Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial production of transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton varieties and the resistance management for bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

There are currently three kinds of transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton gerrnplasm lines, Shanxi 94-24, Zhongxin 94 and R19, in China. They showed high resistance to the neonate larvae of bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). Transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton varieties or hybrids have been bred using the three kinds of germplasm lines as parents. Our researches reveal that there exist different expressions in resistant level at different developmental stages in the three categories of germplasm lines. When neonate larvae are fed with leaves of cotton plant at the seeding stage with less than 10 leaves on the main stem, the mortality of the neonate larvae is 100%, but the resistance level will decline at later season. When Bt gene has been transferred to the cotton genome, it can be steadily transferred to the progeny, the level of resistance to bollworm keeps fundamentally uniform. Such insects as tobacco budworm (Heliothis virencens) in laboratory directive selection are very apt to produce resistance to the Bt insecticidal crystal protein. From the present crop system of cotton region in the Yangtze and Yellow River Valleys, and the expression characteristic of transgenic Bt resistant cotton, we suggest that the resistance to toxin protein in bollworm is not apt to be produced if the transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton varieties are released and grown in the regions except in the Xinjiang cotton region. The managing strategies to delay or retard the resistance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton, K. A., Miller, M. J., Production of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins in plants, in Transgenic Plants (eds. Kung, S., Wu, R.), Vol. 1, Wisconsin: Academic Press, Inc. 1993, 297.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray, E. E., DeBoer, D. L., Transgenic cotton, in Transgenic Plants (eds. Kung, S., Wu, R.), Vol. 2, Wisconsin: Academic Press Inc., 1993. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaeck, M., Reynaerts, A., Hofte, H. et al., Transgenic plants protected from insect attack, Nature, 1987, 328(2): 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, Z. L., Zhu, Z., The advances of plant genetic engineering of anti-insect pest, Adv. Biothech., 1994, 14(4): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benedict, J. H., Altma, D. W., Umbeck, P. F. et al., Behavior, growth, survival, and plant injury by Heliothis virescens(F.) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidne) on transgenic Bt cottons, J. Econ. Entomol., 1992, 85(2): 589.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xie, D. X., Fin, Y. L., Ni, W. C. et al., Transgenic cotton plants containing Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin protein gene, Science in China, Ser. B, 1991, 8(4): 367.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perlak, F. J., Deaton, R. W., Armstrong, T. A. et al., Insect resistant cotton plants, Bio/Tlech., 1990, 8: 939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, F. D., Flint, H. M., Deaton, W. R. et al., Cotton lines containing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin to pink bollworm (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae) and other insects, J. Econ. Entomol., 1992. 85: 1516.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, F. D., Flint, H. M., Deaton, W. R. et al., Yield components and fiber properties of insect resistant cotton lines containing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin gene, Crop Sci., 1994. 34: 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, J. L., Bt cotton infestations renew resistance concerns. Nature Biotech., 1997, 14: 1070.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, J. L., EPA seeks refuge from Bt resistance, Nature Biotech., 1997, 15: 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forrester. N., Pyke, B., The Bt report, The Australia Cotton Growers, 1997(1): 23.

  13. Wang, S. M., New transgenic cotton varieties released by DPL company in 1998, China Cottons (in Chinese), 1998, 25(8): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sutton, A., Plant Bt cotton strategically, Cotton Grower, 1998(4): 14.

  15. Guo, S. D., Synthesis of CrylA insecticidal Gene, Scientia Agricultura Sinica (in Chinese), 1993, 26(2): 85.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ni, W. C., Huang, J. Q., Guo, S. D. et al., Transgenic bollworm-resistant cotton plants containing the synthetic gene coding, Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. (in Chinese), 1996, 12(1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ni, W. C., Zhang, Z. L., Guo, S. D. et al., Development of transgenic insect-resistant cotton plants, Scientia Agricultura Sinica (in Chinese). 1998, 31(2): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiuo, G. L., Guo, S. D., Li, S. J. et al., Cotton genetic transformation and plant regeneration. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-sinica (in Chinese), 1997, 12(2): 82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, W. G., Jiang, Y. X., Yang, X. M. et al., Study on evaluation and utilization of Bt transgenetic cotton resistant to cotton bollworm, Scientia Agricultura Sinica (in Chinese), 1997, 30(1): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xia, J. Y., Wang, L. H., Weng, Z. G. et al., The role of transgenic Bt cotton in integrated insect management, China Cotton, 1995, 22(8): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, C. M., Zhang, T. Z., Zhu, X. F. et al., lnheritance study of resistance of transgenic Bt cotton strains to bollworm in Upland cotton, Proc. Nat. Cong Crop Breeding, Beijing: China Agri. Scientech. Press, 1998, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, C. M., Zhu, X. F., Zhang, T. Z. et al., lnheritance and resistance of transgenic Bt conon line R19 to Helicoverpa armigera, J. Agric. Biotech., 1997, 5(2): 194.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, C. M., Zhang, T. Z., Sun, J. et al., Inheritance of resistance to Heicoverpa armigera of three kinds of transgenic Bt strains available in upland cotton in China, Chinese Science Bulletin. 2000, 45(4): 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flavell, R. B., Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplixation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994. 913490.

