Summary
An approximate method with explicit solutions to apply independent culling levels for multiple traits in n-stages of selection was developed. An approximate solution was found for sequentially selected traits. Two assumptions were necessary. The first was to assume that subsequent selection would not appreciably change the mean of traits already selected, and the second was to approximate the variance of a correlated trait in a selected population with an upward biased projection. The procedure was shown to give near optimal results regardless of selection intensity or genetic correlations if phenotypic correlations among traits were low. The procedure gave poor results only for certain sequences of selection when phenotypic correlations were high. However, in those cases good results were obtained using a different sequence of selection. With high correlations, the procedure is recommended only after comparing solutions and expected genetic gain for all sequences of selection. If the expected aggregate gain for the sequence of selection desired is less than that of another order, culling points associated with the optimal ordering must be determined. Genetic gain from use of culling points is independent of order of selection. The procedure is recommended for use with computer programs that attempt to find optimal culling points to reduce computational time and to check results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown GH (1967) The use of correlated variables for preliminary culling. Biometrics 23:551–562
Cochran WG (1951) Improvement by means of selection. In: Neyman J (ed) Proc 2nd Berkeley Symp on Math, Stat and Probability. Berkeley, Calif., pp 449–470
Cotterill PP, James JW (1981) Optimizing two-stage independent culling selection in tree and animal breeding. Theor Appl Genet 59:67–72
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, London
Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Hered 33:393–399
Martin RS, Peters G, Wilkinson JH (1965) Symmetric decomposition of a positive definite matrix. Num Math 7:362–383
Namkoong G (1970) Optimum allocation of selection intensity in two stages of truncation selection. Biometrics 26:465–476
SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS user's guide: basics, version 5 edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.
Saxton AM (1989) INDCULL version 3.0: Independent culling for two or more traits. J Hered 80:166–167
Smith SP, Quaas RL (1982) Optimal truncation points for independent culling-level selection involving two traits. Biometrics 38:975–980
Turner HN, Young SSY (1969) Quantitative genetics in sheep breeding. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Williams JM, Weiler H (1964) Further charts for the means of truncated normal bivariate distributions. Aust J Stat 6(3), 117–129.
Young SSY (1961) A further examination of the relative efficiency of three methods of selection for genetic gains under less restricted conditions. Genet Res 2:106–121
Young SSY, Weiler H (1961) Selection for two correlated traits by independent culling levels. J Genet 57:329–338
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by D. Van Vleck
Journal Paper No. 12448 of the Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muir, W.M., Xu, S. An approximate method for optimum independent culling level selection for n stages of selection with explicit solutions. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 82, 457–465 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588599
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588599