Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of microbial floras on the distributions of five domestic Drosophila species across fruit resources

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The distributions of five Drosophila species and four components of the microflora have been compared across a total of 48 traps baited with four different fruit and vegetable substrates in two domestic compost heaps in Canberra (Australia). Large and consistent differences are found, both among the Drosophila and among the microbial classes, in their distributions across traps baited with different substrates. Moreover the distribution of each Drosophila species shows a unique set of strong associations with the microbial distributions. Thus the distributions of both D. simulans and D. melanogaster are found to be strongly negatively correlated with the abundance of bacteria while D. simulans is also strongly positively correlated with the titre of fermenter yeasts. D. immigrans is strongly positively correlated both with bacteria and with non-fermenter yeasts. D. hydei is positively correlated with nonfermentery yeasts and D. busckii is negatively correlated with fermenter yeasts. Moulds are the only microbial class not consistently associated with the distribution of any of the Drosophila species. The correlations with the other microbial classes are sufficient to explain the majority of the abundance differences of the Drosophila species among the trap types. It is therefore proposed that the clear partitioning of the fruit resources by the Drosophila is due to their differing primary interactions with the microflora.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson S (1970) Experimental microbial ecology. Academic Press. New York, 236 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson W, Shorrocks B (1977) Breeding site specificity in the domestic species of Drosophila. Oecologia 29:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) (1982) Ecological genetics and evolution: The cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, New York, 362 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M (1982) Yeasts and Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Carson HL, Thompson JN Jr (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 3 b. Academic Press, New York, pp 345–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Shorrocks B (1978) The feeding and breeding sites of Drosophila abscura Fallen and D. subobscura Collin. J Nat Hist 12:137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock IR (1976) Drosophilidae of Australia. I. Drosophila (Insecta: Diptera). Aut J Zool Suppl Ser No 40

  • Brock TD (1966) Principles of microbial ecology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 306 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson HL (1971) The ecology of Drosophila breeding sites. HL Lyon Arboretum Lecture No. 2. University of Hawaii

  • Colless DR, McAlpine DK (1970) Diptera. In: CSIRO (ed) The insects of Australia, Chapt 34. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 656–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggard GE (1981) Alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde oxidase and alcohol utilisation in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. immigrans and D. busckii. In: Gibson JB, Oakeshott JG (eds) Genetic studies of Drosophila populations. Australian National University, Canberra, pp 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky Th, Cooper DM, Phaff HJ, Knapp ED, Carson HL (1956) Studies on the ecology of Drosophila in the Yosemite region of California. IV. Differential attraction of species of Drosophila to different species of yeasts. Ecology 37:544–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Erk FC, Sang JH (1966) The comparative nutritional requirements of two sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 12:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman JC (1982) The role of volatiles in the ecology of Drosophila. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, New York, pp 191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman JC, Hackbarth KR, Heed WB (1981a) Behavioural differentiation between two species of cactophilic Drosophila. III. Oviposition site preference. Am Nat 118:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman JC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1981b) Larval selectivity for yeast species by Drosophila mojavensis in natural substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4435–4439

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman JC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1982) Comparisons of yeast florae from natural substrates and larval guts of southwestern Drosophila. Oecologia 52:187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JB, May TW, Wilks AV (1981) Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to environmental variation. I. Ethanol levels in breeding sites and allozyme frequencies. Oecologia 51:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes RS, Moxon LN, Parsons PA (1980) Genetic variability of alcohol dehydrogenase among Australian Drosophila species: correlation of ADH biochemical phenotype with ethanol resource utilisation. J Exp Zool 214:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura MT (1980) Evolution of food preferences in fungus-feeding Drosophila: an ecological study. Evolution 34:1009–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis N, Gibson JB (1978) Variation in the amount of enzyme protein in natural populations. Biochem Genet 16:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM, MacArthur RH (1972) Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:1109–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Monick JA (1968) Alcohols: their chemistry, properties and manufacture. Reinhold New York, 594 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursten HE (1970) Volatile compounds: the aroma of fruits. In: Hulme AC (ed) The biochemistry of fruits and their prodccts, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 239–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott JG, May TW, Gibson JB, Willcocks DA (1982) Resource partitioning in five domestic Drosophila species and its relationship to ethanol metabolism. Aust J Zool 30:547–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons PA (1983) The evolutionary biology of colonising species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 262

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka RR (1976) Competition and niche theory. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology Blackwell, Oxford, p 114–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Riek EF (1970) Hymenoptera. In: CSIRO (ed) The insects of Australia, Chapt 37. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 867–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Royes WV, Robertson FW (1964) The nutritional requirements and growth relations of different species of Drosophila. J Exp Zool 156:105–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang JH (1956) The quantitative nutritional requirements of Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 33:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang JH (1959) Circumstances affecting the nutritional requirements of Drosophila melanogaster. Ann NY Acad Sci 77:352–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang JH (1978) The nutritional requirements of Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 159–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT (1982) Associations and interactions among yeasts, Drosophila and their habitats. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, New York, pp 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Barker JSF (1986) Ecological genetics of the Adh-1 locus of Drosophila buzzatii. Biol J Linn Soc 28:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Barker JSF, Phaff HJ, Fogleman JC (1986) Adaptations of Drosophila and yeasts: their interactions with the volatile 2-propanol in the cactus-microorganism-Drosophila model system. Aust J Biol Sci 39:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Fogleman JC (1986) Coadaptation of Drosophila and yeasts in their natural habitat. J Chem Ecol 12:1037–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Heed WB, Miranda M, Miller MW, Phaff HJ (1976) The ecology of yeast flora associated with cactophilic Drosophila and their host plants in the Sonoran Desert. Microbiol Ecol 3:11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Phaff HJ, Miranda M, Miller MW, Heed WB (1982) The yeast flora associated with the decaying stems of columnar cacti and Drosophila in North America. Evol Biol 14:269–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacek DC (1982) Interactions between microorganisms and cactophilic Drosophila of Australia. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press. New York, pp 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacek DC, Starmer WT, Heed WB (1979) Relevance of the ecology of citrus yeasts to the diet of Drosophila. Microbiol Ecol 5:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Walt JP (1970) Criteria and methods used in classification. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts, a taxonomic study. North Holland. Amsterdam, pp 34–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RP (1944) The nutrition of Drosophila mulleri and D. aldrichi; growth of the larvae on cactus extract and the microorganisms found in cactus. Univ Texas Publ 4445:104–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oakeshott, J.G., Vacek, D.C. & Anderson, P.R. Effects of microbial floras on the distributions of five domestic Drosophila species across fruit resources. Oecologia 78, 533–541 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378745

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378745

Key words

Navigation