Skip to main content
Log in

Helicity decomposition of ghost-free massive gravity

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We perform a helicity decomposition in the full Lagrangian of the class of Massive Gravity theories previously proven to be free of the sixth (ghost) degree of freedom via a Hamiltonian analysis. We demonstrate, both with and without the use of nonlinear field redefinitions, that the scale at which the first interactions of the helicity-zero mode come in is \( {\Lambda_{{3}}} = {\left( {{M_{\text{Pl}}}{m^{{2}}}} \right)^{{{1}/{3}}}} \), and that this is the same scale at which helicity-zero perturbation theory breaks down. We show that the number of propagating helicity modes remains five in the full nonlinear theory with sources. We clarify recent misconceptions in the literature advocating the existence of either a ghost or a breakdown of perturbation theory at the significantly lower energy scales, \( {\Lambda_{{5}}} = {\left( {{M_{\text{Pl}}}{m^{{4}}}} \right)^{{{1}/{5}}}} \) or \( {\Lambda_{{4}}} = {\left( {{M_{\text{Pl}}}{m^{{3}}}} \right)^{{{1}/{4}}}} \), which arose because relevant terms in those calculations were overlooked. As an interesting byproduct of our analysis, we show that it is possible to derive the Stückelberg formalism from the helicity decomposition, without ever invoking diffeomorphism invariance, just from a simple requirement that the kinetic terms of the helicity-two, -one and -zero modes are diagonalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 173 (1939) 211 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Resummation of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv:1011.1232] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Hassan and R.A. Rosen, Resolving the ghost problem in non-linear massive gravity, arXiv:1106.3344 [INSPIRE].

  5. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A. Tolley, Ghost free massive gravity in the Stückelberg language, arXiv:1107.3820 [INSPIRE].

  6. S. Folkerts, A. Pritzel and N. Wintergerst, On ghosts in theories of self-interacting massive spin-2 particles, arXiv:1107.3157 [INSPIRE].

  7. K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical aspects of massive gravity, arXiv:1105.3735 [INSPIRE].

  8. H. van Dam and M. Veltman, Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields, Nucl. Phys. B 22 (1970) 397 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass, JETP Lett. 12 (1970) 312 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 12 (1970) 447] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Phys. Lett. B 39 (1972) 393 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Boulware and S. Deser, Can gravitation have a finite range?, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 3368 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi and M.D. Schwartz, Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space, Annals Phys. 305 (2003) 96 [hep-th/0210184] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Dubovsky, Phases of massive gravity, JHEP 10 (2004) 076 [hep-th/0409124] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, M. Papucci and E. Trincherini, Ghosts in massive gravity, JHEP 09 (2005) 003 [hep-th/0505147] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Alberte, A.H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Massive gravity: exorcising the ghost, JHEP 04 (2011) 004 [arXiv:1011.0183] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A.H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Massive gravity simplified: a quadratic action, JHEP 08 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1106.5868] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Koyama, G. Niz and G. Tasinato, Strong interactions and exact solutions in non-linear massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 064033 [arXiv:1104.2143] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, L. Heisenberg and D. Pirtskhalava, Cosmic acceleration and the helicity-0 graviton, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 103516 [arXiv:1010.1780] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Chkareuli and D. Pirtskhalava, Vainshtein mechanism in Λ3-theories, arXiv:1105.1783 [INSPIRE].

  20. G. D’Amico, C. de Rham, S. Dubovsky, G. Gabadadze, D. Pirtskhalava and A.J. Tolley, Massive cosmologies, arXiv:1108.5231 [INSPIRE].

  21. T. Nieuwenhuizen, Exact Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes in a family of massive gravity models, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 024038 [arXiv:1103.5912] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Hassan and R.A. Rosen, On non-linear actions for massive gravity, JHEP 07 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1103.6055] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia de Rham.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1108.4521

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Rham, C., Gabadadze, G. & Tolley, A.J. Helicity decomposition of ghost-free massive gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 93 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2011)093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2011)093

Keywords

Navigation