Abstract
Ethical issues relating to painful experimentation on animals have received little attention in the literature. It is contended that this is because of the widespread acceptance of nonscientific distinctions between human beings and animals, and a consequent failure to consider the proposition that sentient creatures have interests deserving of consideration. The role of institutional factors, particularly language, in creating and maintaining the traditional notion of animals is discussed. An alternative ethical approach which would not permit painful experimentation on animals is proposed and its implications briefly examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, Committee on Precautions and Standards in Animal Experimentation. 1971. Principles for the care and use of animals. Washington D.C.: A.P.A.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. 1973. Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human subjects. Washington, D.C.: A.P.A.
BACHRACH, A. J. 1962. Psychological research: An introduction. New York: Random House.
BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS BOARD. 1979. Report of the working party on animal experimentation. Bulletin of the B.P.S., 32, 44–52.
COOK, S. W. 1975. A comment on the ethical issues involved in West, Gunn and Chernicky’s “Ubiquitous Watergate: An attributional analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 66–68.
DIENER, E., & CRANDALL, R. 1978. Ethics in social and behavioral research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
EISNER, M. 1977. Ethical problems in social psychological experimentation in the laboratory. Canadian Psychological Review, 18, 233–241.
FRASER, A. 1975. Ethology and ethics. Applied Animal Ethology, 1, 211–212.
HARLOW, H., & HARLOW, M. 1962. Social deprivation in monkeys. Scientific American, 207,5, 136–146.
HEBB, D. 1964. A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
HEIM, A. 1970. Intelligence and personality. Harmondsworth, England: Pelican.
HEIM, A. 1979. Report of the working party an animal experimentation. Bulletin of the B.P.S., 32, 113–114.
HESS, E. H. 1972. “Imprinting” in a natural laboratory. Scientific American, 227, 2, 24–31.
HUMPHREY, N. K. 1972. Seeing and nothingness. New Scientist, 53, 789, 682–684.
KINDLER, J. M., & GERGEN, K. J. 1965. An assessment of the current impact of philosophy on psychology. American Psychologist, 20, 559 (abstract).
LEFRANCOIS, G. 1975. Psychology for teaching (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
PRATT, D. 1976. Painful experiments on animals. New York: Argus Archives.
REISS, D. 1977. Freedom of inquiry and subjects’ rights: An introduction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 891–892.
RYDER, R. 1971. Experiments on animals. In S. Godlovitch, R. Godlovitch, & J. Harris (Eds.), Animals, men and morals, London: Gollancz.
RYDER, R. 1975. Victims of science: The use of animals in research. London: Davis-Poynter.
SCHLENKER, B., & FORSYTH, D. 1977. On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 369–396.
SIDMAN, M. 1960. Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.
SINGER, P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: New York Review Books.
SMYTH, D. H. 1978. Alternatives to animal experiments. London: Scolar Press.
SPERLINGER, D. 1979. Working party on animal experimentation. Bulletin of the B.P.S., 32, 291–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowd, A.D. Ethical Reservations About Psychological Research with Animals. Psychol Rec 30, 201–210 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394670
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394670