Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo effect of 5 French bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical probes on the porcine bladder

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous in vitro studies have indicated bipolar electrosurgical probes would electrodesiccate tissue in a normal saline solution. This study applies similar sized monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical probes to porcine bladder in order to compare each probe's effect in vivo. The power delivered by each probe was calculated; the width and depth of the porcine bladder damage was measured and the volume of the damage calculated. The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48 and 96 h post-procedure so that the amount of tissue destruction could be quantitated relative to the bladder's natural tissue reaction. The data shows the power (watts) delivered by the monopolar probe to be approximately six times that of the bipolar probe. Like-wise, the area of bladder wall damage was larger with monopolar at all time periods sampled and showed significant differences at 24 and 48 h. These studies indicate that in viable bladder, tissue bipolar probes will electrodessicate at a lower power and with less shortterm tissue damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collings CW (1932) Transurethral electrosurgery for the relief of prostatic obstruction. J Urol 28:529

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyt RH, Huang SK, Marcus FI, Odell RS (1986) Factors influencing trans-catheter radio frequency abalation of the myocardium. J Appl Cardiol 1:469

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hungerbuhler RF, Swope JP, Reves JG (1974) Ventricular fibrillation associated with use of electrosurgery. JAMA 230:432

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kriegmair M, Persel J, Hofstetter AG, Fastenmeier K, Rothenberger KH, Keiditsch E, Boemers TML (1987) Regulated high frequency diathermy for bipolar electrocoagulation — a new method for the treatment of carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Res 15:251

    Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott TE, Fitzpatrick JM, Suatengco D, Grossman BH (1987) A new probe for bipolar diathermy for upper urothelial tract tumors. J Urol 137:235A

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prentiss RJ, Harvey GW, Bethard WF, Boatwright DE, Rennington RD (1965) Massive adductor muscle contraction in transurethral surgery: cause and prevention development of new electrical circuitry. J Urol 93:264

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramsay JW, Shepherd NA, Butler M, Gosling PT, Miller RA, Wallace DM, Whitfield HN (1985) A comparison of bipolar and monopolar diathermy probes in experimental animals. Urol Res 13:99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tucker RD, Schmitt OH, Sievert CE, Silvis SE (1984) Demodulated low frequency currents from electrosurgical procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tucker RD, Kramolowsky EV, Platz CE (1988) Comparison of urologic application of bipolar versus monopolar five french electrosurgical probes. J Urol 141:662

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tucker RD, Stasz PS, Kramolowsky EV, Platz CE (1989) A simple and inexpensive method for measuring electrosurgical variables. Biomed Instrum Tech 23:54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucker, R.D., Kramolowsky, E.V. & Platz, C.E. In vivo effect of 5 French bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical probes on the porcine bladder. Urol. Res. 18, 291–294 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294777

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294777

Keywords

Navigation