Skip to main content
Log in

Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men?

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six experiments investigated the commonly expressed view that the pronoun he, when used generically, may lead individuals to think more often of male referents. The first experiment validated a semantic differential scale which was constructed to unobtrusively measure subjects' impressions of stimulus persons. In the five subsequent experiments, descriptions of various stimulus persons were presented alternating the use of the pronouns he, they, or he/she. No support was found for a pure pronoun effect. However, some evidence was found for a masculine bias when the word man was combined with he. The results provide little support for the often cited claim that the use of the generic pronoun, per se, leads to increased thoughts of men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APA Task Force on Issues of Sexual Bias in Graduate Education. Guidelines for nonsexist use of language. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 682–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geivitz, J. Another plea for “E.” APA Monitor, August 1978, p. 3.

  • Harrison, L. Cro-magnon woman — in eclipse. Science Teacher, 1975, 42 (April), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, V. A study of the images produced through the use of male pronouns as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communications, 1971, 1, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyna, W. What does “he” mean? Use of the generic masculine. Communication, 1978, 3, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Swift, K. Words and women. New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. Sex bias in language use. “Neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1032–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 1973, 8, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, N. J. Can “she” and “he” coexist? American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 782–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, M., & Craddick, R. A. A semantic differential investigation of sexually symbolic concepts. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1969, 33, 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Melodie Smith for serving as an experimenter in Experiment 5 and for assisting with data summary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, C.M., Hill, F.A. & Dayley, L.J. Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men?. Sex Roles 9, 737–750 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289802

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289802

Keywords

Navigation