We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Do animal models have a place in the genetic analysis of quantitative human behavioural traits?

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It seems that the genetic basis of common psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia and manic-depressive psychosis is amenable to the genetic mapping strategies that have been successful in other complex disorders such as diabetes. The next challenge is the genetic dissection of quantitative behavioural traits such as mood, personality and intelligence. Quantitative traits pose new problems for gene cloning experiments. We argue that one way forward is by using animal models. One of the features of quantitative traits is that the DNA sequence variants which are responsible for them are unlikely to be immediately recognizable. In contrast to many qualitative traits where a discrete phenotypic difference is often the consequence of an inactivating mutation, the allelic variation responsible for quantitative traits probably has a more subtle basis. This distinction means that strategies to clone the genetic basis of quantitative behavioural traits will have to rely on functional assays of alleles thought to be important in determining the phenotype. We suggest that an efficient strategy for detecting sequences that give rise to quantitative behavioural traits can be devised in the mouse. The importance and utility of the mouse for quantitative trait analysis make it worthwhile to investigate mouse models of human behaviour; these advantages outweigh the difficulties that arise in attempts to validate the animal models. As an example we review the evidence that validates rodent emotionality as an animal model for susceptibility to human anxiety. We show that there is good evidence that rodent emotionality is a central nervous system state with a genetic basis, and that there are neuropharmacological and neuroanatomical parallels with human anxiety. Furthermore, our own work has shown that the genetic basis of the trait is relatively simple, and that the task of characterizing it at a molecular level is feasible. We expect that future experiments will show us how genetic variation gives rise to quantitative behavioural traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MR :

Maudsley reactive

MNR :

Maudsleynon-reactive

OFA :

Open-field activity

OFD :

Open-field defecation

RHA :

Roman high-avoidance

RLA :

Roman low-avoidance

References

  1. Lander ES, Schork NJ (1994) Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037–2048

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubay C (1993) Genetic determinants of diastolic and pulse pressure map to different loci in Lyon hypertensive rats. Nature Genet 3:354–357

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gauguier D, Froguel P, Parent V, Bernard C, Bihoreau M, Portha B, James MR, Penicaud L, Lathrop M, Ktorza A (1996) Chromosomal mapping of genetic loci associated with non-in-sulin dependent diabetes in the GK rat. Nature Genet 12:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moises HW, Yang L, Kristbjarnarson H, Wiese C, Byerley W, Macciardi F, Arolt V, Blackwood D, Lio X, B. Sjögren, Aschauer HN, Hwu H-G, Jang K, Livesley WJ, Kennedy JL, Zoega T, Ivarsson O, Bui M-T, Yu M-H, Havsteen B, Commenges D, Weissenbach J, Schwinger E, Gottesman II, Pakstis AJ, Wetterberg L, Kidd KK, Helgason T (1995) An international two-stage genome wide search for schizophrenia susceptibility genes. Nature Genet 11:321–324

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antonarakis SE, Blouin J-L, Pulver AE, Wolyniec P, Lasseter VK, Nestadt G, Kasch L, Babb R, Kazazian HH, Dombroski B, Ott J, Karayiorgou M, C.J. MacLean (1995) Schizophrenia susceptibility and chromosome 6p24–22. Nature Genet 11:235–236

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berrettini WH, Ferraro TN, Goldin LR, Weeks DE, DeteraWadleigh S, Nurnberger JI, Gershon ES (1994) Chromosome 18 DNA markers and manic depressive illness. Evidence for a susceptibility locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5918–5921

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab SG, Albus M, Hallmayer J, Honig S, Borrmann M, Lichtermann D, Ebstein RP, Ackenheil M, Lerer B, Risch N, Maier W, Wildenauer DB (1995) Evaluation of a susceptibilitygene for schizophrenia on chromsome 6p by multipoint affected sib-pair linkage analysis. Nature Genet 11:325–326

    Google Scholar 

  8. Straub RE, MacLean C. J. A. O, Burke J, Murphy B, Duke F, Shinkwin R, Webb BT, Zhang J, Walsh D, Kendler KS (1995) A potential vulnerability locus for schizophrenia on chromsome 6p24–22: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Nature Genet 11:287–292

