Skip to main content
Log in

E 8 duality and dual gravity

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We construct the non-linear realisation of the E 8 motion group and compare this with the bosonic sector of eleven dimensional supergravity. The construction naturally leads to the introduction of a new potential field. We identify this new field with the dual gravity field by considering the reduction of the eleven-dimensional theory to three dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Cremmer, B. Julia and J. Scherk, Supergravity theory in eleven-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 409 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The N = 8 supergravity theory. 1. The Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B 80 (1978) 48 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The SO(8) supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 141 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Julia, Group disintegrations, in Superspace and supergravity: proceedings of the Nuffield workshop, Cambridge 1980, S.W. Hawking and M. Rocek eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1981) 331.

  5. H. Nicolai, The integrability of n = 16 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 402 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lü and C. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 1., Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 73 [hep-th/9710119] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Hull and P. Townsend, Unity of superstring dualities, Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995) 109 [hep-th/9410167] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 85 [hep-th/9503124] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, d = 11 supergravity with local SU(8) invariance, Nucl. Phys. B 274 (1986) 363 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Nicolai, d = 11 supergravity with local SO(16) invariance, Phys. Lett. B 187 (1987) 316 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Hitchin, Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 54 (2003) 281 [math/0209099] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Hitchin, Brackets, forms and invariant functionals, math/0508618 [INSPIRE].

  13. M. Gualtieri, Generalized complex geometry, math/0401221 [INSPIRE].

  14. P.C. West, E 11 , SL(32) and central charges, Phys. Lett. B 575 (2003) 333 [hep-th/0307098] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Hull, Generalised geometry for M-theory, JHEP 07 (2007) 079 [hep-th/0701203] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. P.P. Pacheco and D. Waldram, M-theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials, JHEP 09 (2008) 123 [arXiv:0804.1362] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Koepsell, H. Nicolai and H. Samtleben, An exceptional geometry for D = 11 supergravity?, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 3689 [hep-th/0006034] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Hillmann, Generalized E 7(7) coset dynamics and D = 11 supergravity, JHEP 03 (2009) 135 [arXiv:0901.1581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D.S. Berman and M.J. Perry, Generalized geometry and M-theory, JHEP 06 (2011) 074 [arXiv:1008.1763] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, SO(5, 5) duality in M-theory and generalized geometry, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 65 [arXiv:1103.5733] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M.J. Perry and P. West, Duality invariant actions and generalised geometry, JHEP 02 (2012) 108 [arXiv:1111.0459] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Duff and J. Lu, Duality rotations in membrane theory, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 394 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory, JHEP 09 (2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, The gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets, JHEP 09 (2009) 090 [arXiv:0908.1792] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Background independent action for double field theory, JHEP 07 (2010) 016 [arXiv:1003.5027] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Generalized metric formulation of double field theory, JHEP 08 (2010) 008 [arXiv:1006.4823] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5453 [hep-th/9302036] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Siegel, Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2826 [hep-th/9305073] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Differential geometry with a projection: application to double field theory, JHEP 04 (2011) 014 [arXiv:1011.1324] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Frame-like geometry of double field theory, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 085404 [arXiv:1011.4101] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Stringy differential geometry, beyond Riemann, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044022 [arXiv:1105.6294] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry I: type II theories, JHEP 11 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1107.1733] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. O. Hohm and S.K. Kwak, Double field theory formulation of heterotic strings, JHEP 06 (2011) 096 [arXiv:1103.2136] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Double field formulation of Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 260 [arXiv:1102.0419] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. O. Hohm, S.K. Kwak and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory of type II strings, JHEP 09 (2011) 013 [arXiv:1107.0008] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Jeon, K. Lee and J.-H. Park, Incorporation of fermions into double field theory, JHEP 11 (2011) 025 [arXiv:1109.2035] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. D.S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M. Godazgar and M.J. Perry, The local symmetries of M-theory and their formulation in generalised geometry, JHEP 01 (2012) 012 [arXiv:1110.3930] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, E d(d) × \( {{\mathbb{R}}^{+}} \) generalised geometry, connections and M-theory, arXiv:1112.3989 [INSPIRE].

