analyzer. We found a mean short-term fluctuation of 2.37 dB, a long-term heterogeneous fluctuation of 5.28 dB, and a long-term homogeneous fluctuation of 1.10 dB. All components of fluctuation were greatest superiorly. Point-wise variation was highest superiorly and nasally and increased with greater eccentricity from fixation in all but the temporal quadrant. Also, point-wise variation was greater between individual than between tests in a single individual. This study suggests that outside the central 30° field, changes in individual threshold measurements in the superior and nasal quadrants should be greater than those in the temporal or inferior quadrants before they can be distinguished from normal variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenton RS, Argus WA (1987) Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:767–771

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Field Analyzer Owner's Manual (1986) Allergan Humphrey, San Leadro, California, pp 6–30

  3. Flammer J, Drance SM, Schulzer M (1983) The estimation and testing of the components of long term fluctuation of the differential light threshold. In: Greve EL, Heijl A (eds) Fifth International Visual Field Symposium. Junk, The Hague, pp 383–389

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M (1984) Differential light threshold. Short- und long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102:704–706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flammer J, Drance SM, Fankhauser F, Augustiny L (1984) Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 102:876–879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Graybill FA (1961) Introduction to linear statistical models, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 349–351

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) Normal variability of the static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1544–1549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz J, Sommer A (1986) Assymetry and variation in the normal hill of vision. Arch Ophthalmol 104:65–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parrish RK, Schiffman J, Anderson D (1984) Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1497–1502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seamone C, LeBlanc R, Rubillowicz M, Mann C, Orr A (1988) The value of indices in the central and peripheral visual fields for the detection of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 106:180–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Werner EB, Saheb N, Thomas D (1982) Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs. Arch Ophthalmol 100:1627–1631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wild JM, Wood JM, Crews SJ (1988) Peripheral refractive correction and automated perimetric profiles. Acta Ophthalmol 66:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zalta AH (1989) Lens rim artifact in automated threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 96:1302–1311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, W.O., Stewart, W.C., Hunt, H. et al. Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228, 454–457 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00927261

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00927261

Keywords

Navigation