Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to submit the claim of sex-related bias in clinical judgment to more thorough empirical testing than had been the case in previous research. Patient sex and stereotypic sex-role were factorially varied in a clinical protocol that was sent with related materials to 640 sex-stratified, randomly selected Members and Fellows of APA Division 29 (Psychotherapy). Approximately 30% (N=182) of those contacted returned usable data, including information about their own sex-role traditionalism and evaluation of the hypothetical patients' psychological well-being. Results confirmed the effectiveness of the stereotypic sex-role manipulation. However, no consistent effects were found for any of the four variables of interest considered in isolation or in combination, thereby refuting allegations of covert sex-related discrimination perpetrated under the aegis of psychological appraisal. Favorableness of clinical impressions was not mediated by therapists' self-reported attitudes toward the patients. The study's generally unexpected outcome was tentatively attributed to enhanced professional sensitization to the sociocultural barriers to full psychological functioning in women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, S. I., Abramowitz, C. V., Jackson, C., & Gomes, B. The politics of clinical judgment: What nonliberal examiners infer about women who don't stifle themselves. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 41, 385–391.
Adinolfi, A. A. Relevance of person perception research to clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 167–176.
Anderson, N. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 272–279.
Bem, S. L. Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
Braginsky, D. D., & Braginsky, B. M. Mainstream psychology: A critique. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., & Vogel, S. R. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.
Byrne, D. Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Goffman, E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Gold, A. R., Friedman, L. N., & Christie, R. The anatomy of revolutionists. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1971, 1, 26–43.
Goldstein, A. P. Psychotherapeutic attraction. New York: Pergamon, 1971.
Gump, J. P. Sex-role attitudes and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 79–92.
Haan, N., & Livson, N. Sex differences in the eyes of expert personality assessors: Blind spots? Journal of Personality Assessment, 1973, 37, 486–492.
Halleck, S. L. The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.
Koscherak, S., & Masling, J. Noblesse oblige effect: The interpretation of Rorschach responses as a function of ascribed social class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 39, 415–419.
Kurtz, N., Kurtz, R., & Hoffnung, R. Attitudes toward lower-and middle-class psychiatric patients as a function of authoritarianism among mental health students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 338–341.
Lewittes, D. J., Moselle, J. A., & Simmons, H. L. Sex-role bias in clinical judgments based on Rorschach interpretations. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, August, 1973.
Lipset, S. M., & Ladd, E. C., Jr. The politics of American sociologists. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 78, 67–101.
Little, K. B., & Shneidman, E. S. Congruencies among interpretations of psychological test and anamnestic data. Psychological Monographs, 1959, 73(6, Whole No. 476).
McClelland, D. C., & Watt, N. F. Sex-role alienation in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968, 73, 226–239.
McKee, J. P., & Sherriffs, A. C. The differential evaluation of male and female. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 356–371.
Mead, M. Male and female. New York: William Morrow, 1949.
Neulinger, J. Perceptions of the optimally integrated person: A redefinition of mental health. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1968, 553–554.
Sawyer, J. Measurement and prediction: Clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 178–200.
Schwartz, J. M., & Abramowitz, S. I. Value-related effects on psychiatric judgment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1975, 32, 1525–1529.
Sheriffs, A. C., and McKee, J. P. Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 451–464.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. The attitudes toward women scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1972, 2, 66. (a)
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Who likes competent women? Competence, sex-role congruence of interests, and subjects' attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1972, 2, 197–213. (b)
Strupp, H. H. Psychotherapists in action. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1960.
Strupp, H. H. Psychotherapy: Clinical, research, and theoretical issues. New York: Jason Aronson, 1973.
Szasz, T. S. The manufacture of madness. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
Welkowitz, J., Cohen, J., & Ortmeyer, B. Value system similarity: Investigation of patient—therapist dyads. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 48–55.
Williams, J. H. Sexual role identification and personality functioning in giris: A theory revisited. Journal of Personality, 1973, 41, 1–8.
Yamamoto, J., James, Q. C., Bloombaum, M., & Hattem, J. Racial factors in patient selection. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1967, 124, 630–636.
Zigler, E., & Phillips, L. Psychiatric diagnosis: A critique. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 607–618.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is based on a master's thesis written by the first author under the sponsorship of the second and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree at Vanderbilt University, 1974. The research was supported in part by the Vanderbilt University Research Council. The contributions of Stephen Amira and Joseph M. Schwartz are gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomes, B., Abramowitz, S.I. Sex-related patient and therapist effects on clinical judgment. Sex Roles 2, 1–13 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289293
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289293