Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Fieldmaster 101 PR automatic visual field screener-Technical evaluation and clinical results

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The perimetric concept and the technical construction of the Fieldmaster 101 PR were evaluated. 64 eyes of patients and 10 normal subjects were examined. We conclude that the Fieldmaster is a well-engineered instrument, using an inefficient test strategy. The presentation of visual field results could be impoved. Clinical results of the patient examinations are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Boer RW and van den Berg TJTP (1982) The Competer automatic campimeter. Technical description and evaluation. Docum Ophthal 53: 295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannheim F (1980) Clinical experiences with a semi-automated perimeter (Fieldmaster) Int Opthalmol 21: 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong C and Kitazawa Y (1982) Use of Fieldmaster Automated Perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 4: 151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CA & JL Keltner. Comparison of manual and automated perimetry in 1000 eyes. Computers in Ophthalmology Meeting (April, 1979a)

  • Johnson CA, JL Keltner & FG Balestrery. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease. Opthalmolgy 86: 1278–1286 (1979b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CA & JL Keltner. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield I, CFA-120 and Fieldmaster Model PR automated perimeters. Ophthalmology 87: 777–784 (1980a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CA & JL Keltner. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry: Follow-up study of the Fieldmaster Model 101 PR. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 731–741 (1980b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner JL, CA Johnson & FG Balestry. Suprathreshold static perimetry: intial trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter. Arch Ophthalmol. 97: 260–272 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner JL & CA Johnson. Mass visual field screening in a driving population. Opthalmology 87: 785–790 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumie K, H Nakatani & K Maeda. Clinical trials with the Fieldmaster 101 PR perimeter. Folia Ophthalmologica Japonica 31: 483–490 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, P.O. Box 6411, 1005, EK Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    R. W. De Boer, T. J. T. P. Van Den Berg, E. L. Greve & H. J. Bos

Authors
  1. R. W. De Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. J. T. P. Van Den Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. L. Greve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. J. Bos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Boer, R.W., Van Den Berg, T.J.T.P., Greve, E.L. et al. The Fieldmaster 101 PR automatic visual field screener-Technical evaluation and clinical results. Doc Ophthalmol 53, 311–320 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216792

Key words

Search

Navigation