Skip to main content
Log in

Scanning electron microscopic comparison between the thrombogenic properties of heparinized and non-heparinized vena Cava catheters

A long-term study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an experimental comparative study on rabbits, the efficacy of the reduction of surface thrombus formation was investigated using heparinized central venous catheters compared with non-heparinized. Up to a central indwelling period of ten days, there was a reduction of the thrombus layer thickness on the heparinized catheters of 80% (with a trial duration of three days this was as much as 90%).

The action of the stabilized surface heparin, which leads to a substantial thromboresistance, is complex in nature. 1) By intensified adsorption of plasma proteins in the early phase (proteins consist of antithrombin III, factor IX, X and XI), there is very much less thrombocyte adhesion and aggregation on the heparinized catheter surfaces. 2) The externally orientated negative net charge of the heparin shows a similar effect. 3) If there is thrombocyte adhesion despite this, further heparin effects become more prominent. Thus the release of ThF 3 and ADP, which leads to aggregation, is markedly inhibited. On the one hand, this leads to easier dissolution of already aggregated thrombocytes and on the other to a reduction of the catalytic thrombocyte surface for the plasma clotting factors. 4) This effect is supported by the increased adsorption of antithrombin III onto the control surface. 5) Finally there is also an inhibitory effect of heparin on the activated Stuart-Prower factor.

Local thrombosis on the venous catheter surface can thus be effectively reduced by local therapy, without greater risks for the intensive care patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burri C, Gasser D (1971) Der Vena-Cava-Ketheter. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burri C (1975) Der Katherismus der Vena Cava. Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 8:23–60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danishefsky I, Tzeng F (1974) Preparation of heparinlinked agarose and its interaction with plasma. Thromb Res 4:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsch E (1977) Haemorrhagische Diathesen. In: Gross R, Schölmerich P (eds) Lehrbuch der Inneren Medizin. Schattauer, Stuttgart pp 179–206

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eldh P, Jacobsson B (1974) Heparinized vascular catheters: A clinical trial. Radiology 11:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gofferje H (1977) Infusionstherapie heute. 14. Infusionstechnik. Med Welt 28:1152–1156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haag R, Tiller FW, Opelt KH, Weidener D (1977) Bedeutung der bakteriellen Kontamination zentraler Venenkatheter für die Entstehung lokaler und allgemeiner infektiöser Komplikationen. Das Deutsche Gesundheitswesen 32:699–703

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobsson B, Schlossman D (1973) Thrombogenicity of heparinized vascular catheters. Acta Radiol [Ther] (Stockh) 14:569–576

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurock W, Schier J (1974) Erfahrungen mit dem Vena-Cava-Katheter. Med Welt 25:135–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lagergren H, Olsson P, Swedenborg J (1974) Inhibited platelet adhesion: A non-thrombogenic characteristic of a heparin coated surface. Surgery 75:643–650

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larsson RL, Hjelte WB, Eriksson JC, Lagergren HR, Olsson P (1976) The stability of glutardial-dehyde-stabilized 35S-heparinized surfaces in contact with blood. Thromb Haemostas 37:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larsson R, Rosengren A, Olsson P (1977) Determination of platelet adhesion to polyethylene and heparinized surfaces with the aid of bioliuminescence and 51Chromium labelled platelets. Thromb Res 11:517–530

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawin P (1975) Kava-Ketheter and Venae sectio. In: Praxis der Intensivbehandlung. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mlynek HJ, Klötzer B (1969) Erfahrungen mit Kava-Kathetern. Zentralbl Chir 94:486–491

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson P, Lagergren H, Larsson R, Radegran K (1977) Prevention of platelet adhesion and aggregation by a glutaraldehyde-stabilized heparin surface. Thromb Haemostas 37:274–282

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pilgerstorfer HW, Finkenstedt G, Kleinberger G, Kotzaurek R, Pall H, Pichier M, Raberger G, Szelless S (1973) Subclavia-Katheter im Rahmen der internistischen Intensivmedizin. Wien Klin Wochenschr 50:822–825

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sawyer PN, Pate JW (1953) Bioelectric phenomena as an etiologic factor in intravascular thrombosis. Am J Physiol 75:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schocke J (1973) Der Subclavia Katheter in der chirurgischen Intensivtherapie. Zentralbl Chir 98:270–273

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scholz G, Loewe KR (1969) Die Punktion der Vena subclavia und ihre Komplikationen aus pathologisch-anatomischer Sicht. Med Welt 20:2248–2251

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walker FJ, Esmon CT (1979) The molecular mechanisms of heparin action: II. Separation of functionally different heparins by affinity chromatography. Thromb Res 14:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh PN, Biggs R (1972) The role of platelets in intrinsic factor Xa formation. Br J Haematol 22:743–760

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenning, M., Höpker, WW. Scanning electron microscopic comparison between the thrombogenic properties of heparinized and non-heparinized vena Cava catheters. Virchows Arch. A Path. Anat. and Histol. 391, 207–215 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437597

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437597

Key words

Navigation