Summary
The growing body of evidence showing that malignant tumors are heterogeneous and contain diverse subpopulations of tumor cells is reviewed, with particular emphasis being given to the presence of tumor-cell subpopulations with differing metastatic properties. The factors that may influence the evolution of cellular diversity at different stages in the progression of malignant neoplasms are discussed. Emphasis is given to the possibility that interactions occurring amongst the constituent subpopulations of a malignant tumor may influence the rate at which new variant subpopulations emerge. Metastatic heterogeneity poses significant problems for experimental efforts to identify features unique to metastatic cells and also for the therapy of metastatic disease.
References
Cifone M, Fidler IJ (1981) Increasing metastatic potential is associated with increasing genetic instability of clones isolated from murine neoplasms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:6949–6952
Fidler IJ (1973) Selection of successive tumor lines for metastasis Nature New Biol 242:148–149
Fidler IJ, Kripke ML (1977) Metastasis results from pre-existing variant cells within a malignant tumor. Science 197:893–895
Fidler IJ, Poste G (1982) The heterogeneity of metastatic properties in malignant tumor cells and regulation of the metastatic phenotype. In: Owens A (ed) Tumor cell heterogeneity. Academic Press, New York (in press)
Fidler IJ, White RJ (1982) Design of models for testing cancer therapeutic agents. Van Nostrand, New York
Fidler IJ, Gruys E, Cifone MA, Barnes Z, Bucana C (1981) Demonstration of multiple phenotypic diversity in a murine melanoma of recent origin. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:947–956
Foulds L (1956) The histologic analysis of mammary tumors of mice. II. The histology of responsiveness and progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 17:713–756
Frei E, III (1982) Models and the clinical dilemma. In: Fidler IJ, White R (eds) Design of models for testing cancer therapeutic agents. Van Nostrand, New York, pp 248–259
Goldin A (1980) Combined chemotherapy. Oncology (Suppl 1) 37:3–8
Hanna N (1980) Expression of metastatic potential of tumor cells in young nude mice is correlated with low levels of natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Int J Cancer 26:675–680
Hanna N (1982) Role of natural killer cells in control of cancer metastasis. In: Fidler IJ (ed) Cancer metastasis reviews. Nijhoff, Amsterdam (in press)
Hart IR, Fidler IK (1981) The implications of tumor heterogeneity for studies on the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta 651:37–50
Heppner GH (1979) The challenge of tumor heterogeneity. In: Bulbrook RD, Taylor DJ (eds) Commentaries on research in breast cancer. AR Liss, New York, pp 177–191
Koch FE (1939) Zur Frage der Metastasenbildung bei Impftumoren. Z Krebsforsch 48:495–505
Mantovani A, Giavazzi R, Alessandri G, Spreafico F, Garattini S (1981) Characterization of tumor lines derived from spontaneous metastases of a transplanted murine sarcoma. Eur J Cancer 17:71–76
Miller BE, Miller FR, Leith J, Heppner GH (1980) Growth interaction in vivo between tumor subpopulations derived from a single mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res 40:3977–3981
Newcomb EW, Silverstein SC, Silagi S (1978) Malignant mouse melanoma cells do not form tumors when mixed with cells of a non-malignant subclone: relationships between plasminogen activator expression by the tumor cells and the host's immune response. J Cell Physiol 95:169–177
Nicolson GL (1982) Cancer metastasis: organ colonization and the cell surface properties of malignant cells. Biochim Biophys Acta (in press)
Nowell PC (1976) The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Acquired genetic lability permits stepwise selections of variant sublines and underlies tumor progression. Science 194:23–28
Poste G (1982a) Experimental systems for analysis of the malignant phenotype. In: Fidler IJ (ed) Cancer metastasis reviews. Nijhoff, Amsterdam (in press)
Poste G (1982b) Methods and models for studying tumor invasion. In: Hart IR, Liotta L (eds) Tumor invasion and metastasis. Nijhoff, Amsterdam, pp 148–177
Poste G, Fidler IJ (1980) The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Nature 283:139–146
Poste G, Doll J, Hart IR, Fidler IJ (1980) In vitro selection of murine B 16 melanoma variants with enhanced tissue invasive properties. Cancer Res 40:1636–1644
Poste G, Doll J, Fidler IJ (1981) Interactions between clonal subpopulations affect the stability of the metastatic phenotype in polyclonal populations of B 16 melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:6226–6230
Poste G, Doll J, Brown AE, Tzeng J, Zeidman I (1982a) A comparison of the metastatic properties of B 16 melanoma clones isolated from cultured cell lines, subcutaneous tumors and individual lung tumors. Cancer Res 42:2770–2778
Poste G, Tzeng J, Doll J, Greig R, Rieman D, Zeidman I (1982b) Evolution of tumor cell heterogeneity durig progressive growth of individual lung metastases. Proc Nath Acid Sci USA 79: 6974–6978
Salmon S (1980) Cloning of human tumor stem cells. AR Liss, New York
Sugarbaker EV (1977) Cancer metastasis: a product of tumor-host interactions. Curr Probl Cancer 3:3–59
Talmadge JE, Fidler IJ (1982) Enhanced metastatic potential of tumor cells harvested from spontaneous metastases of heterogeneous murine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 69:975–980
Weiss L (1980) Metastases: differences between cancer cells in primary and secondary tumors. In: Ioachim H (ed) Pathology annual, vol 10. Raven Press, New York, pp 51–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The “Jornal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology” publishes in loose succession “Editorials” and “Guest Editorials” on current and/or controversial problems in experimental and clinical oncology. These contributions represent exclusively the personal opinion of the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poste, G., Greig, R. The experimental and clinical implications of cellular heterogeneity in malignant tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 106, 159–170 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402602
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402602