Skip to main content
Log in

The active guanidinium group of saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin identified by the effects of pH on their activities on squid axon

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative potencies of saxitoxin at pH 7.25 and 8.25 have been determined on the squid giant axon under voltage-clamp conditions or by\(\dot V_{{\text{max}}} \) of the propagated action potential. Of the two guanidinium groups in saxitoxin, the 7, 8, 9 group has been identified as the biologically active group. The evidence lies in the demonstration of a quantitative agreement between the relative abundance of the protonated, positively charged form of that group at pH's 7.25 and 8.25 (ratio 1.80) with the relative potencies (ratio 1.79) of the toxin. The 1, 2, 3 group is excluded by the lack of agreement between the relative abundance of the protonated form (ratio 1.00) and the relative potencies at these pH's.

The 1, 2, 3 group is further excluded by the observation that neosaxitoxin is equally potent at pH 6.50 and 7.25, in spite of a difference of 6-fold in the abundance of a deprotonated hydroxyl group on N-1 which should have influenced the potency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bordner J, Thiessen WE, Bates HA, Rapoport H (1975) The structure of a crystalline derivative of saxitoxin: the structure of saxitoxin. Am J Chem Soc 97: 6008–6012

    Google Scholar 

  • Camougis G, Takman BH, Tasse JRP (1967) Potency difference between the zwitterion form and the cation forms of tetrodotoxin. Science 156: 1625–1627

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo LA, Adelman WJ (1970) Equilibrium and kinetic properties of the interaction between tetrodotoxin and the excitable membrane of the squid axon. J Gen Physiol 55: 309–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Deguchi T (1976) Structure and activity in tetrodotoxin derivatives. Jap J Pharmacol 17: 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazarossian VE, Schantz EJ, Schnoes HK, Strong FM (1976) A biologically active acid hydrolysis product of saxitoxin. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 68: 776–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Good NE, Winget GD, Winter W, Connolly TN, Izawa S, Singh RMM (1966) Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research. Biochem 5: 467–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto T, Kishi Y, Takahashi S, Hirata Y (1965) Tetrodotoxin. Tetrahedron 21: 2059–2088

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille B (1968) Pharmacological modifications of the sodium channels of frog nerve. J Gen Physiol 51: 199–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille B (1975) The receptor for tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin: a structural hypothesis. Biophys J 15: 615–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondeghem LM (1978) Validity of\(\dot V_{{\text{max}}} \) as a measure of the sodium current in cardiac and nervous tissues. Biophys. J 23: 147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao CY (1983) New perspectives on the interactions between tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin with the excitable membrane. Toxicon Supplement 3: 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao CY, Nishiyama A (1965) Actions of saxitoxin on peripheral neuromuscular systems. J Physiol (London) 272: 50–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao CY, Walker SE (1982) Active groups of saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin as deduced from actions of saxitoxin analogues on frog muscle and squid axon. J Physiol (London) 323: 619–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao PN, James-Kracke MR, Kao CY, Wichtman CF, Schnoes HK (1981) Identification of the active guanidinium group in saxitoxin. Biol Bull 161: 347

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn FE, Ghazarossian VE, Schantz EJ, Schnoes HK, Strong FM (1981) Derivatives of saxitoxin. Bioorganic Chem 10: 412–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher HS, Fuhrman FA, Buchwald HD, Fischer HG (1964) Tarichatoxin-tetrodotoxin, a potent neurotoxin. Science 144: 1100–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Narahashi T, Haas HG, Therrien EF (1967) Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin: comparison of nerve blocking mechanism. Science 157: 1441–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Narahashi T, Moore JW, Frazier DT (1969) Dependence of tetrodotoxin blockage of nerve membrane conductance on external pH. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 169: 224–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JM, Rogart RB (1977) The binding of saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin to excitable tissues. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 79: 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RS, Rapoport H (1980) The pKa's of saxitoxin. J Am Chem Soc 102: 7335–7339

    Google Scholar 

  • Schantz EJ, Ghazarossian VE, Schnoes HK, Strong FM, Springer JP, Pezzanite JO, Clardy J (1975) The structure of saxitoxin. J Am Chem Soc 97: 1238–1239

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz JR, Ulbricht W, Wagner HH (1973) The rate of action of tetrodotoxin on myelinated nerve fibres ofXenopus laevis andRana esculenta. J Physiol (London) 233: 167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu Y, Alam M, Oshima Y, Fallon WE (1975) Presence of four toxins in red-tide infested clams and culturedGonyaulux tamarensis cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 66: 731–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu Y, Hsu C, Genenah A (1981) Structure of saxitoxin in solution and stereochemistry of dihydrosaxitoxins. J Am Chem Soc 103: 605–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu Y, Hsu C, Fallon WE, Oshima Y, Miura I, Nakanishi K (1978) Structure of neosaxitoxin. J Am Chem Soc 100: 6791–6793

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman IM, Gilbert DL, Lipicky RJ (1971) Effect of external pH upon the voltage-dependent currents of the squid giant axon. Biophys J 11: 55a

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda K, Ikuma S, Kawamura M, Tachikawa R, Sakai K, Tamura C, Amakasu O (1964) Tetrodotoxin VII. On the structure of tetrodotoxin and its derivatives. Chem Pharm Bull 12: 1357–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbricht W (1981) Kinetics of drug action and equilibrium results at the node of Ranvier. Physiol Rev 61: 785–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbricht W, Wagner HH (1975) The influence of pH on equilibrium effects of tetrodotoxin on myelinated nerve fibers ofRana esculenta. J Physiol (London) 252: 159–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HH, Ulbricht W (1975) The rates of saxitoxin action and of saxitoxin-tetrodotoxin interaction at the node of Ranvier. Pflügers Arch 359: 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichtman CF, Boyer GL, Divan CL, Schantz EJ, Schnoes HK (1981) Neurotoxins ofGonyaulux excavata and Bay of Fundy scallops. Tetrahedron Letters 22: 1941–1944

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CH, Narahashi T (1973) Mechanism of action of propranolol on squid axon membrane. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 184: 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CH, Narahashi T, Shimizu Y (1980) Actions of saxitoxin analogs on squid axon membrane. Abstracts Neurosci Soc 6: 174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kao, P.N., James-Kracke, M.R. & Kao, C.Y. The active guanidinium group of saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin identified by the effects of pH on their activities on squid axon. Pflugers Arch. 398, 199–203 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00657151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00657151

Key words

Navigation