Skip to main content
Log in

Antibody preference for the catalytically active form of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The catalytically inactivating subset within rabbit serum polyclonal antibody to the solubilized, purified 55,000 to 60,000 dalton active fragment of rat liver microsomal β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase immunoinactivates this enzyme with little or no diminution of effect by enzyme catalytically inactivated by incubation of microsomes with ATP,Mg++. Reactivation of inactive enzyme with ethanol-treated rat liver phosphatase restores antibody affinity showing that the catalytically inactivating subset of antibody exhibits marked or complete affinity for the active enzyme over the ATP,Mg++-inactivated form. This means that immunoinactivation using this antibody is not a valid way of measuring changes in the specific activity of the enzyme via phosphorylation-dephosphorylation. Preference for the active enzyme has not been obvious because when different amounts of enzyme activity are used in immunotitrations of samples of low activity, apparent differences in specific activity are observed when none actually exist. If precautions are not taken, results are obtained supporting phosphorylation by using an antibody that is not capable of distinguishing it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arebalo, R. E., Hardgrave, J. E., Noland, B. J., and Scallen, T. J. (1980).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 6429–6433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arebalo, R. E., Tormanen, C. D., Hardgrave, J. E., Noland, B. J., and Scallen, T. J. (1982a).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arebalo, R. E., Hardgrave, J. E., and Scallen, T. J. (1982b).Fed. Proc. 41 1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, H., Capulong, Z. L., and Lee, E. Y. C. (1975).J. Biol. Chem. 250 8038–8044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beg, Z. H., and Brewer, H. B. (1982).Fed. Proc. 41 2634–2638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beg, Z. H., Stonik, J. A., and Brewer, H. B. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 3678–3682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beg, Z. H., Stonik, J. A., and Brewer, H. B. (1980).J. Biol. Chem. 255 8541–8545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, R. E., Baker, T. A., and Porter, J. W. (1982).Eur. J. Biochem. 125 497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. A., Lemongello, D., and Fogelman, A. M. (1979).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 574 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. A., Lemongello, D., Kane, J., Shechter, I., and Fogelman, A. M. (1980).J. Biol. Chem. 255 3715–3725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, G., Sitges, M., Bove, J., and Hegardt, F. G. (1980).FEBS Lett. 110 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, G., Sitges, M., and Hegardt, F. G. (1981).Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 210 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, S., and Pitot, H. C. (1971).J. Lipid Res. 12 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardgrave, J. E., Heller, R. A., Herrera, M. G., and Scallen, T. J. (1979).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 3834–3838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenke, H.-S., Lowel, M., and Berndt, J. (1981).J. Biol. Chem. 256 9622–9625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, M. L., Rodwell, V. W., Rogers, D. H., and Rudney, H. (1979).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 90 969–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsek, D. A., Jabalquinto, A. M., and Porter, J. W. (1980).J. Biol. Chem. 255 3918–3923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsek, D. A., Dugan, R. E., Baker, T. A., and Porter, J. W. (1981).Methods Enzymol. 71 462–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, G. C. (1983).Mol. Cell. Biochem. 53/54 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, G. C., Spindler, C. D., and Benton, G. A. (1980).J. Biol. Chem. 255 9013–9016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, G. C., Benton, G. A., Deiter, S. A., and Wickham, P. S. (1982).Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 214 705–713.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

J. W. Porter died June 27th, 1984 after a valiant struggle against cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dugan, R.E., Porter, J.W. Antibody preference for the catalytically active form of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. J Bioenerg Biomembr 16, 551–560 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00743245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00743245

Key Words

Navigation