Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the type, frequency and usage rate of assistive devices in daily life activities in a community-based population aged 70 and over (N=170), as well as the particular part of the intervention trial which focused on un-met needs, and the usage rate and effectiveness of assistive devices 6 and 12 months after prescription. Among persons under 80 years of age, 24% were users of assistive devices; in the 80 years or above group, this figure rose to 57%. Hygiene and mobility devices were the most common. The usage rate of assistive devices was 84%. The reasons for disuse were an improved health status, or difficulties in using the device. Sixteen percent of the study population had un-met needs of assistive devices. At follow-up visits, the subjects estimated a high degree of effectiveness when using the devices, particularly in the form of reduced difficulty and increment of safety, and increased capacity and ability in various activities. We conclude that the use of assistive devices increases with age, and that most of the assistive devices are used and are effective. As the need for assistive devices changes over time, follow-ups in the home are necessary. Therefore, to meet the needs of a growing elderly population, information about assistive technology should be supplied to both personnel in health care and in the social service system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hjälpmedelsverksamhetens utveckling-kartläggning och bedömning. (Development, survey, and assessment of assistive devices services. Assistive Devices Inquiry). Swedish Government Official Reports Series SOU 1989:39, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlain A.M., Thornley G., Stowe J., Wright V.: Evaluation of aids and equipment for the bath: II. A possible solution to the problem. Rheumatol. Rehabil. 20: 38–43, 1981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finlayson M., Havixbeck K.: A post-discharge study on the use of assistive devices. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 59: 201–217, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Geiger C.M.: The utilization of assistive devices by patients discharged from an acute rehabilitation setting. Phys. Occup. Ther. Geriatrics 9: 3–25, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gitlin L.N., Levine R., Geiger C.: Adaptive device use by older adults with mixed disabilities. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74: 149–152, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bynum H.S., Rogers J.C.: The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. Occup. Ther. J. Res. 7: 181–191, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haworth R.J., Hopkins J.: Use of aids following total hip replacement. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 43: 398–400, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haworth R.J.: Use of aids during the first three months after total hip replacement. Br. J. Rheumatol. 22: 29–35, 1983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mann W.C., Karuza J., Hurren D., Tomita M.: Assistive devices for home-based elderly persons with cognitive impairments. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 8: 35–52, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers J.C., Holm M.B.: Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 46: 120–127, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seeger M.S., Fisher L.A.: Adaptive equipment used in the rehabilitation of hip arthroplasty patients. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 36: 503–508, 1982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mann W.C., Hurren D., Tomita M.: Comparison of assistive devices use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 47: 980–987, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker M.G., Thorslund M.: The use of technical aids among community-based elderly. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 45: 712–718, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone R.G., Staisey N., Sonn U.: Systems for delivery of assistive equipment to elders in Canada, Sweden and the United States. Int. J. Technol. Aging 4: 129–140, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sonn U., Grimby G.: Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil. Rehabil. 16: 85–92, 1994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Augustsson O., Eriksson B.G., Rosenhall U., Rothenberg E., Wärne B., Steen B.: The Johanneberg study — a sociomedical survey in an urban elderly population. I. General presentation of the study including an analysis of non-response and identification of risk groups. Scand. J. Soc. Med. 22: 283–292, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sonn U.: Longitudinal Studies of Dependence in Daily Life Activities. Methodological development, use of assistive devices and relation to impairments and functional limitations. Doctoral thesis. Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Geriatric Medicine, Göteborg University, Gothenburg 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spector W.D., Katz S., Murphy J.B.: The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. J. Chron. Dis. 6: 481–489, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guralnik J.M., Simonsick E.M.: Physical disability in older Americans. J. Gerontol. 48: 3–10, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campell A.J., Busby W.J., Robertson M.C., Lum C.L., Langlois J.A., Morgan F.C.: Disease, impairment, disability and social handicap: a community-based study of people aged 70 years or over. Disabil. Rehabil. 16: 72–79, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonn U., Grimby G., Svanborg A.: Activities of daily living studied longitudinally between 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil. Rehabil. 18: 91–100, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiener J.M., Hanely R.J., Clark R., Van Nostrand J.F.: Measuring the activities of daily living: comparisons across national surveys. J. Gerontol. 45: S229–S237, 1990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sonn U., Hulter åsberg K.: Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand. J. Rehab. Med. 23: 193–202, 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gosman-Hedström G., Aniansson A., Persson G-B.: ADL-reduction and need for technical aids among 70-year-olds. From the population study of 70-year-olds in Göteborg. Comprehensive Gerontology 2: 16–23, 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lundgren-Lindquist B., Grimby G., Landahl S.: Functional studies in 79-year-olds. I. Performance in hygiene activities. Scand. J. Rehab. Med. 15: 109–115, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lundgren-Lindquist B., Aniansson A., Rundgren Å.: Func-

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Göteborg University, Vasa Hospital, S-411 33, Gothenburg, Sweden

    U. Sonn, H. Davegårdh, A-C. Lindskog & B. Steen

Authors
  1. U. Sonn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Davegårdh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A-C. Lindskog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Steen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonn, U., Davegårdh, H., Lindskog, AC. et al. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population. Aging Clin Exp Res 8, 176–183 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339674

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339674

Search

Navigation