  39. D.S. Berman, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt and D.C. Thompson, The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms, JHEP 01 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1208.5884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry II: E d(d) × \( {{\mathbb{R}}^{+}} \) and M-theory, arXiv:1212.1586 [INSPIRE].

  41. J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, U-geometry : SL(5), JHEP 04 (2013) 147 [arXiv:1302.1652] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Cederwall, J. Edlund and A. Karlsson, Exceptional geometry and tensor fields, arXiv:1302.6736 [INSPIRE].

  43. G. Aldazabal, M. Graña, D. Marqués and J. Rosabal, Extended geometry and gauged maximal supergravity, arXiv:1302.5419 [INSPIRE].

  44. C. Isham, A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Nonlinear realizations of space-time symmetries. Scalar and tensor gravity, Annals Phys. 62 (1971) 98 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. A. Borisov and V. Ogievetsky, Theory of dynamical affine and conformal symmetries as gravity theory, Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (1975) 1179 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. P.C. West, Hidden superconformal symmetry in M-theory, JHEP 08 (2000) 007 [hep-th/0005270] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. F. Riccioni and P. West, Local E 11, JHEP 04 (2009) 051 [arXiv:0902.4678] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. N. Marcus and J.H. Schwarz, Three-dimensional supergravity theories, Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983) 145 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. B. Julia, Application of supergravity to gravitation theory, in Unified field theories in more than 4 dimensions, V.D. Sabbata and E. Schmutzer eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1983) 215.

  50. C. Hull, Strongly coupled gravity and duality, Nucl. Phys. B 583 (2000) 237 [hep-th/0004195] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. C. Hull, Symmetries and compactifications of (4,0) conformal gravity, JHEP 12 (2000) 007 [hep-th/0011215] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. P.C. West, E 11 and M-theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 4443 [hep-th/0104081] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. C. Hull, Duality in gravity and higher spin gauge fields, JHEP 09 (2001) 027 [hep-th/0107149] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Duality in linearized gravity, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 024018 [gr-qc/0408101] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. T. Curtright, Generalized gauge fields, Phys. Lett. B 165 (1985) 304 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger and M. Henneaux, Consistent deformations of dual formulations of linearized gravity: a no go result, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 044010 [hep-th/0210278] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. N. Obers, B. Pioline and E. Rabinovici, M theory and U duality on T d with gauge backgrounds, Nucl. Phys. B 525 (1998) 163 [hep-th/9712084] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. N. Obers and B. Pioline, U duality and M-theory, Phys. Rept. 318 (1999) 113 [hep-th/9809039] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. E.A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, S.F. Kerstan, A. Kleinschmidt and F. Riccioni, Dual gravity and matter, Gen. Rel. Grav. 41 (2009) 39 [arXiv:0803.1963] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. N. Boulanger and O. Hohm, Non-linear parent action and dual gravity, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 064027 [arXiv:0806.2775] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. E.A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo and O. Hohm, Can dual gravity be reconciled with E 11 ?, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 371 [arXiv:0903.4384] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. P. West, Generalised geometry, eleven dimensions and E 11, JHEP 02 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1111.1642] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. N. Boulanger, P.P. Cook and D. Ponomarev, Off-shell Hodge dualities in linearised gravity and E 11, JHEP 09 (2012) 089 [arXiv:1205.2277] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lü and C. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 2. Twisted selfduality of doubled fields and superdualities, Nucl. Phys. B 535 (1998) 242 [hep-th/9806106] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. E. Cartan, Les groupes réels simples, finis et continus, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 31 (1914) 263.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. K. Peeters, A field-theory motivated approach to symbolic computer algebra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 550 [cs/0608005] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Godazgar.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1303.2035

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godazgar, H., Godazgar, M. & Perry, M.J. E 8 duality and dual gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)044

Keywords

Navigation