Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pursuing the Pavlovian Contributions to Induction in Rats Responding for 1% Sucrose Reinforcement

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated whether Pavlovian conditioning contributes, in the form of the response operandum serving as a conditioned stimulus, to the increase in the rate of response for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming. Rats were exposed to conditions in which sign tracking for 1% sucrose was measured when a subsequent period would or would not provide food pellets. Upcoming food pellets produced an increase in the sign-tracking response, but several accounts could potentially explain that increase. In a second experiment, rats responded at a higher rate for 1% sucrose on a lever predictive of upcoming food pellets than on a lever reliably followed by nonreinforcement. A similar result occurred in concurrent-choice probe sessions. These results, consistent with those of the first experiment, cannot be accounted for by the same alternative explanations and therefore suggest that Pavlovian conditioning can contribute to the observance of positive induction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • HEARST, E., & JENKINS, H. M. (1974). Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESCORLA, R.A. (2006). Stimulus generalization of excitation and inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, G.S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 57–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • USLANER, J. M., ACERBO, M. J., JONES, S. A., & ROBINSON, T. E. (2006). The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behavioural Brain Research, 169, 320–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., ARTHUR, E. I. L., PALBICKI, J., & NURNBERGER, J. T. (2004). Induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement: Effects on subsequent operant responding. Learning and Motivation, 35, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., HIMLE, M. B., PLUMM, K. M., & MOULTON, P. L. (2001). Three tests of “anticipatory responding” as an account for induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement. Behavioural Processes, 56, 49–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., KING, B. M., & URAN, E. L. (2003). Upcoming food-pellet reinforcement alters rats’ lever pressing for liquid sucrose delivered by a progressive-ratio schedule. Behavioural Processes, 63, 73–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., LANG. K. K., & KING, B. M. (2004). Does the temporal placement of food-pellet reinforcement alter induction when rats respond on a three-component multiple schedule? Psychological Record, 54, 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., LANG, K. K., KING, B. M., BESTE, R., & GROVE, C. (2006). Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 654–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., NURNBERGER, J. T., & KRISTIANSEN-MOEN, L. A. (2006). The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% Sucrose. Behavioural Processes, 73, 156–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., PLUMM, K. M., SMITH, J. R., & ROBERTS, W. A. (2002). On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., STOUT, J. E., MCMURRY, A. S., RUE, H. C., & MELVILLE, C. L. (1999). Within-session responding when different reinforcers are delivered in each half of the session. Behavioural Processes, 46, 227–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WEATHERLY, J. N., TISCHART, L. M., & PALBICKI, J. (2003). Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement. Behavioural Processes, 64, 113–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, B. A. (2002). Behavioral contrast redux. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202-8380, USA

    Jeffrey N. Weatherly, Amber Huls & Ashley Kulland

Authors
  1. Jeffrey N. Weatherly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amber Huls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashley Kulland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey N. Weatherly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weatherly, J.N., Huls, A. & Kulland, A. Pursuing the Pavlovian Contributions to Induction in Rats Responding for 1% Sucrose Reinforcement. Psychol Rec 57, 577–592 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395596

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395596

Search

Navigation