Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methotrexate administered by 6-h and 24-h infusion: a pharmacokinetic comparison

  • Original Articles
  • Pharmacokinetics, Methotrexate
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pharmacokinetics of 8 g/m2 methotrexate (MTX) was compared following short (6 h) and long (24 h) infusions of the drug to 11 children with osteogenic sarcoma (OS; 42 infusion) and 28 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL: 118 infusions), respectively. No difference was observed in the first-phase half-life, in systemic clearance or in the volume of distribution of the drug (P>0.05). The concentration of MTX at the end of the infusion was ∼4-fold higher when the drug was given over only 6 h. However, patients receiving 24-h infusions had ∼9-fold higher levels by 24 h after the beginning of the infusion. The area under the data curve from start of the MTX infusion until the beginning of folinic acid rescue administration was significantly higher in patients with osteogenic sarcoma (6-h infusions), while the area under the log-data curve was significantly longer in the ALL group (24-h infusions) for the same period. The latter parameter is considered to be characteristic for the concentration-time-effect relationship. The longer duration of MTX administration (with delayed rescue) is thought to be more beneficial from the pharmacokinetic aspect. Patients with osteogenic sarcoma had significantly lower concentrations of MTX at the end of their last treatment with MTX than at the end of the first infusion. Patients developing MTX toxicity had shorter half-lives of MTX in the beta phase. It is suggested that cisplatin induced tubular loss of MTX and folinic acid is responsible for these observations. A wider application of clinical pharmacologic findings in the practice of the administration of cytostatics is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bender RA (1975) Membrane transport of methotrexate (NSC-740) in human neoplastic cells. Cancer Chemother Rep 6: 73

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bode U (1986) Methotrexate as relapse therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 8: 70

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borsi JD (1984) Simple assay of methotrexate for the practice of clinical oncology. Orv Hetil 125: 2629

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borsi JD, Klepp O, Moe PJ (1986) PharmCalc: Program for the calculation of clinical pharmacokinetic parameters of methotrexate. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (submitted for publication)

  5. Buchmann S, Fengler R, Hartmann R, Laskari J, Wolfrom C, Ebell W, Gutjahr P, Havers W, Janka G, Neuhaus C, Suder J, Henze G (1987) Comparison of intermediate versus high dose methotrexate for relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Fourth International Symposium on Therapy of Acute Leukemias, Rome, abstract book, p 405

  6. Chabner BA, Young RC (1973) Threshold methotrexate concentration for in vivo inhibition of DNA synthesis in normal and tumorous target tissues. J Clin Invest 52: 1804

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffe N, Keifer R III, Robertson R, Takue Y (1987) Renal toxicity with cumulative doses of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum-II in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer 59: 1577

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klepp O (1986) Statmed program in GWBASIC. Nycomed, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magrath IT, Spiegel RJ, Edwards BK, et al. (1980) Altered relapse pattern of Burkitt lymphoma in America. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21: 348

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moe PJ, Kolmannskog S, Finne PH, Seip M, Wesenberg F (1987) Methotrexate infusions in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Fourth International Symposium on Therapy of Acute Leukemias Rome, abstract book, p 188

  11. Monjanel S, Rigault JP, Cano JP (1979) High-dose methotrexate: preliminary evaluation of a pharmacokinetic approach. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 3: 189

    Google Scholar 

  12. Myers CE, Lippman ME, Eliot HM, Chabner BA (1975) Competitive protein binding assay for methotrexate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 3683

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohnuma T, Lo RJ, Scanlon KJ, Kamen BA, Ohnoshi T, Wolman SR, Holland JF (1985) Evolution of methotrexate resistance of human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in vitro Cancer Res 45: 1815

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pinedo HM, Chabner BA (1977) Role of drug concentration, duration of exposure, and endogenous metabolites in determining methotrexate cytotoxicity. Cancer Treat Rep 61: 709

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowland M, Tozer TN (1980) Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sirotnak FM, Donsbach RC (1974) The intracellular concentration dependence of antifolate inhibition of DNA synthesis in L1210 leukemia cells. Cancer Res 34: 3332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work reported in this paper was supported by a research grant from the Norwegian Cancer Society (Landsforeningen mot Kreft)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borsi, J.D., Schuler, D. & Moe, P.J. Methotrexate administered by 6-h and 24-h infusion: a pharmacokinetic comparison. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 22, 33–35 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254177

Keywords

Navigation