  25. Matzke, M. A., Matzke, J., Scheid, O. M., Inactivation of repeated genes DNA-DNA interaction? in Homologous Recombination and gene Silencing in Plants (ed. Paszkowski, J.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, C. M., Zhang, T. Z., Zhu, X. F. et al., Characterization of resistance to Helicoverpa annigera in three strains of transgenic Bt of Upland cotton, J. Agric. Sci., 1999, 44(19): 2064.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fearing, P. L., Bmwm, D., Vlachos, D. et al., Quantitative analysis of CrylA(b) expression in Bt maize plants, tissues, and silage and stability of expression of expression over successive generations. Molecular Breeding. 1997. 3: 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao, J. Z., Zhao, K. J., Lu, M. G. et al., Interactions between Helicoverpa annigera and transgenic Bt cotton in North China, Scientia Agricultura Sinica (in Chinese), 1998, 31(5): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cui, J. J., Xia, J. Y., Studies on the resistance dynamic of the Bt transgenic cotton on cotton bollworm, Acta Gossypil Sinica (in Chinese), 1999, 11(3): 141.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fitt, G. P., Mares, C. L., Llewellyn, D. J., Field evaluation and potential ecological impact of transgenic cottons in Australia. Biocontrol Sci. & Tech., 1994, 4: 535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaiser, J., Pests overwhelm Bt cotton crop, Science, 1996, 14: 1070.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGaughey, W. H., Insect resistance to the biological insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis, Science, 1985, 229: 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tabashnik, B. E., Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis, Annu. Rev. Ent., 1994, 39: 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tabashnik, B. E., Cushing, N. L., Rinson, N. et al., Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: noctuidae), J. Econ. Entomol., 1990, 83(5): 1671.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gould, F., Anderson, A., Reynolds, A. et al., Selection and genetic analysis of a Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera:noctuidae) strain with high levels of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, J. Econ. Entomol., 1995, 88(6): 1545.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, Y. B., Tabashnik, B. E., Inheritance of resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Crylc in the Diamondback moth. Appl. Envir. Micro., 1997b. 63(6): 2218.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tabashnik, B. E., Malvar, T., Liu, Y. B. et al., Cross-resistance of the Diamondback moth indicates altered interactions with domain II of Bacillus thruingienesis toxins, Appl. Envir. Micro., 1996, 62(8): 2839.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tabashnik, B. E., Liu, Y. B., Finson, N. et al., One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94: 1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gould, F., Anderson, Jones, A. et al., Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94: 3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peferoen, M., Progress and prospects for field use of Bt genes in crops, TIBTECH, 1997, 1(5): 173.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, Y. B., Tabashnik, B. E., Experimental evidence that refuges delay insect adaptation to Bacillus thuringiensis, Poc. R. Soc., Lond on B. 1997a. 264: 605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McGaughey, W. H., Whalon, M. E., Managing insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, Science, 1992, 258: 1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mallet, J. M., Porter, P., Preventing insect adaptation to insect-resistant crops: are seed mixtures or refugia the best strategy? Proc. R. Soc., Lond B, 1992, 250: 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Parker, C. D., Luttrell, R. G., Inter-plant movement of tobacco budworm larvae in mixed-plantings of Bt and not-Bt cotton, Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., 1975, 775.

  45. McGaughey, W. H., Gould, F., Gelernter, W., Bt resistance management, Nature Biotech., 1998, 16: 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, F., Buschman, L. L., Higgins, R. A. et al., lnheritance of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Dipel ES) in the European corn borer, Science, 1999, 284: 965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hobbs, S. L. A., Thomas, D. W., Delong, C. M. O., Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression, Plant Mol. Bio., 1993, 21: 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kota, M., Daniell, H., Varma, S. et al., Overpression of the Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt) Cry 2Aa2 protein in Chloroplasts confers resistance to plants against susceptible and Bt-resistant insects, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, 96: 1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Guo, S. D., Cui, H. Z., Development of bivalent insect-resistant transgenic conon plants. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (in Chinese), 1999, 32(3): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, F. G., Guo, S. D., Liu, C. L. et al., The study on the transformation and selection of insect-resistant conon harboring double-gene. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 1999. 11(2): 106.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao, J. Z., Fan, X. L., Gene pyramiding: an effective strategy of resistance management for Helicoverpa armigera and Bacilluss thuringiensis, Resistant Pest Management, 1997, 9(2): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sachs, E. S., Benedict, J. H., Taylor, J. F. et al., Pyramiding CrylA(b) insecticidal protein and terpenoids in cotton to resist tobacco budworm (Lepioptera:noctuidae). Eoviron. Entomol., 1996, 25: 1257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Tang, C. Commercial production of transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton varieties and the resistance management for bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner). Chin.Sci.Bull. 45, 1249–1257 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182897

Keywords

Navigation