Skip to main content
Log in

Concurrent abnormal expression of ERBB-2, EGFR, and p53 genes and clinical disease progression of breast carcinoma

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metastatic phenotype in human solid tumors is believed to follow stochastic acquisition of structural genetic aberrations-so-called multistep tumor progression. We tested this hypothesis in breast carcinoma by immunostaining 89 stage-heterogeneous cases for the products of three genes (p53, ERBB-2, and EGFR) which are frequently altered in this tumor system. Variable relationships were observed between advanced disease stage and immunostaining for individual gene products (ERBB-2 - p = 0.05, EGFR - p = 0.02, p53 - p = 0.12, Chi Square test). Regional or distant metastases at presentation correlated with multiple oncogene/tumor suppressor gene expression abnormalities: node negative - 59% none positive, 29% one positive, 12% two or more positive, vs. node positive - 37% none positive, 23% one positive, 39% two or more positive (p = 0.01). Only 2/12 (17%) of tumors with distant metastases at presentation were negative for abnormal expression of any of these gene products, and 7/12 (58%) were positve for two or three. Among axillary node negative patients who developed recurrences, 67% exhibited staining for at least one gene product, compared to only 27% of those without recurrences (p = 0.02). All 5 cases with abnormal staining for each gene product had regional or distant metastases at presentation and recurred. In multivariate analysis, individual expression of p53 outweighed expression of ERBB-2 and EGFR in correlation with outcome. These data suggest clinical neoplastic progression of breast carcinomas correlates with cumulative genetic events detectable by protein expression. Short term recurrence, however, may correlate more closely with abnormal expression of p53 than with EGFR or ERBB-2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Land H, Parada LF, Weinberg RA: Cellular oncogenes and multistep carcinogenesis. Science 222: 771–778, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Kern SE, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Nakamura Y, White R: Allelotype of colorectal carcinomas. Science 24: 207–211, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hainsworth PJ, Henderson MA, Stillwell RG, Bennett RC: Comparison of EGFR, c-erbB-2 product and ras p21 immunohistochemistry as prognostic markers in primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 17: 9–15, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guerin M, Gabillot M, Mathieu M-C, Travagli J-P, Spielmann M, Andrieu N, Riou G: Structure and expression of c-erbB-2 and EGFR receptor genes in inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer: Prognostic significance. Int J Cancer 43: 201–208, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCann AH, Dervan PA, O'Regan M, Codd MB, Gullick WJ, Tobin BMJ, Carey DN: Prognostic significance of c-erbB-2 and estrogen receptor status in human breast cancer. Cancer Research 51: 3296–3303, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sainsbury JRC, Farndon JR, Needham GK, Malcolm AJ, Harris AL: Epidermal growth factor receptor status as predictor of early recurrence of and death from breast cancer. Lancet ii: 1398–1405, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guerin M, Barrois M, Terrier MJ, Spielmann M, Riou G: Overexpression of either c-myc or c-erbB-2/neu proto-oncogenes in human breast carcinomas: Correlation with poor prognosis. Oncogene Research 3: 21–31, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Hirota T, Tsugane S, Yamamoto Het al.: Correlation between long-term survival in breast cancer patients and amplification of two putative oncogene-coamplification units: hst-1/int-2 and c-erbB-2/ear-1. Cancer Research 49: 3104–3108, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bevilacqua G, Sobel ME, Liotta LA, Steeg PS: Association of low nm23 RNA levels in human primary infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas with lymph node involvement and other histopathological indicators of high metastatic potential. Cancer Research 49: 5185–5190, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devilee P, Van Den Broek M, Kuipers-Dijkshoorn N, Kolluri R, Khan PM, Pearson PL, Cornelisse CJ: At least four different chromosomal regions are involved in loss of heterozygosity in human breast carcinoma. Genomics 5: 554–560, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thor AD, Moore DH, Edgerton SM, Kawasaki ES, Reihsaus E, Lynch HT, Marcus JNet al.: Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene protein: An independent markers of prognosis in breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 845–855, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Visscher DW, Sarkar FH, Crissman JD: Clinical significance of pathologic, cytometric, and molecular parameters in carcinoma of the breast. In: Weinstein RS (ed) Advances in Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Mosby Year Book, Volume 5: 123–161, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarkar FH, Li Y-W, Crissman JD: A rapid and simple method for PCR-sequencing of p53 gene from a single 10 µm frozen or paraffin-embedded tissue section. BioTechniques (in press)

  14. Bishop YMM, Fienburg E, Holland PW: Dissociate Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert Met al.: Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Eng J Med 319: 525–532, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cline MJ, Battifora H, Yokata J: Proto-oncogene abnormalities in human breast cancer: Correlations with anatomic features and clinical course of disease. J Clin Oncol 5: 999–1006, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  17. Donovan-Peluso M, Contento AM, Tobon H, Ripepi B, Locker J: Oncogene amplification in breast cancer. Am J Path 138: 835–845, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berger MS, Lochner GW, Sauer S, Gullick WJ, Waterfield MD, Groner B, Hynes NE: Correlation of c-erbB-2 gene amplification and protein expression in human breast carcinoma with nodal status and nuclear grading. Cancer Research 48: 1238–1243, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dati C, Murace R, Tazartes O, Antoniotti S, Peroteau Iet al.: C-erbB-2 and ras expression levels in breast cancer are correlated and show a co-operative association with unfavorable clinical outcome. Int J Cancer 47: 833–838, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter T: Cooperation between oncogenes. Cell 64: 249–270, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wada T, Qian X, Greene MI: Intermolecular association of the p185neu protein and EGF receptor modulates EGF receptor function. Cell 61: 1339–1347, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kokai Y, Myers JN, Wada T, Brown VI, LeVea CM, Davis JG, Dobashi K, Greene MI: Synergistic interaction of p185c-neu and the EGF receptor leads to transformation of rodent fibroblasts. Cell 58: 287–292, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacKay J, Steel CM, Elder PA, Forrest APM, Evans HJ: Allele loss on short arm of chromosome 17 in breast cancers. Lancet ii: 1384–1385, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  24. Borresen AL, Ottestad L, Gaustad A, Andersen TI, Heikkila R, Jahnsen Tet al.: Amplification and protein over-expression of the neu/HER-2/c-erbB-2 protooncogene in human breast carcinomas: relationship to loss of gene sequences on chromosome 17, family history and prognosis. Br J Cancer 62: 585–590, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolman SR, Dawson SW: Genetic events in breast cancer and their clinical correlates. Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis 2: 277–291, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou D-J, Ahuja H, Cline MJ: Proto-oncogene abnormalities in human breast cancer: c-ERBB-2 amplification does not correlate with recurrence of disease. Oncogene 4: 105–108, 1989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visscher, D.W., Castellani, R., Wykes, S.M. et al. Concurrent abnormal expression of ERBB-2, EGFR, and p53 genes and clinical disease progression of breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Tr 28, 261–266 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666587

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666587

Key words

Navigation