Skip to main content
Log in

Successive Negative Contrast Effects for Activity-Conditioned Goldfish (Carassiusauratus) as a Function of Housing Conditions

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young goldfish were individually housed in large containers (Part 1), individually housed in small containers (Part 2), or housed in large containers in groups of five (Part 3). The fish were run in sets of five fish (five fish simultaneously in an activity-conditioning chamber). Thus, the fish had to compete for the large or small US that was dropped in the water following a 10-sec. CS (light). Fish in each part comprised groups LS (large US in the first phase of training and small US in the second phase of training), LL, SL and SS. All LS groups showed downward shifts in activity and negative contras effects (lower activity levels than SS control fish). None of the SL groups produced complete upward shifts in activity. Group-housed fish in Part 3 showed larger increases in activity to the CS than individually housed fish in Parts 1 and 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BITTERMAN, M.E. 1966. Animal learning. In J.B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • BREUNING, S.E., & WOLACH, A.H. 1977. Successive negative contrast effects with goldfish (Carassius auratus). The Psychological Record, 27, 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COCHRANE, T.L., SCOBIE, S.R., & FALLON, D. 1973. Negative contrast in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GONZALEZ, R.C., POTTS, A., PITCOFF, K., & BITTERMAN, M.E. 1972. Runway performance of goldfish as a function of complete and incomplete reduction in amount of reward. Psychonomic Science, 27, 305–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LOWES, G., & BITTERMAN, M.E. 1967. Reward and learning in the goldfish. Science, 157 456–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1971. Reward and aftereffects of reward in the learning of goldfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 225–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RAYMOND, B., ADERMAN, M., & WOLACH, A. H. 1972. Incentive shifts in the goldfish. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 78, 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOLACH, A.H., RAYMOND, B., & HURST, J. W. 1973. Reward magnitude shifts with goldfish. The Psychological Record, 23, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, J. L. 1970. Effects of the duration of a secondary reinforcer on subsequent instrumental responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 348–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOLF, J. B. 1936. Effectiveness of token rewards for chimpanzees. Comparative Psychological Monographs, 12 (Serial No. 60).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breuning, S.E., Wolach, A.H. Successive Negative Contrast Effects for Activity-Conditioned Goldfish (Carassiusauratus) as a Function of Housing Conditions. Psychol Rec 29, 245–254 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394610

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394610

Navigation