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stine OC, Xu J, Koskela R, McMahon FJ, Gschwend M, Friddle C, Clark CD, McInnis MG, Simpson SG, Breschel TS, Vishio E, Riskin K, Feilcotter H, Chen E, Shen S, Folstein S, Meyers DA, Botstein D, Marr TG, DePaulo JR (1995) Evidence for linkage of bipolar disorder to chromosome 18 with aparent-of-origin effect. Am J Hum Genet 57:1384–1394

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ross CA, McInnis MG, Margolis RL, Li SH (1993) Genes with triplet repeats: candidate mediators of neuropsychiatric disorders. Trends Neurosci 16:254–260

    Google Scholar 

  11. Copeman JB, Cucca F, Hearne CM, Cornall RJ, Reed PW, Ronningen KS, Undlien DE, Nistico L, Tosi R, Pociot F, Nerup J, Cornelis F, Barnett AH, Bain SC, Todd JA (1995) Linkage disequilibrium mapping of a type 1 diabetes susceptibilitygene (IDDM7) to chromosome 2q31-q33. Nature Genet 9:80–85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet 52:506–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willner P (1990) Animal models for clinical psychopharmacology: depression, anxiety, schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatry 2:253–276

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collins F (1995) Positional cloning moves from perditional to traditional. Nature Genet 9:347–350

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall CS (1934) Emotional behaviour in the rat. I. Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. J Comp Psychol 22:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stouffer SA, Lumsdaine AA, Lumsdaine MH, Williams RN, Smith MB, Janis IL, Star SA, Cottrell LS (1949) Studies in social psychology in World War II: the American soldier: combat and its aftermath. Princeton Unviersity Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Archer J (1973) Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: A review. Anim Behav 21:205–235

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray JA (1982) The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the function of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gray JA (1987) The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. DeFries JC, Gervais MC, Thomas EA (1978) Response to 30 generations of selection for open field activity in laboratory mice. Behav Genet 5:3–213

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levine S, Broadhurst PL (1963) Genetic and ontogenetic influences on later emotionality in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56:423–428

    Google Scholar 

  22. Owen S (1962) The effect of avoidance response extinction in rats of CS and continuation and emotional constitution. J Genet Psychol 103:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  23. Broadhurst PL (1960) Application of biometrical genetics to the inheritance of behaviour. In: Eysenck HJ (eds) Experiments in personality. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp 3–102

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bignami G (1965) Selection for high rates and low rates of avoidance conditioning in the rat. Behav Res Ther 2:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  25. Broadhurst PL, Bignami G(1965) Correlative effect of psychogenetic selection: a study of the Roman high and low avoidance strains of rats. Behav Res Ther 2:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  26. Driscoll P, Woodson P, Fuem H, Battig K (1980) Selection for two way avoidance deficit inhibits shock-induced fighting in the rat. Physiol Behav 24:793–795

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chamove AS, Sanders DC (1980) Emotional correlates of selection for avoidance learning in rats. Biol Psychiatry 10:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  28. Driscoll P, Battig K (1982) Behavioral, emotional and neurochemical profiles of rats selected for extreme differences in active two way avoidance. In: Lieblich eds Genetics of the brain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 95–123

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gentsch C, Lichtsteiner M, Feer H (1981) Locomoter activity, defecation score and corticosterone levels during an open-field exposure: a comparison among individually and group-housed rats, and genetically selected rat lines. Physiol Behav 27:183–186

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rawlins JNP, Feldon J, Tonkiss J, Coffey PJ (1989)The role of subicular outputs in the development of the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Exp Brain Res 77:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gray JA, McNaughton N (1983) Comparison between the ‘behavioural’ effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:119–188

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schwegler H, Lipp H-P (1983) Hereditary covariations of neuronal circuitry and behaviour: correlations between the proportions of hippocampal synaptic fields in the regio inferior and two-way avoidance in mice and rats. Behav Brain Res 7:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schwegler H, Lipp H-P, van der Loos H, Buselmaier W (1981) Individual hippocampal mossy fibre distribution in mice correlates with two-way avoidance performance. Science 214:817–819

