Skip to main content
Log in

Allometry of mammalian cellular oxygen consumption

  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In the 1930s, Max Kleiber and Samuel Brody established that the interspecies correlation between mammalian body mass and metabolic rate (αM0.75) cannot be explained (solely) by whole body surface area (αM0.66) to volume ratios. Metabolic considerations must also be taken into account. Decreases in the proportion of visceral organ mass to whole body mass can account for some of the whole body metabolic differences. However, superimposed upon these anatomical differences, the metabolism of tissues and cells has been demonstrated to decrease with increasing body mass. These decreases in oxygen consumption rates (with increasing body mass) in cells and tissues can be explained by a decrease in ATP turnover and mitochondrial density and an increase in mitochondrial functional efficiency (decrease in proton leak). The majority of the proton leak differences reflect differences in mitochondrial inner membrane surface area. Indeed, liver metabolism correlates directly with liver mitochondrial inner membrane surface area. Apart from being a significant contributor (~25 %) to basal metabolism, mitochondrial proton leak is a major factor determining the differences in basal metabolism between mammals of different body mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received 31 May 2000; received after revision 2 October 2000; accepted 14 November 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, R. Allometry of mammalian cellular oxygen consumption. CMLS, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58, 815–822 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000902

Navigation