Skip to main content
Log in

Delayed-type skin reaction to 2,4-dinitrophenylated epidermal cells in guinea pigs with contact sensitivity to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Contact sensitivity (CS) induced by hapten has been thought to be analogous to delayed-type hypersensitivity, such as the Mantoux reaction, because of outstanding similarities between the two phenomena. It can be suggested that animals with CS respond also to intradermal injection of the conjugate of hapten and protein as well as to epicutaneous application of hapten. However, evidence against this has been reported. In the present experiments, delayed-type skin reaction (DSR) was successfully obtained in JY1 strain guinea pigs sensitized by painting the skin with 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene using in vitro dinitrophenylated epidermal cell suspension (DNP-EC) as antigen for a delayed intradermal test. The experiment using anti-Ia alloantiserum and complement showed that the elicitation of DSR is due to the presence of Ia-positive cells (presumably Langerhans cells) among DNP-ECs. The delayed intradermal test with the conjugates such as haptenated ECs in the animals with CS is considered to be an experimentally useful way of analysing the antigen in the sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benacerraf B, Gell PGH (1959) Studies on hypersensitivity. III. The relation between delayed reactivity to the picryl group of conjugates and contact sensitivity. Immunology 2:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiba J, Otokawa M, Nakagawa M, Egashira Y (1978) Serological studies on the major histocompatibility complex of new inbred strains of the guinea pig. Microbiol Immunol 22:545–555

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chyung EJ, Choi SR, Kim CW, Houh W (1984) Effects of UVB on the induction and elicitation of DNCB contact sensitivity in guinea pigs. Korean J Dermatol 22:502–507

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisen HN, Kern M, Newton WT, Helmreich E (1959) A study of the distribution of 2,4-dinitrobenzene sensitizers between isolated lymph node cells and extracellular medium in relation to induction of contact skin sensitivity. J Exp Med 110:187–206

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gell PGH, Benacerraf B (1961) Studies on hypersensitivity. IV. The relationship between contact and delayed sensitivity: A study on the specificity of cellular immune reactions. J Exp Med 113:571–585

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horio T, Okamoto (1982) The mechanisms of inhibitory effect of 8-methoxypsoralen and long-wave ultraviolet light on experimental contact sensitization. J Invest Dermatol 78:402–405

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morison WL, Parrish JA, Woehler ME, Bloch KJ (1981) The influence of ultraviolet radiation on allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea-pig. I. UVB radiation. Br J Dermatol 104:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakagawa S, Tanioku K (1972) The induction of delayed sensitivity to 2,4-dinitrophenyl conjugates in guinea pigs sensitized with DNCB. Dermatologica 144:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nishioka K, Funai T, Yokozeki H, Katayama I (1984) Induction of hapten-specific lymphoid cell proliferation by liposome-carrying molecules from haptenated epidermal cells in contact sensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 83:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oka D, Nakagawa S, Ueki H (1985) The suppressive effect of tape-stripping treatment of guinea-pig skin on the induction of contact sensitivity by intradermal injection of haptenated epidermal cells. Arch Dermatol Res 278:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ptack W, Rozycka D, Askenase PW, Gershon RK (1980) Role of antigen-presenting cells in the development and persistence of contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 151:362–375

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salvin SB, Smith RF (1961) The specificity of allergic reactions. III. Contact hypersensitibity. J Exp Med 114:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sauder DN, Tamaki K, Moshell AN, Fyjiwara H, Katz SI (1981) Induction of tolerance to topically applied TNCB using TNP-conjugated ultraviolet light-irradiated epidermal cells. J Immunol 127:261–265

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shelley WB, Juhlin L (1977) Selective uptake of contact allergens by the Langerhans cell. Arch Dermatol 113:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stingl G, Katz SI, Shevach EM, Wolff-Schreiner EC, Green I (1978) Detection of Ia antigens on Langerhans cells in guinea pig skin. J Immunol 120:570–578

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tamaki K, Fujiwara H, Katz SI (1981) The role of epidermal cells in the induction and suppression of contact sensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 76:275–278

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas DW, Clement L, Shevach EM (1978) T-lymphocyte stimulation by hapten-conjugated macrophages. A model system for the study of immunocompetent cell interaction. Immunol Rev 40:181–204

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toews GB, Bergstresser PR, Streilein JW (1980) Epidermal Langerhans cell density determines whether contact hypersensitivity or unresponsiveness follows skin painting with DNFB. J Immunol 124:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walden P, Nagy ZA, Klein J (1985) Induction of regulatory T-lymphocyte responses by liposomes carrying major histocompatibility complex molecules and foreign antigen. Nature 315:327–329

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakagawa, S., Takei, Y., Bang, D. et al. Delayed-type skin reaction to 2,4-dinitrophenylated epidermal cells in guinea pigs with contact sensitivity to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. Arch Dermatol Res 279, 236–240 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417321

Key words

Navigation