Skip to main content
Log in

Echolocation by cave swiftlets

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ability of cave dwelling swiftlets (Collocalia spodiopygius) to detect small cylindrical obstacles by echolocation was tested in a 3x9 m flight chamber. Although there was great individual variability, 6.3 mm obstacles were avoided much more often in total darkness than 1.5 wires (P<0.001). Flash photographs showed that the latter were avoided only by chance (about 50% misses). Obstacles 3.0 mm in diameter were avoided only slightly more often than 1.5 mm wires.

Even in the light these swiftlets avoided the obstacles in only about 75% of the trials, probably because gentle touches with the primary feathers caused little discomfort.

The 3.0 and 6.3 mm obstacles tended to be avoided more often on first encounters after they had been shifted horizontally by 10–30 cm, probably because the birds became more attentive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fenton MB (1975) Acuity of echolocation in Collocalia hirundinacea (Aves, Apodidae), with comments on the distributions of echolocating swiftlets and Molossid bats. Biotropica 7:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (reprinted 1974, Dover Publications, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR, Suthers RA (1970) Sensitivity of echolocation in cave swiftlets. Biol Bull 129:495–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR, McCue JJG, Grinnell AD (1963) The resistance of bats to jamming. J Exp Zool 152:229–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson OW, Schnitzler H-U (1980) Performance of airborne biosonar systems: II. Vertebrates other than microchiroptera. In: Busnel R-G, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum, New York, pp 183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen PH-S, McCarty JK (1978) Bats avoid small moving objects more successfully than stationary ones. Nature 275:743–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M, Knudsen EI (1979) The oilbird: hearing and echolocation. Science 204:425–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway L, Pye JD (1977) Echolocation and the systematics of swiftlets, chap 19. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins C (eds) Evolutionary ecology. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Moehres FP (1967) The role of spatial memory in the orientation. In: Busnel R-G (ed) Animal sonar systems, biology and bionics. Laboratoire de Physiologie Acoustique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp 129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth DM (1980) Studies on Echolocation in the grey swiftlet, Aerodramus spodiopygius. PhD thesis, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Australia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, D.R., Thompson, D. Echolocation by cave swiftlets. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10, 119–123 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300171

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300171

Keywords

Navigation