Skip to main content
Log in

Differential physiological and morphological responses of inbred lines to the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by cultured Helianthus annuus (sunflower) shoot tips

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The four Helianthus annuus (sunflower) inbred lines examined showed different abilities to convert 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to ethylene and different morphological responses to exogenous ACC, however, ACC had no effect on precocious flowering. The greatest effect of ACC was seen with inbred SS405B where it suppressed shoot growth and induced hypocotyl enlargement and callus induction. The greatest response did not correlate with the highest ethylene production. Although each inbred responded differently, callus induction and hypocotyl enlargement observed in hypocotyl segments treated with naphthalene acetic acid and benzyladenine could be partially explained as ethylene-mediated effects of the two hormones. It is suggested that inbred differences could be due to different endogenous hormone levels and/or different sensitivities to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACC:

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

AVG:

aminoethoxyvinylglycine

BA:

benzyladenine

NAA:

naphthalene acetic acid

References

  • Abeles FB (1967) Plant Physiol. 42:608–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman WK, Huxter TJ, Reid DM, Thorpe, TA (1980) Physiol. Plant 48:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornejo-Martin MJ, Mingo-Castel AM, Primo-Millo E (1979) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 94:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett NP (1982) In: Akio Fujiwara (ed.) Proc. 5th Intl. Congr. Plant Tissue Culture, The Japanese Association for Plant Tissue Culture, pp. 93–94

  • Gamborg OL, LaRue TAG (1971) Plant Physiol. 48:399–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady KL, Bassham JA (1982) Plant Physiol. 70:919–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxter TJ, Reid DM, Thorpe TA (1979) Physiol. Plant 46:374–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxter TJ, Thorpe TA, Reid DM (1981) Physiol. Plant 53:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaseki H, Kondo K, Watanabe A (1975) Plant and Cell Physiol. 16:777–787

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRue TAG, Gamborg OL (1971) Plant Physiol. 48:394–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TT, Dumas T (1983) Plant Physiol. Suppl. 72:39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M (1979) Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizada MCC, Yang SF (1979) Anal. Biochem. 100:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins-Loucao MA, Rodriguez-Barrueco C (1983) Physiol. Plant. 58:204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AR, Pengelly WL (1983) Plant Physiol. Suppl. 72:38

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AR, Pengelly WL (1984) Planta 161:418–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson KE (1984) Amer. J. Bot. 71:925–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci R (1972) Experimenta 28:597–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose E, Kirkham MB (1983) Plant Physiol. Suppl. 72:38

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenlid G (1982) Physiol. Plant 56:500–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B, Murashige T (1977) Plant Physiol. 60:437–439

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. Maliga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, K.E.P., Adams, D.O. & Lee, R.y. Differential physiological and morphological responses of inbred lines to the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by cultured Helianthus annuus (sunflower) shoot tips. Plant Cell Reports 6, 405–409 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272769

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272769

Keywords

Navigation