Skip to main content
Log in

Willingness to pay for reduction in air pollution: a multilevel analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the multilevel model approach to analyzing contingent valuation surveys of individuals’ willingness to pay for reductions in the level of air pollution. It is likely that individuals living in the same area are exposed to the same level of air pollution, and accordingly these individuals’ valuations of a reduction may be correlated. Thus, the data have a hierarchical structure with individuals clustered within regions, and this structure violates the general assumption of independence among observations. Multilevel models allow for this type of data structure. In this paper we analyze individuals’ stated willingness to pay in an open-ended contingent valuation survey for a reduction in the local level of air pollution in Sweden. The results suggest that most variations are among individuals. However, our results indicate that there are also variations at higher levels, which may be explained by homogeneous preferences for a reduction in air pollution among individuals living in the same household or region with a similar level of air pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini A, Cropper M, Fu T, Krupnick A, Liu J, Shaw D, Harrington W (1997a) Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberini A, Kanninen B, Carson T (1997b) Modelling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics 73:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (1999) Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Applied Economics 32:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P, Hausman J (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspective 8:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G (1996) Health-related behaviour in context: a multilevel modelling approach. Social Science and Medicine 42:817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood L, Olovsson P (1999) Household market and nonmarket activities (HUS): survey description 1996 panel survey. Department of Economics, Gothenburg University

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H (1987) Multilevel models in educational and social research. Charles Griffen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H (1995) Multilevel statistical models. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H, Rasbash J, Plewis I, Draper D, Brown W, Yang M, Woodhouse G, Healy M (1998) A user’s guide to MLwiN. University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen B (1996) Ordering effects in contingent valuation surveys: willingness to pay for reduced health damage from air pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics 8:485–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen B, Saelensminde K (1998) Differences between willingness-to-pay estimates from open-ended and discrete-choice contingent valuation methods: the effects of heteroskedasticity. Land Economics 74:262–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson C, Hadenius A, Johansson P-Å, Jonsson T (1999) SHAPE The Stockholm study on health effects of air pollution and their economic consequences. Part I. NO2 and particulate matter in Stockholm: concentrations and population exposure. AQMA Report 6:98. Swedish National Road Administration, Stockholm, 1999, 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K (1991) Multi-level models for geographical research. Geobooks, Norwich, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriström B (1993) Comparing continuous and discrete contingent valuation questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 3:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford I, Bateman I (1999) Multi-level modelling and contingent valuation. In: Bateman I, Willis K (eds) Valuing environmental preferences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 442–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford I, Bateman I, Jones A, Langford H, Georgiou S (1998a) Improved estimation of willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Economics 74:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford I, Kontogianni A, Skourtos M, Georgiou S, Bateman I (1998b) Multivariate mixed models for open-ended contingent valuation data. Environmental and Resource Economics 12:443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Carson R (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice N, Jones A (1997) Multilevel models and health economics. Health Economics 6:561–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, Shiell A (1997) Analysing the effect of competition on general practitioners’ behaviour using a multilevel modelling framework. Health Economics 6:577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P. Willingness to pay for reduction in air pollution: a multilevel analysis. Environ Econ Policy Stud 4, 17–27 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353969

Key words

Navigation