Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prophylaxis with oral cefadroxil versus intravenous cefuroxime in trochanteric fracture surgery

A clinical multicentre study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was performed in 559 patients to compare two doses of oral cefadroxil with three doses of intravenous cefuorxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in intra- and subtrochanteric hip fracture surgery. Antibiotic concentrations in the wound fluid were determined at the start and at the end of the operation. The first dose of cefadroxil was given about 2 h before surgery and cefuroxime about 30 min before operation. In 226/242 (93%) patients randomized to oral cefadroxil, the concentration in the wound during surgery was on average 15 /gmg/ml, i.e., well above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC-90) for Staphylococcus aureus. In the cefuroxime group, antibiotic levels in the wound exceeded the MIC-90 for S. aureus in 204/210 (97%) of the patients at the start and/or at the end of surgery. All patients were followed up for 4 months. One deep and five superficial infections occurred in the cefuroxime group and no deep but one superficial infection in the cefadroxil group (P = 0.07). S. aureus was cultured in three of the infected cases while cultures were negative in four patients. Four of the seven infected patients had adequate levels of antibiotic in the wound during surgery, and in three patients no antibiotic assay was performed. The infected patients did not differ in age, sex, operation time, bleeding or any other basic variable compared with patients who healed without complications. Two doses of cefadroxil seems to be practical and as effective as intravenously administered cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in trochanteric hip fracture surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barza M, Weinstein L (1974) Penetration of antibiotics into fibrin loci in vivo. Comparison of penetration of ampicillin into fibrin clots, abscesses and “interstitial” fluids. J Infect Dis 59:129

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergan T (1987) Pharmacokinetic properties of cephalosporins. Drugs 34 [Suppl 2]:89–104

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodoky A, Neff U, Heberer M, Harder F (1993) Antibiotic prophylaxis with two doses of cephalosporin in patients managed with internal fixation for a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowers WH, Wilson FC, Green WB (1973) Antibiotic prophylaxis in experimental bone infections. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55:795–807

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnett JW, Gustillo RB, Williams DN, Kind AC (1980) Prophylactic antibiotics in hip fractures. A double blind prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:457–462

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cars O (1980) Antibiotic assay in muscles: are conventional tissue levels misleading as indicator of antibacterial activity? Scand J Infect Dis 12:307–309

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia S, Lozano ML, Gatell JM, Soriano E. Ramon R, Sanmiguel JG (1991) Prophylaxis against infection. Single-dose cefonicid compared with multiple-dose cefamandole. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]: 73:1044–1048

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton-Miller JM (1987) Microbial investigations of cephalosporins. Drugs 34 [Suppl 2]:23–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hedin G, Hambraeus A (1993) Daily scrub with chlorhexidine reduces skin colonization by antibiotic-resistant Staphylococci epidermidis. J Hosp Infect 24:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedström S-TA, Lidgren L, Sernbo I, Törholm C, Onnerfdlt R (1987) Cefuroxime prophylaxis in trochanteric hip fracture operations. Acta Orthop Scand 58:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hjortrup A, Sørensen C, Mejdahl S, Horsnces M, Kjersgaard P (1990) Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for hip fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 61:152–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jalling M, Malmborg AS, Boreus LO (1972) Evaluation of a micromethod for determination of antibiotic concentrations in plasma. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 4:150

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones S, DiPiro JT, Nix DE, Bhatti NA (1985) Cephalosporins for prophylaxis in operative repair of femoral fractures: levels in serum, muscle, and haemtoma. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:921–924

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kleeman KT, Tammy B, Wesley EK (1993) Species distribution of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates at a community hospital and implication for selection of staphylococcal identification procedures. J Clin Microbial 31:1318–1321

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knapp CC, Washington JA (1988) In vitro activities of LY 163892, cefaclor and Cefuroxime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:131–133

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindberg L (1984) Antibiotic prophylaxis in postoperative infections in orthopaedic surgery. In: Antibiotics and surgery workshop. National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden, pp 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lorian V (1975) Some effects of subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin on the structure and division of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 7:864–870

    Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald PJ, Wetherall BL, Pruul H (1981) Postantibiotic leukocyte enhancement: increased susceptibility of bacteria pretreated with antibiotics to activity of leukocytes. Rev Infect Dis 3:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neu HC (1984) Cephalosporin antibiotics as applied in surgery of bones and joints. Clin Orthop 190:50–64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nungu KS, Bengtsson S, Olerud C, Rehnberg L, Larsson S (1992) Oral cephadroxil prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 63:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quintiliani R (1982) A review of the penetration of cefadroxil into human tissue. J Antimicrob Chemother 10[Suppl B]:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quintiliani R, Nightingale C (1984) Principals of antibiotic usage. Clin Orthop 190:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan DM (1979) Implanted cotton threads: a novel method for measuring concentrations of antibiotics in tissue fluids. J Antimicrob Chemother 5:735

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schurman DJ, Hirshman HP, Burton HP (1980) Cefalotin and cefamandole penetration into bone synovial fluid, and wound drainage fluid. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:981–985

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shah PM, Heetderks G, Stille W (1976) Activity of amikacin at subinhibitory levels. J Antimicrob Chemother 2:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sheppard M, King A, Phillips I (1991) In vitro activity of cefpodoxime, a new oral cephalosporin, compared with that of nine other antimicrobial agents. Eur J Clin Micro Infect Dis 10:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tengve B, Kjellander J (1978) Antibiotic prophylaxis in operations on trochanteric femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:97–99

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nungu, K.S., Olerud, C., Rehnberg, L. et al. Prophylaxis with oral cefadroxil versus intravenous cefuroxime in trochanteric fracture surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114, 303–307 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00448952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00448952

Keywords

Navigation