    Google Scholar 

  34. Redmond DE (1985) Neurochemical basis for anxiety and anxiety based disorders: evidence from drugs which decrease human fear or anxiety. In: Tuma AH, Maser JD eds Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 530–555

    Google Scholar 

  35. Soubrie P (1986) Reconciling the role of serotonin neurons in human and animal behaviour. Behav Brain Sci 9:319–363

    Google Scholar 

  36. Redmond DE(1986) The possible role of locus coeruleus noradrenergic activity in anxiety-panic. Clin Neuropharmacol 9: 40–42

    Google Scholar 

  37. Flint J, Corley R, DeFries JC, Fulker DW, Gray JA, Miller S, Collins AC (1995) A simple genetic basis for a complex psychological trait in laboratory mice. Science 269:1432–1435

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pellow S, Chopin P, File S, Briley M (1985) Validation of open:closed arms entries in an elevated plus maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 14:149–167

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pellow S, File SE (1986) Anxiolytic and anxiogenic drug effects in exploratory activity in an elevated plus-maze: a novel test of anxiety in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Plomin R, Owen M, McGuffin P (1994). The genetic basis of complex human behaviours. Science 264:1733–1739

    Google Scholar 

  41. Crabbe J, Belknap JK, Buck KJ (1994) Genetic animal models of alcohol and drug abuse. Science 264:1715–1723

    Google Scholar 

  42. McCouch, SR, Doerge RW (1995) QTL mapping in rice. Trends Genet 11:482–487

    Google Scholar 

  43. Frankel WN (1995) Taking stock of complex trait genetics in mice. Trends Genet 11:471–477

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stuber CW (1995) Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize. Trends Genet 11:477–481

    Google Scholar 

  45. Risch N, Ghosh S, Todd JA (1993) Statistical evaluation of multiple-locus linkage data in experimental species and its relevance to human studies: application to nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse and human insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 53:702–714

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paterson AH, Lin Y-R, Li Z, Schertz KF, Doebley JF, Pinsn SRM, Liu S-C, Stansel JW, Irvine JE (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by indepencent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269:1714–1718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cases O, Seif I, Grimsby J, Gaspar P, Chen K, Pournin S, Muuler U, Agyet M, Babinet C, Shih JC, DeMaeyer E (1995) Aggressive behaviour and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science 268:1763–1766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nelson RJ, Demas GE, Huang PL, Fishman MC, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Snyder SH (1995) Behavioural abnormalities in male mice lacking neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Nature 378:383–386

    Google Scholar 

  49. Brunner HG, Nelen MR, van Zandvoort P, Abeling NGGM, vanGennip AH, Wolters EC, Kuiper MA, Ropers HH, vanOost BA (1993a) X-linked borderline mental retardation with prominent behavioral disturbance: phenotype, genetic localizaion, and evidence for disturbed monoamine metabolism. Am J Hum Genet 52:1032–1039

    Google Scholar 

  50. Brunner HG, Nelen M, Breakefield XO, Ropers HH, van Oost BA (1993b) Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262:578–580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bourtchuladze R, Frenguelli B, Blendy J, Cioffi D, Schutz G, Silva AJ (1994) Deficient long-term memory in mice with a targeted mutation of the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. Cell 79:59–68

    Google Scholar 

  52. Huang Y-Y, Li X-C, Kandel ER (1994) cAMP contributes to mossy fiber LTP by initiating both a covalently mediated early phase and macromolecular synthesis-dependent late phase. Cell 79:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  53. Grant SGN, O'Dell TJ, Karl KA, Stein PL, Soriano P, Kandel ER (1992) Impaired long-term potentiation, spatial learning and hippocampal development in fyn mutant mice. Science 258:1903–1910

    Google Scholar 

  54. Silva AJ, Stevens CF, Tonegawa S, Wang Y (1992a) Deficient hippocampal long-term potentiation in α-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. Science 257:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  55. Silva AJ, Paylor R, Wehner JM, Tonegawa S(1992b) Impaired spatial learning in a-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. Science 257:206–211

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flint, J., Corley, R. Do animal models have a place in the genetic analysis of quantitative human behavioural traits?. J Mol Med 74, 515–521 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204977

Key words

Navigation