Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of retroposition in plants based on a family of SINEs from Brassica napus

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identification of a family of SINE retroposons dispersed in the genome of oilseed rape Brassica napus has provided the basis for an evolutionary analysis of retroposition in plants. The repetitive elements (called S1Bn) are 170 by long and occupy roughly 500 loci by haploid genome. They present characteristic features of SINE retroposons such as a 3′ terminal A-rich region, two conserved polymerase III motifs (box A and B), flanking direct repeats of variable sizes, and a primary and secondary sequence homology to several tRNA species. A consensus sequence was made from the alignment of 34 members of the family. The retroposon population was divided into five subfamilies based on several correlated sets of mutations from the consensus. These precise separations in subfamilies based on “diagnostic” mutations and the random distribution of mutations observed inside each subfamily are consistent with the master sequence model proposed for the dispersion of mammalian retroposons. An independent analysis of each subfamily provides strong evidence for the coexpression of at least three subfamily master sequences (SMS). In contrast to mammalian retroposition, diagnostic positions are not shared between SMS. We therefore propose that SMS were all derived from a general master sequence (GMS) and independently activated for retroposition after a variable period of random drift. Possible models for plant retroposition are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SMS:

subfamily master sequence

GMS:

general master sequence

References

  • Antequera F, Bird AP (1988) Unmethylated CpG islands associated with genes in higher plant DNA. Embo J 7:2295–2299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird AP (1987) CpG islands as gene markers in the vertebrate nucleus. Trends Genet 3:342–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten RJ, Baron WF, Stout DB, Davidson EH (1988) Sources and evolution of human Alu repeated sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4770–4774

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, J (1991) Retroposition-seeds of evolution. Science 251:753

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown TC, Jiricny J (1987) A specific mismatch repair event protects mammalian cells from loss of 5-methylcytosine. Cell 50:945–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger PL (1989) SINEs: short interspersed repeated DNA elements in higher eucaryotes. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 619–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger PL, Batzer MA, Hutchison CA III, Edgell MH (1992) Master genes in mammalian repetitive DNA amplification. Trends Genet 8:307–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessen P, Fondrat C, Valencien, C, Mugnier C (1990) A french service for access to biomolecular sequence databases. Comput Appl Biosci 6:355–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouin G, Dover GA (1987) A plant processed pseudogene. Nature 328:557–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews GN, Goldberg RB (1989) Genetic control of flower development. Trends Genet 5:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans IM, Gatehouse LN, Gatehouse YA, Yarwood JN, Boulter D, Croy RRD (1990) The extensine gene family in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): characterisation of sequences of representative members of the family. Mol Gen Genet 223:273–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontdevila A (1992) Genetic instability and rapid speciation: are they coupled. Genetica 86:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenbaum Y., Naveh-Many T., Cedar H, Razin A (1981) Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292:860–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes SR, Jelinek WR (1981) Low molecular weight RNAs transcribed in vitro by RNA polymerase III from Alu-type dispersed repeats in Chinese hamster DNA are also found in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:6130–6134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GB, Andrew SE, McDonald H, Golberg YP, Graham R, Rommens JM, Hayden MR (1993) An Alu element retroposition in two families with Huntington disease defines a new active Alu subfamily. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3379–3383

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwu HR, Robert JW, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1986) Insertion and/or deletion of many repeated DNA sequences in human and higher ape evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3875–3879

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurka J (1993) A new subfamily of recently retroposed human Alu repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 21:2252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurka J, Smith T (1988) A fundamental division in the Alu family of repeated sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4775–4778

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazazian HH, Wong C, Youssoufian H, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE (1988) Haemophilia A resulting from de novo insertion of L2 sequences represents a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature 332:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kido Y, Aono M, Yamaki T, Matsumoto K, Murata S, Saneyoshi M, Okada N (1991) Shaping and reshaping of salmonid genomes by amplification of tRNA-derived retroposons during evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2326–2330

    Google Scholar 

  • King CC (1992) Modular transposition and the dynamic structure of eukaryote regulatory evolution. Genetica 86:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuda D, Striker G (1989) Sequence conservation in Alu evolution Nucleic Acids Res 17:2477–2491

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry BS, Hubert N, Etch T, Harada JJ, Lincoln SE (1991) A genetic map for Brassica napus based on RFLP markers. Genome 34:543–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundwall AB, Wetsel RA, Kristensen T, Whitehead AS, Woods DE, Ogden RC, Colten HR, Tack BF (1985) Isolation and sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding the fifth complement component. J Biol Chem 260:2108–2112

    Google Scholar 

  • Matera AG, Hellmann U, Hintz MF, Schmid CW (1990) Recently transposed Alu repeats result from multiple source genes. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6019–6023

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki K, Umeda M, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E (1992) Characterization of a plant SINE, p-SINEI, in rice genome. Jpn J Genet 67:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisson PE, Hickey RJ, Boshar MF, Crain WR (1988) Identification of a repeated sequence in the genome of sea urchin which is transcribed by RNA polymerase III and contains the features of a retroposon. Nucleic Acids Res 16:1431–1452

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada N (1990) Transfer RNA-like structure of the human Alu family: implications of its generation mechanism and possible functions. J Mol Evol 31:500–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JH (1985) The origin and evolution of retroposons. Int Rev Cytol 93:187–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fristch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid CW, Shen C-KJ (1985) The evolution of interspersed repetitive DNA sequences in mammals and other vertebrates. In: MacIntyre RJ (ed) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum Press, New York, pp 323–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorderet DF, Gartler S (1992) Analysis of CpG suppression in methylated and nonmethylated species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:957–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz-Sommer Z, Leclercz L, Gobel E, Saedler H (1987) Cin4, an insert altering the structure of Al gene in Zea Mays, exhibits properties of nonviral retrotransposons. EMBO J 6:3873–3880

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro JA (1992) Natural genetic engineering in evolution. Genetica 86:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Mehta S, Morgan J, Maizel A. (1987) Molecular cloning and expression of a human B-cell growth factor gene in Escherichia coli. Science 235:1489–1492

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnett D, Richer C, Deragon J-M, Labuda D (1992) Alu RNA transcripts in human embryonal carcinoma cells; Model of post-transcriptional selection of master sequences. J Mol Biol 226:689–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth DR (1991) Dispersed repeats in plant genomes. Chromosoma 100:355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinzl M, Hartmann T, Meissner F, Moll J, Vorderwulbecke T (1987) Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 15(Suppl.):r53-r188

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RM, Novick GE, Gao G-P, Herrera RJ (1992) Genome canalization: the coevolution of transposable and interspersed repetitive elements with single copy DNA. Genetica 86:215–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MR, Andersen LB, Saulino AM, Gregory PE, Glover TW, Collins FS (1991) A de novo Alu insertion results in neurofibromatosis type 1. Nature 353:864–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe KH, Li W-H, Sharp PM (1987) Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:9054–9058

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Eickbush T (1988) Similarity of reverse transcriptase-like sequences of viruses, transposable elements, and mitochondrial introns. Mol Cell Biol 8:114–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka Y, Matsumoto S, Kojima S, Ohshima K, Okada N, Machida Y (1993) Molecular characterization of a short interspersed repetitive element from tobacco that exhibits sequence homology to specific tRNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:6562–6566

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuker M (1989) Computer prediction of RNA structure. Methods Enzymol 180:262–288

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: J.-M. Deragon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deragon, J.M., Landry, B.S., Pélissier, T. et al. An analysis of retroposition in plants based on a family of SINEs from Brassica napus . J Mol Evol 39, 378–386 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160270

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160270

Key words

Navigation