Abstract
Following the political changes of 1994 in South Africa, the decision was taken to replace the traditional skills-based education system at primary and secondary school level (Grades 1–12) with an outcomes-based education system (OBE). The implementation of the OBE system did not come without problems, giving rise to revised initiatives. The OBE approach, referred to as Curriculum 2005, was introduced into schools in 1998, for all learners in Grades 1–6 and progressively phased in after that. In 2002, the OBE system was put on hold for the two upper grades of these learners. Learners in these two grades reverted back to skills-based learning for their last three years of schooling, i.e. in Grades 10 – 12. The most senior of these learners that had been subjected to four years of OBE and another three years of the old system finished their schooling in 2005 and 2006 and entered university in 2006 and 2007. These groups are of interest. Students ahead of them had their full schooling in the old system and students two years younger were only subjected to OBE. These students are the “group in the middle”. This paper reports on what the impact is of the growing pains of such a new, inadequately planned education system on the mathematics preparedness of students entering university. This report will be extended in 2009 when the learners that have been fully subjected to the OBE system enter university.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AARP (Current).Alternative Admissions Research Project. Retrieved July 2007 from http://www.ched.uct.ac.za/adp/aarp/
Bengu, S. M. E. (1997). Foreword inCurriculum 2005: Lifelong learning for the 21 st century. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Cox, W. (2000). Predicting the mathematical preparedness of first year undergraduates for teaching and learning purposes.International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 31(2), 227–248.
Craig, T. (2007).Promoting understanding in mathematical problem-solving through writing: A Piagetian analysis. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse classrooms.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156.
Department of Education. (1997).Curriculum 2005. Pretoria: Department of Education. Retrieved on 28 November 2003 from http://www.policy.org.za/govdocs/misc/curr2005.html.
Department of Education. (2000).Instructional leadership. School management teams. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2005).Systemic evaluation intermediate phase teacher’s guide. Mathematics. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Graven, M. (2002). Coping with new mathematics teacher roles in a contradictory context of curriculum change.The Mathematics Educator, 12(2), 21–27.
Haeck, W., Yeld, N., Conradie, J., Robertson, N., & Shall, A. (1997). A developmental approach to mathematics testing for university admissions and course placement.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 71–91.
Hoyles, C., Newman, K., & Noss, R. (2001). Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 829–845.
Jacobs, M, Gawe, N & Vakalisa, N. (2000).Teaching-learning dynamics: A participative approach to OBE. Johannesburg: Heinemann.
Jansen, J. D. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education.Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–331.
Kentucky Department of Education. (1995).Transformations: Kentucky’s curriculum framework, Volume II. Frankfort: Author.
Lichakane, T. E. (2005).Teaching methods used by educators at Marquard sub-district: An OBE perspective. MEd dissertation, University of the Free State. Retrieved on 14 February 2007 from http://www.fsdoe.fs.gov.za/orginfo/research/teachingmethods.pdf.
Northedge, A. (2003). Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity.Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 17–32.
Owen, J. E. (1995).Cooperative learning in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
Revised National Curriculum Statement. (2002).Teacher’s guide for development of learning programme: Policy naturals sciences. Grade R-9 (Schools). Pretoria: Department of Education.
Seymore, E. (2001). Tracking the processes of change in U. S. undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology.Science Education, 86, 79 -105.
Wood, L. (2001). The secondary-tertiary interface. In D. Holton (Ed.)The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level, An ICMI study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Changing contexts in tertiary mathematics: Implications for diversity and equity. In D. Holton (Ed.)The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level, An ICMI study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A. The impact of the transition to outcomes-based teaching on university preparedness in mathematics in South Africa. Math Ed Res J 20, 57–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217477
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217477