Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Protein Pattern of Two Cotyledon Explants of Vigna radiata During Induced In Vitro Differentiation: Probable Implication in the Conundrum of Differential Regeneration Response

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differential regeneration response in two cotyledon types (Cot and Cot E) of Vigna radiata was reported earlier. The Cot (one cotyledon) is easily detachable from the germinating embryonal axis, whereas, Cot E (the other cotyledon) remains firmly attached during seed germination or after imbibition. Shoots differentiated directly from the Cot E under the induction of in vitro differentiation, while, under the same milieu, shoot differentiation was preceded by callus differentiation from Cot. In this study, we present comparative analyses of protein profiles from these two explant types recorded at different point of time during induction of differentiation. Cot E always contained higher amounts of soluble protein than the Cot. Likewise, higher de novo protein synthesis was noted in Cot E than in Cot as revealed by 35S methionine labeled study. Two polypeptides of ∼37 and 84 kD disappeared earlier from Cot E than Cot and is presumed to be linked with shoot induction. Two marker proteins of ∼88 and 158 kD synthesized during shoot differentiation were apparent. It was observed that the labeled protein synthesis initiated within 3h in Cot E under in vitro condition, while, no labeled protein was detected from Cot even at 12h. Irrespective of the mode of differentiation, a large amount of protein was hydrolyzed during the process of differentiation. However, in case of Cot, the process was delayed by a day than Cot E. In all probability, this is an indication of delayed cytokinin induced rejuvenation of Cot. Temporal difference in protein profile was also evident in these two explant types during in vitro differentiation. Yet, three major groups of proteins were consistently present in both the explants. The biochemical differences recorded between these two explants during induction of in vitro differentiation reflects the temporal difference in gene expression. Perhaps Cot E has the distinctiveness due to the temporal differences in certain key gene expression and proved its greater suitability over Cot for shoot regeneration purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

N6-benzylaminopurine

Met:

methionine

Cot:

cotyledon attached to the embryonal axis

Cot E:

cotyledon firmly attached to the embryonal axis

Reference

  1. Chandra M & Pal A, Plant Cell Rep, 15 (1995) 248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Das S & Pal A, J Plant Biochem Biotech, 13 (2004) 101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed F & Slinkard AE, Theor Appl Genet, 84 (1992) 688.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gardiner SE & Forde MB, In Modern methods of plant analysis: Seed analysis Vol 14 (HF Linskens, JF Jackson, Editors) Springer-Verlag, New York (1992) pp 43–61.

  5. Gepts P, Llaca V, Nodari RO & Panela L, In Modern methods of plant analysis: Seed analysis, Vol. 14 (HF Linskens, JF Jackson, Editors) Springer-Verlag, New York (1992) pp 63–93.

  6. Takehisa I, Noda C, Mori S, Yamashita M, Nakanishi H, Inoue M & Kamijima O, Breeding Sci, 51 (2001) 225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomooka N, Lairungreang C, Nakeeraks P, Egawa Y & Thavarasook C, Theor Appl Genet 83 (1992) 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K, Exp Cell Res, 50 (1968) 151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Das S & Pal A, J Plant Biochem Biotech, 12 (2003) 11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL & Randall RJ, J Biol Chem, 193 (1951) 265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laemmli UK, Nature, 227 (1970) 680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Luthe DS, Plant Physiol, 84 (1987) 337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF & Maniatis T, Molecular cloning: A Laboratory manual (2nd edition), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York (1989) p E. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Renaudin JP, Tournaire & de La Serva BT, Physiol Plant, 82 (1991) 48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maksyutova NN, Galeeva EI, Rumyantseva NI & Viktorova LV, Biology Bulletin, 32 (2005) 250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu CM, Johnson S, Hedley CL & Wang TL, In Embryogenesis: The generation of a plant (TL Wang, AC Cuming, Editors) Oxford: Bios Sci. Publi, UK (1996) pp 191–213.

  17. Beaudoin-Eagan LD & Thorpe TA, Plant Physiol, 78 (1985) 438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thorpe TA, Int Rev Cytol, 11A (1980) 71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dodeman VL & Ducreux G, Plant Sci, 120 (1996) 57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shan HY, Li XW, Li D, Shao XQ & Liu B, Russ J Plant Physiol, 51 (2004) 379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Das S, Ph. D. thesis, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India (2001) pp 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cordewener R, Busink RJA, Traas JBM, Custers HJMD & Van Lookern Campagne MM, Planta (Berlin), 195 (1994) 50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Racusen RH & Schiavone FM, Development, 103 (1988) 665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S., Sengupta, D.N. & Pal, A. Differential Protein Pattern of Two Cotyledon Explants of Vigna radiata During Induced In Vitro Differentiation: Probable Implication in the Conundrum of Differential Regeneration Response. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 15, 123–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321915

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321915

Key words

Navigation