Summary
The maize mutable allele bz-m2 (Ac), which arose from insertion of the 4.6 kb Ac element in the bz (bronze) locus, gives rise to stable bz (bz-s) derivatives that retain an active Ac element closely linked to bz. In the derivative bz-s:2114 (Ac), the Ac element is recombinationally inseparable from bz and transposes to unlinked sites at a frequency similar to that in the progenitor allele bzm2 (Ac). Both alleles have been cloned and sequenced. The bz-s:2114 (Ac) mutation retains Ac at the original site of insertion, but has lost a 789 pb upstream bz sequence adjacent to the insertion, hence the stable phenotype. The 8 bp target site direct repeat flanking the Ac insertion in the bz-m2 (Ac) allele is deleted in bz-s: 2114 (Ac), yet the Ac element is not impaired in its ability to transpose. The only functional Ac element in bz-s:2114 (Ac) is the one at the bz locus: in second-cycle derivatives without Ac activity, the loss of Ac activity correlated with the physical loss of the Ac element from the bz locus. The deletion endpoint in bz-s: 2114 (Ac) corresponds exactly with the site of insertion of a Ds element in a different bz mutation, which suggests that there may be preferred integration sites in the genome and that the deletion originated as the consequence of an abortive transposition event. Finally, we report two errors in the published Ac sequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed A, Scraba D (1978) Nature of deletions formed in response to IS2 in a revertant of the gal3 insertion of e. coli. Mol Gen Genet 163:189–196
Calos M, Miller J (1980a) Transposable elements. Cell 20:579–585
Calos M, Miller J (1980b) Molecular consequences of deletion formation mediated by the transposon Tn9. Nature 285:38–41
Dean C, Tamaki S, Dunsmuir P, Favreau M, Katayama K, Dooner H, Bedbrook J (1986) MRNA transcripts of several plant genes are polyadenylated at multiple sites in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 14:2229–2240
Doering H-P, Garber R, Nelsen B, Tillmann E (1985) Transposable element Ds and chromosomal rearrangements. In: Freeling M (ed) Plant Genetics. Liss, New York, pp 355–367
Dooner HK (1985) A deletion adjacent to the Ac insertion site in a stable derivative from bz-m2(Ac). In: Freeling M (ed) Plant Genetics. Liss, New York, pp 561–573
Dooner HK (1986) Genetic fine structure of the bronze locus in maize. Genetics 113:1021–1036
Dooner HK, Weck E, Adams S, Ralston E, Favreau M, English J (1985) A molecular genetic analysis of insertions in the bronze locus in maize. Mol Gen Genet 200:240–246
Dooner HK, English J, Ralston EJ, Weck E (1986) A single genetic unit specifies two transposition functions in the maize element Activator. Science 234:210–211
English J, Ralston E, Dooner HK (1987) Corrections in the nucleotide sequence of Activator (Ac). Maize Genetics Coop Newslett 61:81
Fedoroff N, Wessler S, Shure M (1983) Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell 35:235–242
Fedoroff N, Furtek D, Nelson OE (1984) Cloning of the bronze locus in maize by a simple and generalizable procedure using the transposable element Activator (Ac). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3825–3829
Green MM (1967) The genetics of a mutable gene at the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 56:467–482
Jones J, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J (1985) High level expression of introduced chimaeric genes in regenerated transformed plants. EMBO J 4:2411–2418
Kunze R, Stochaj U, Laufs J, Starlinger P (1987) Transcription of transposable element Activator (Ac) of Zea mays L. EMBO J 6:1555–1563
McClintock B (1946) Maize genetics. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 45:176–186
McClintock B (1947) Cytogenetic studies of maize and Neurospora. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 46:146–152
McClintock B (1951) Chromosome organization and gene expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 16:13–47
McClintock B (1955) Controlled mutation in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 54:245–255
McClintock B (1956a) Mutation in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 55:323–332
McClintock B (1956b) Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 21:197–216
McClintock B (1962) Topographical relations between elements of control systems in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 61:448–461
McClintock B (1963) Further studies of gene control systems in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 62:486–493
Messing J, Crea R, Seeburg P (1981) A system for shotgun DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 9:309–321
Mueller-Neumann M, Yoder J, Starlinger P (1984) The DNA sequence of the transposable element Ac of Zea mays L. Mol Gen Genet 198:19–24
Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E (1978) Nucleotide sequence of an insertion element, ISI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:615–619
Pohlman R, Fedoroff N, Messing J (1984) The nucleotide sequence of the maize controlling element Activator. Cell 37:635–643
Ralston E, English J, Dooner HK (1987) Stability of deletion, insertion and point mutations at the bronze locus in maize. Theor Appl Genet 74:471–475
Reif HJ, Saedler H (1973) ISI is involved in deletion formation in the gal region of E. coli K12. Mol Gen Genet 137:17–28
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467
Schiefelbein J, Furtek D, Raboy V, Banks J, Fedoroff N, Nelson OE (1985) Exploiting transposable elements to study the expression of a maize gene. In: Freeling M (ed) Plant Genetics. Liss, New York, pp 445–459
Shapiro J (1979) Molecular model for the transposition and replication of bacteriphage Mu and other transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1933–1937
Sutton WD, Gerlach WL, Schwartz D, Peacock WL (1984) Molecular analysis of Ds controlling element mutations at the Adlh locus of maize. Science 223:1265–1268
Taylor L, Walbot V (1985) A deletion adjacent to the maize transposable element Mul accompanies loss of Adhl expression. EMBO J 4:869–876
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by R.B. Goldberg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dooner, H.K., English, J. & Ralston, E.J. The frequency of transposition of the maize element Activator is not affected by an adjacent deletion. Molec. Gen. Genet. 211, 485–491 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425705
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00425705