Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy

  • Original Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were monitored in the course of 368 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) carried out in 312 patients. In an initial group of 26 patients the shunt was used routinely while in a second group, involving 342 CEAs, it was applied selectively on the basis of modifications which the SEP underwent during clamping. The criterion for shunting was the progressive reduction, up to 50%, of the N20-P25 amplitude. New postoperative neurological deficits appeared in 6 patients, all of whom displayed a transitory SEP flattening. The SEPs of 2 of these returned to normal by the time they awoke and both showed a clinical deficit homolateral to the operated side. In only 2 cases did the deficit fail to regress completely and their postoperative CT scans revealed ischaemic lesions. A positive relationship emerged between SEP changes and back pressure values; nonetheless, as many as 75% of the patients with low residual back pressure values (< 25 mm Hg) tolerated the clamping. SEP monitoring appears to provide a reliable basis for selectively applying a shunt when there is a high risk of haemodynamic ischaemia during clamping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerstaff RGA, Krul JMJ, Eikelboom BC, Vermeulen FEE (1990) Automatic EEG monitoring and stroke detection during carotid endarterectomy. Neurophysiol Clin 20: S23

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astrup J (1981) Energy-requiring cell functions in the ischemic brain: their critical supply and possible inhibition in protective therapy. J Neurosurg 54:482–497

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astrup J, Siejo BK, Symon L (1981) Threshold in cerebral ischemia — the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 12:723–725

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beven EG (1975) Carotid endarterectomy. Surg Clin North Am 55:1111–1124

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blume WT, Ferguson GG, McNeill DK (1986) Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 17:891–897

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boysen G (1971) Cerebral blood flow measurement as a safeguard during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Branston NM, Symon L, Crockard HA, Pasztor E (1974) Relationship between the cortical evoked potentials and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral occlusion in the baboon. Exp Neurol 45:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiappa KH, Burke SR, Young RR (1979) Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 367 carotid endarterectomies. Stroke 10:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collice M, Arena O, Fontana RA, Mola M, Galbiati N (1986) Role of EEG monitoring and cross-clamping duration in carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 65:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  10. Connolly JE, Kwann JHM, Stemmer EA (1977) Improved results with carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg 186:334–342

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Scisciolo G, Amantini A, Ronchi O, Bartelli M, Peduto A, Paci C, Pratesi C, Alessi A, Pinto F (1988) SEP monitoring during carotid surgery. In: Grundy BL, Villani RM (eds) Evoked potentials. Springer, Wien NewYork, pp 121–127

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Vleschauwer P, Horsch S, Haupt WF, Huber P (1985) The use of somatosensory evoked responses in carotid surgery for monitoring brain function. Acta Chir Belg 85:293–298

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fava E, Ducati A, Bortolani E, Miani S (1990) Role of SEP monitoring in selection of patients requiring temporary shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Neurophysiol Clin 20:S22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferguson GG (1982) Intra-operative monitoring and internal shunt: are they necessary in carotid endarterectomy? Stroke 13:287–289

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gigli GL, Caramia M, Marciani MG, Zarola F, Iavaroni F, Rossini PM (1987) Monitoring of subcortical and cortical evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68:424–432

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grundy BL (1983) Intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 58:72–87

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunter G, Sieffert G, Malone J, Moore GS (1981) The accuracy of carotid back pressure as a guide for operative management for carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 13:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  18. Markand ON, Dilley RS, Morthy SS, Warren C (1984) Monitoring of somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiolog 41:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumoto GH, Baker JD, Watson CW, Gleucklich B, Callow AD (1976) EEG surveillance as a means of extending operability in high risk carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 7:554–559

    Google Scholar 

  20. McKey R, Dundt T, Mickenfelder J, Gronert T, Messick J, Sharborough F, Piepgrass D (1976) Internal carotid artery stump pressure and cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 45:390–399

    Google Scholar 

  21. McPherson AW, Zeger S, Traystman RJ (1986) Cerebral oxygen consumption during hypoxic hypoxia in dogs. Stroke 17:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  22. McPherson RW, Sell B, Traystman RJ (1986) Effects of thiopental, fentanyl end etomidate on upper extremity somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Anesthesiology 65:584–589

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mola M, Collice M, Levati A (1986) Continuous intraoperative electroencephalographic monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Eur Neurol 25:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore WS, Yee JM, Hall AD (1973) Collateral cerebral blood pressure: an index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion. Arch Surg 106:520–523

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ojemann RG, Heros RC (1986) Carotid endarterectomy. To shunt or not to shunt? Arch Neurol 43:617–618

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pinto F, Ragazzoni A, Amantini A, Scisciolo G de, Bartelli M, Rossi R, Pieraccioli E (1990) Anesthetic induction with thiopental: its effect on scalp topography of median nerve somatosensory evoked potential. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 34:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  27. Russ W, Fraedrich G, Hehrlein FW, Hempelmann G (1985) Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials as a prognostic factor of neurologic state after carotid endarterectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 33:392–396

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spetzler RF, Nehls DG, Awad IA (1990) Vascular surgery of cerebral ischemia and infarction. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, Klawans HL (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, revised series 9: vascular diseases, part 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 447

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sundt TM, Sharbrough FW, Piepgrass DG, Kearns TP, Messick GM, O'Fallon W (1981) Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 56:533–543

    Google Scholar 

  30. Symon L, Wang AD, Costa e Silva IE, Gentili F (1984) Perioperative use of somatosensory evoked responses in aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 60:269–275

    Google Scholar 

  31. Symon L, Wang AD, Rosestein J, Branston N, Tsutsui T (1985) Effect of brain ischemia on evoked electrical activity in man. J Cereb Flow Metab 5:S37-S38

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thompson JE (1979) Complications of carotid endarterectomy and their prevention. World J Surg 3:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trazzi R, Massei R, Lubatti L, Bortolani E, Fava E, Landi A, Cenzato M, Ducati A (1985) Valutazioni neurologiche in anestesia e rianimazione. Minerva Anestesiol 51:243–251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amantini, A., Bartellil, M., de Scisciolo, G. et al. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol 239, 241–247 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00810344

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00810344

Key words

Navigation